[fossil-users] 64-bit warnings
I've been working on a fossil port for OpenBSD and noticed when compiling under OpenBSD amd64 I see a couple 'warning: cast from pointer to integer of different size' warnings attached are three patches that I was including in my port and was wondering if this is something worth changing upstream? Since there is no configure scripts provided I'm not sure how you feel about requiring stdint.h but I think it's a pretty standard library. Thanks. patch-src_main_mk Description: Binary data patch-src_makeheaders_c Description: Binary data patch-src_th_lang_c Description: Binary data ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] 64-bit warnings
On Sep 23, 2009, at 9:11 AM, James Turner wrote: I've been working on a fossil port for OpenBSD and noticed when compiling under OpenBSD amd64 I see a couple 'warning: cast from pointer to integer of different size' warnings attached are three patches that I was including in my port and was wondering if this is something worth changing upstream? Since there is no configure scripts provided I'm not sure how you feel about requiring stdint.h but I think it's a pretty standard library. Thanks. I've seen the warnings too. But I use fossil daily on 64-bit linux (SuSE 10.1) and it works fine there. So I'm not overly worried about them. Most of the warnings come from sqlite3.c. And we are very sure that it works correctly on 64-bit systems. I'll work on reducing the number of warnings. But it isn't a priority. patch-src_main_mkpatch-src_makeheaders_cpatch- src_th_lang_c___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users D. Richard Hipp d...@hwaci.com ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] 64-bit warnings
I too haven't seen any problems running fossil on 64-bit systems without my patches. One of the OpenBSD port developers asked me if I could look into fixing the warnings and suggested I check upstream. Thanks for your feedback. On Sep 23, 2009, at 11:22 AM, D. Richard Hipp wrote: On Sep 23, 2009, at 9:11 AM, James Turner wrote: I've been working on a fossil port for OpenBSD and noticed when compiling under OpenBSD amd64 I see a couple 'warning: cast from pointer to integer of different size' warnings attached are three patches that I was including in my port and was wondering if this is something worth changing upstream? Since there is no configure scripts provided I'm not sure how you feel about requiring stdint.h but I think it's a pretty standard library. Thanks. I've seen the warnings too. But I use fossil daily on 64-bit linux (SuSE 10.1) and it works fine there. So I'm not overly worried about them. Most of the warnings come from sqlite3.c. And we are very sure that it works correctly on 64-bit systems. I'll work on reducing the number of warnings. But it isn't a priority. patch-src_main_mkpatch-src_makeheaders_cpatch- src_th_lang_c___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil- users D. Richard Hipp d...@hwaci.com ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] 64-bit warnings
Has anyone had success using fossil on AIX? I was able to get the code to build, but it did not run successfully. I don't remember the exact error. At the time I needed to get my code to work, so I worked around fossil. //Bill On 09/23/2009 11:22 AM, D. Richard Hipp wrote: On Sep 23, 2009, at 9:11 AM, James Turner wrote: I've been working on a fossil port for OpenBSD and noticed when compiling under OpenBSD amd64 I see a couple 'warning: cast from pointer to integer of different size' warnings attached are three patches that I was including in my port and was wondering if this is something worth changing upstream? Since there is no configure scripts provided I'm not sure how you feel about requiring stdint.h but I think it's a pretty standard library. Thanks. I've seen the warnings too. But I use fossil daily on 64-bit linux (SuSE 10.1) and it works fine there. So I'm not overly worried about them. Most of the warnings come from sqlite3.c. And we are very sure that it works correctly on 64-bit systems. I'll work on reducing the number of warnings. But it isn't a priority. patch-src_main_mkpatch-src_makeheaders_cpatch- src_th_lang_c___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users D. Richard Hipp d...@hwaci.com ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] 64-bit warnings
On Sep 23, 2009, at 12:33 PM, Stephan Beal wrote: On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 5:47 PM, D. Richard Hipp d...@hwaci.com wrote: On Sep 23, 2009, at 11:41 AM, Bill Whiting wrote: Has anyone had success using fossil on AIX? I was able to get the code to build, but it did not run successfully. I don't remember the exact Just a guess: Try recompiling with -DSQLITE_DISABLE_DIRSYNC Another thing to try is to enable the dot-file locking mechanism (which is a workaround for platforms which doesn't support the default (POSIX?) locking mechanism). This requires setting an environment variable, but i can't for the life of me find the (recent) mail which explains what var that is (Richard?). I'd forgotten about that. Tnx for reminding me! Try one of the following: export FOSSIL_VFS=unix-dotfile export FOSSIL_VFS=unix-none The first uses dot-file locking. The second disables locking all together. D. Richard Hipp d...@hwaci.com ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] compact fossil binaries
I use Windows and after making fossil.exe, I do 'strip fossil.exe' to reduce size. - Altu - Original Message - From: Andrey Cherezov and...@cherezov.koenig.su To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org Subject: Re: [fossil-users] compact fossil binaries Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 15:40:41 +0300 23.09.2009 15:18, D. Richard Hipp wrote: On Sep 23, 2009, at 3:52 AM, Robert wrote: I was wondering, how do you get such compact fossil binaries? The best I can do is 1.1Mb compared to your 330kb for linux. The build is done using exactly the Makefile included in the source tree, with no edits or changes of any kind, on SuSE 10.1 with GCC 4.1.0. Under Mingw (Windows) I removed -g option of gcc from Makefile and this reduced fossil.exe size from 3Mb to 800kb. ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users -- An Excellent Credit Score is 750 See Yours in Just 2 Easy Steps! ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] compact fossil binaries
I just tried that myself on both Linux and Windows and saved almost a MB each. Maybe the makefile should have a strip step in it? 2009/9/24 Altu Faltu altufa...@mail.com I use Windows and after making fossil.exe, I do 'strip fossil.exe' to reduce size. - Altu - Original Message - From: Andrey Cherezov and...@cherezov.koenig.su To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org Subject: Re: [fossil-users] compact fossil binaries Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 15:40:41 +0300 23.09.2009 15:18, D. Richard Hipp wrote: On Sep 23, 2009, at 3:52 AM, Robert wrote: I was wondering, how do you get such compact fossil binaries? The best I can do is 1.1Mb compared to your 330kb for linux. The build is done using exactly the Makefile included in the source tree, with no edits or changes of any kind, on SuSE 10.1 with GCC 4.1.0. Under Mingw (Windows) I removed -g option of gcc from Makefile and this reduced fossil.exe size from 3Mb to 800kb. ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users -- An Excellent Credit Score is 750 See Yours in Just 2 Easy Steps! ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
