Re: [fossil-users] Why no action on ticket 6981de95b6 ?

I will be in a position to test on Linux and OpenSolaris in a few weeks' time. BSD isn't in the cards, however. (I haven't managed to successfully install a BSD yet.) On 18 June 2010 11:31, TJ Yang wrote: > On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 10:10 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 17, 2010

Re: [fossil-users] Why no action on ticket 6981de95b6 ?

On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 10:10 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 9:39 PM, TJ Yang wrote: >> >> Hi, all >> >> Can someone with check-in privilege act on following ticket ? >> >> http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/tktview?name=6981de95b6 >> >> Richard, please grant me check-in

Re: [fossil-users] Not within an open checkout (Documentation fix)

Now that I have check-in privs, I've checked in an updated quick start that presents the information in a more useful order and summarizes the work flow at the top. It's been checked into a branch named "ttmrichter" at this point for vetting. Check it out and let me know if it's OK. On 16 June 2

Re: [fossil-users] Why no action on ticket 6981de95b6 ?

On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 9:39 PM, TJ Yang wrote: > Hi, all > > Can someone with check-in privilege act on following ticket ? > > http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/tktview?name=6981de95b6 > > Richard, please grant me check-in privilege if you or others has no > interest to correct these two erro

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil plays badly with CGI not on port 80

At 06:07 PM 6/17/2010, Richard Hipp wrote: I think this is a case of thttpd not setting up the HTTP_HOST environment variable correctly I'm guessing thttpd omits the port number. Yes, it does, from the HTTP_HOST variable at least. That would be a mistake on the part of thttpd, if I'm n

[fossil-users] Why no action on ticket 6981de95b6 ?

Hi, all Can someone with check-in privilege act on following ticket ? http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/tktview?name=6981de95b6 Richard, please grant me check-in privilege if you or others has no interest to correct these two errors. I will fix it myself and sync the changes to upstream. --

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil plays badly with CGI not on port 80

On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Ross Berteig wrote: > > So I got thttpd built and running on the DNS-323, and set it up > so that fossil can be run via a simple CGI naming a specific > repository. Now my URLs look like > http://192.168.1.150:8080/r.cgi/example/index assuming that > r.cgi points

[fossil-users] Fossil plays badly with CGI not on port 80

I am in the process of getting fossil to run on my NAS devce, a DLink DNS-323. This beast is an ARM core running linux hosting a RAID made of two 1.5TB SATA drives, and with a cross toolchain in place under Ubuntu it was straightforward to get fossil to run there. However, the DNS-323 already h

Re: [fossil-users] Place to post patches?

On 17 June 2010 16:07, Richard Hipp wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Michal Suchanek > wrote: >> >> Hello >> >> Is there a good place for posting fossil patches? >> >> There are a few which I posted here a while ago. One got some replies >> but the others are just archived in the ML

Re: [fossil-users] Place to post patches?

On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Michal Suchanek wrote: > Hello > > Is there a good place for posting fossil patches? > > There are a few which I posted here a while ago. One got some replies > but the others are just archived in the ML and aging. > > There is no way to attach files (including pa

[fossil-users] Place to post patches?

Hello Is there a good place for posting fossil patches? There are a few which I posted here a while ago. One got some replies but the others are just archived in the ML and aging. There is no way to attach files (including patches) to bug reports so that they won't get forgotten. Thanks Michal