Re: [fossil-users] Proposed Change To Wiki vs. HTML

2010-11-08 Thread Gour
On Sun, 25 Jul 2010 17:47:56 -0400 Richard == Richard Hipp wrote: Hello Richard, I know it's an old ( hot) thread), so I'm just looking for a simple answer... Richard A proposal: Richard Richard Five wiki modes: (1) For backwards compatibility, we must Richard support Fossil wiki (including

Re: [fossil-users] Proposed Change To Wiki vs. HTML

2010-07-27 Thread renework
On Sun, 25 Jul 2010 17:47:56 -0400, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: I really, really do not like the Use-HTML-Wiki switch and I rue the day that I ever allowed that into the code.  I have no desire to make the situation worse by making the Use-HTML-Wiki switch even more complicated.

Re: [fossil-users] Proposed Change To Wiki vs. HTML

2010-07-26 Thread renework
On Sun, 25 Jul 2010 18:29:43 -0700, Zed A. Shaw zeds...@zedshaw.com wrote: On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 04:13:47PM -0700, Zed A. Shaw wrote: Actually, none of this is necessary if you solve this one simple problem: .html will not have the header and active login state of a user, so I have to use

Re: [fossil-users] Proposed Change To Wiki vs. HTML

2010-07-26 Thread Eric
On Mon, July 26, 2010 9:33 pm, renework renew...@xs4all.nl wrote: snip/ But that defeats fossil and the wiki system because we (wrongly) want to use wiki for generating the manual. snip/ Maybe it is good to take a step back and state first what the purpose is of the wiki system in fossil.

Re: [fossil-users] Proposed Change To Wiki vs. HTML

2010-07-26 Thread Zed A. Shaw
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 09:46:14PM +0100, Eric wrote: On Mon, July 26, 2010 9:33 pm, renework renew...@xs4all.nl wrote: snip/ But that defeats fossil and the wiki system because we (wrongly) want to use wiki for generating the manual. snip/ Maybe it is good to take a step back and

[fossil-users] Proposed Change To Wiki vs. HTML

2010-07-25 Thread Zed A. Shaw
Alright so I'm going through the code for wiki_convert and thinking about the problems I've been having with using HTML for wiki, but having that setting bleed into all inputs in the system. I think I have a simple solution, but let me know what people think: 1. The setting to use HTML for the

Re: [fossil-users] Proposed Change To Wiki vs. HTML

2010-07-25 Thread Richard Hipp
I really, really do not like the Use-HTML-Wiki switch and I rue the day that I ever allowed that into the code. I have no desire to make the situation worse by making the Use-HTML-Wiki switch even more complicated. What Use-HTML-Wiki really comes down to is yet another wiki mode. Everybody (me

Re: [fossil-users] Proposed Change To Wiki vs. HTML

2010-07-25 Thread Zed A. Shaw
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 05:47:56PM -0400, Richard Hipp wrote: For embedded documentation, file that end in .html or .htm are rendered as pure HTML with no interpretation and with no header or footer added. File that end in .wiki are rendered using Fossil wiki. Files that end in .creole or

Re: [fossil-users] Proposed Change To Wiki vs. HTML

2010-07-25 Thread Zed A. Shaw
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 04:13:47PM -0700, Zed A. Shaw wrote: Actually, none of this is necessary if you solve this one simple problem: .html will not have the header and active login state of a user, so I have to use wiki, but wiki then has its own set of problems. Ok, so I've been able to