On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 9:44 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger
jo...@britannica.bec.de wrote:
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 05:18:40PM +0200, Isaac Jurado wrote:
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 4:52 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger
Delta manifests are not meant to reduce the repository size, but the
amount of parsing to be
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 12:08:42AM +0200, Isaac Jurado wrote:
After the results, the conclusion is obvious: the generic artifact delta
compression is outperforming the delta manifest convention.
So the question is, what is the rationale behind delta manifests? After
checking Fossil's
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 4:52 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger
jo...@britannica.bec.de wrote:
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 12:08:42AM +0200, Isaac Jurado wrote:
After the results, the conclusion is obvious: the generic artifact delta
compression is outperforming the delta manifest convention.
So the question
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 05:18:40PM +0200, Isaac Jurado wrote:
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 4:52 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger
Delta manifests are not meant to reduce the repository size, but the
amount of parsing to be done.
That sounds intriguing. What kind of operations can complete without
having
Hello all,
I've been working further on improving the import command. This time I
played with the generation of delta manifests with the same heuristic
used by the commit command.
But, after comparing with and without delta manifests, I noticed that
even though the total raw size of the
5 matches
Mail list logo