On 2015-03-09 21:42:51, Andy Bradford wrote:
Thus said Richard Hipp on Mon, 09 Mar 2015 23:06:59 -0400:
Which timeline graph do you prefer:
(1) https://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/timeline?y=cinomo=0
(2) https://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/timeline?y=cinomo=1
(1) because the
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 4:47 AM, Steven Harford ste...@puddletheory.com
wrote:
I prefer (2). It's more concise and looks great in each of the examples
you provided. Therefore, I'm not sure it's worth maintaining both display
styles in the source code.
Also agree
On 3/10/2015 3:47 AM, Steven Harford wrote:
I prefer (2). It's more concise and looks great in each of the examples
you provided. Therefore, I'm not sure it's worth maintaining both
display styles in the source code.
Agree.
--
Andy Goth | andrew.m.goth/at/gmail/dot/com
signature.asc
Thus said Richard Hipp on Mon, 09 Mar 2015 23:52:16 -0400:
Oh, it does. Try a graph with n=all and you'll see. When you start
to get a lot of rails, and the graph gets all scrunched together, then
(2) is clearly better. The question is should we go with (2) always,
or use (1) for graphs
Wow -- is that ever subtle... now that I see it, I think I like nomo=1
-bch
On 3/10/15, Martin S. Weber ephae...@gmx.net wrote:
On 2015-03-09 21:42:51, Andy Bradford wrote:
Thus said Richard Hipp on Mon, 09 Mar 2015 23:06:59 -0400:
Which timeline graph do you prefer:
(1)
Although both are good, my vote is for nomo=0 (choice 1) as being the one
that 'goes to 11' :)
-Original Message-
On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 11:06:59PM -0400, Richard Hipp wrote:
Which timeline graph do you prefer:
(1) https://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/timeline?y=cinomo=0
(2)
I prefer (2). It's more concise and looks great in each of the examples
you provided. Therefore, I'm not sure it's worth maintaining both
display styles in the source code.
Warm regards,
Steven
On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 11:06:59PM -0400, Richard Hipp wrote:
Which timeline graph do you prefer:
Thus said Richard Hipp on Mon, 09 Mar 2015 23:06:59 -0400:
Which timeline graph do you prefer:
(1) https://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/timeline?y=cinomo=0
(2) https://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/timeline?y=cinomo=1
(1) because the relationship to the node from which the arrow originates
is more
On 3/9/15, Andy Bradford amb-fos...@bradfords.org wrote:
Perhaps if there were
15--20 rails, where they were taking up a disproportionate amount of
space (2) might make a big enough difference.
Oh, it does. Try a graph with n=all and you'll see. When you start
to get a lot of rails,
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 11:06 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
Which timeline graph do you prefer:
(1) https://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/timeline?y=cinomo=0
(2) https://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/timeline?y=cinomo=1
I personally prefer 2. Initially 1 looks more aesthetically pleasing,
10 matches
Mail list logo
