Re: [fossil-users] Maybe a bug in sync

2011-08-15 Thread Tomek Kott
Hi Justin, My English is not well. I don't know that you said everything worked means you get a different result of the last timeline command. My result is: Yes, I get a different result than you. What I find is for the server repository : === 2011-08-11 === 13:41:50 [925ffeb995] *CURRENT*

Re: [fossil-users] New features for merging

2011-08-15 Thread Konstantin Khomoutov
On Sun, 14 Aug 2011 19:16:50 -0700 Mike Meyer m...@mired.org wrote: [...] If you insist on them being files, then there's not much point in further discussion. And having them in files means you can bring the full power of unix to bear on them (which, of course, is why I want them *out* of my

Re: [fossil-users] New features for merging

2011-08-15 Thread Mike Meyer
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Konstantin Khomoutov flatw...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: On Sun, 14 Aug 2011 19:16:50 -0700 Mike Meyer m...@mired.org wrote: [...] If you insist on them being files, then there's not much point in further discussion. And having them in files means you

[fossil-users] new winsrv command: which port does it use?

2011-08-15 Thread Jos Groot Lipman
I have compiled the latest trunk-version with the new winsrv command to test it. It leaves me slightly confused to which port Fossil uses this way. First I do a 'fossil ui' on an open checkout. This claims port 8080 (note: it could also be any other program already using port 8080) Next I do

Re: [fossil-users] New features for merging

2011-08-15 Thread Matt Welland
2011/8/15 Lluís Batlle i Rossell virik...@gmail.com On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 02:41:48AM +, altufa...@mail.com wrote: Me too like fossil because of simplicity of one file / less file clutter. Why can't versionable settings be treated like a wiki or ticket page and versioned inside the