Maybe it should open /dev/null and /dev/urandom before chroot()'ing ?
On Sat, 13 May 2017, Richard Hipp wrote:
On 5/13/17, Olivier R. wrote:
Hello,
I?m running Fossil on Debian Jessie 8.2
(x86_64-debian-jessie-2016-04-06_15:26) at Scaleway.com (VC1S).
In the admin panel, Fossil says:
WA
I run ChiselApp.com now and have no plans to stop doing so -- it's viable
I'd say !
On Sun, 14 May 2017, The Tick wrote:
Sorry for all these questions.
I ran across an exchange from 2013 (I think) that talked about chiselapp.com
shutting down. Obviously it has not done so.
What is the stat
There is a way to upload the repository -- what you are probably doing now
is creating a new repo with the same project code then pushing to that,
which won't work out great.
When you go to "Create Repository" there are 3 options: 1. Create a
new repository; 2. Pull a repository from somewhere
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 09:15:02AM -0500, Roy Keene wrote:
> Maybe it should open /dev/null and /dev/urandom before chroot()'ing ?
At /dev/urandom doesn't need to be used on newer Linux systems,
getentropy/getrandom provide the same service as system call.
Joerg
__
On 5/15/17, Roy Keene wrote:
> Maybe it should open /dev/null and /dev/urandom before chroot()'ing ?
That would be difficult to implement.
--
D. Richard Hipp
d...@sqlite.org
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.
An alternate fix for [2d69772e] so that SEARCH without target behaves the same
both from within an open repo, and with the –R option.
if( g.argc<2 ) return;
blob_init(&pattern, g.argc<3?"":g.argv[2], -1);
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists
On May 15, 2017, at 8:21 AM, Roy Keene wrote:
>
> what you are probably doing now is creating a new repo with the same project
> code then pushing to that, which won't work out great.
To clarify, one of the things Fossil does when it creates a new repository is
to generate a universally unique
I need a pre-compiled 32-bit Linux version of the release fossil
(The same Windows version says: This is fossil version 2.2 [81d7d3f43e]
2017-04-11 20:54:55 UTC)
The download page only offers a 64-bit Linux version.
(I’m locked out from being able to update either fossil or sqlite3 directly
fro
On May 13, 2017, at 6:50 AM, Richard Hipp wrote:
>
> Are you running the commands above as root?
…and if so, I would guess the only reason you’re running it as root is so that
it can listen on port 80, in which case I *strongly* encourage you to bind
Fossil to localhost on a high-numbered rand
On May 15, 2017, at 12:54 PM, Tony Papadimitriou wrote:
>
> I need a pre-compiled 32-bit Linux version of the release fossil
> (The same Windows version says: This is fossil version 2.2 [81d7d3f43e]
> 2017-04-11 20:54:55 UTC)
Here: goo.gl/Tp7Foq
It’s built on a 32-bit CentOS 5 system, statical
On 5/15/2017 9:21 AM, Roy Keene wrote:
There is a way to upload the repository -- what you are probably doing
now is creating a new repo with the same project code then pushing to
that, which won't work out great.
When you go to "Create Repository" there are 3 options: 1. Create a new
repository
On 15 May 2017 at 21:02, The Tick wrote:
> That was exactly what I was doing -- after clicking 'Create Repository' my
> focus was on the form and I was totally oblivious to the additional options
> that had appeared.
just for the record, in the "create repository" form, there's an
"Override proj
On 5/13/2017 5:50 AM, Richard Hipp wrote:
On 5/13/17, Olivier R. wrote:
To launch the server, I simply type:
fossil open repo.fossil
nohup fossil server &
Are you running the commands above as root? If so, Fossil will
automatically put itself in a chroot jail on the directory c
Hello,
Since this was causing us quite a lot of hassle I was wondering what's
the reason to have a crlf-glob in the first place?
Does it really matter in the 21st century if a line is terminated by CR,
LF, or CR/LF anymore?
Cheers
Thomas
___
foss
On May 15, 2017, at 3:27 PM, Thomas wrote:
>
> Does it really matter in the 21st century if a line is terminated by CR, LF,
> or CR/LF anymore?
Notepad.exe in Windows 10 Creator’s Edition still only works properly with
CR+LF. Since that’s the default handler for *.txt on Windows, yes, line en
On 2017-05-15 23:09, Warren Young wrote:
On May 15, 2017, at 3:27 PM, Thomas wrote:
Does it really matter in the 21st century if a line is terminated by CR, LF, or
CR/LF anymore?
Notepad.exe in Windows 10 Creator’s Edition still only works properly with
CR+LF. Since that’s the default han
On May 15, 2017, at 4:16 PM, Thomas wrote:
>
> On 2017-05-15 23:09, Warren Young wrote:
>> On May 15, 2017, at 3:27 PM, Thomas wrote:
>>>
>>> Does it really matter in the 21st century if a line is terminated by CR,
>>> LF, or CR/LF anymore?
>>
>> Notepad.exe
>
> So, after editing a file that
17 matches
Mail list logo