Re: [fossil-users] "Not all tickets are problems"

2010-02-10 Thread Jacek Cała
Apologize, I must have added this long ago, however, I wouldn't say it is unusual. Trac also uses the concept of ticket and I am pretty sure there exist others. Cheers, Jacek 2010/2/10 Ron Aaron > On Wednesday 10 February 2010 10:37:51 Jacek Cała wrote: > > For me tickets are ok and by defa

Re: [fossil-users] "Not all tickets are problems"

2010-02-10 Thread Ron Aaron
On Wednesday 10 February 2010 10:37:51 Jacek Cała wrote: > For me tickets are ok and by default you have type 'Task' configured. > If you create a report that filters by this, isn't it enough? Actually, the default is: set type_choices { Code_Defect Build_Problem Documentation Feature_

Re: [fossil-users] "Not all tickets are problems"

2010-02-10 Thread Jacek Cała
For me tickets are ok and by default you have type 'Task' configured. If you create a report that filters by this, isn't it enough? Regards, Jacek 2010/2/10 Ron Aaron > Concerning ticket [2b79f36e5a], I agree with the notion. However, I would > take it a bit further and say "issues" rath

[fossil-users] "Not all tickets are problems"

2010-02-09 Thread Ron Aaron
Concerning ticket [2b79f36e5a], I agree with the notion. However, I would take it a bit further and say "issues" rather than "tickets", throughout the product. I would also add a "Todo" type (well, I have in my own projects), as Fossil is an excellent way to keep track of meta-issues as well