> Git rebase help has a very good graphic to explain what it does:
>
> Assume the following history exists and the current branch is "topic":
>
> A---B---C topic
> /
> D---E---F---G master
>
> From this point, the result of either of the following commands:
>
> git rebase ma
Git rebase help has a very good graphic to explain what it does:
Assume the following history exists and the current branch is "topic":
A---B---C topic
/
D---E---F---G master
From this point, the result of either of the following commands:
git rebase master
git rebase mas
Thanks. This works correctly.
-Original Message-
From: Richard Hipp
To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
Sent: Wed, Jun 23, 2010 8:56 pm
Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Windows build broken?
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 10:43 AM, wrote:
Hi DRH,
I can build fossil from trunk now.
However
Thanks, I liked the description of your workflow. You should put it on
the website.
S.
On Wednesday, June 23, 2010, Richard Hipp wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 3:42 AM, wrote:
>
> Well, my understanding of rebase has changed since then, due to the
> same problem we faced. Git 'forgets' u
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 10:43 AM, wrote:
> Hi DRH,
>
> I can build fossil from trunk now.
>
> However, there seems some issue with date/time. It shows incorrect date:
>
You're right. This was a bug in the current-time implementation of SQLite
on windows. It has now been fixed (both in SQLite a
Hi DRH,
I can build fossil from trunk now.
However, there seems some issue with date/time. It shows incorrect date:
$ rm test.fsl
$ ./fossil new test.fsl
project-id: 6e13be383106646451d79a5eae4f731c84d22135
server-id: f0202d8c43fc11569996c45150aca4740ffd49c6
admin-user: altufaltu (initial passw
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 7:28 AM, Richard Hipp wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 3:44 AM, wrote:
>
>> I'm trying to build 953d293c32 version of fossil for Windows, which
>> seems broken:
>>
>> gcc -g -O2 -o makeheaders .\\src\\makeheaders.c
>> awk "{ printf \"#define MANIFEST_UUID \\\"%%s\\\"\
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 3:44 AM, wrote:
> I'm trying to build 953d293c32 version of fossil for Windows, which
> seems broken:
>
> gcc -g -O2 -o makeheaders .\\src\\makeheaders.c
> awk "{ printf \"#define MANIFEST_UUID \\\"%%s\\\"\n\", $1}"
> .\\src\\..\\manifest.uuid >VERSION.h
> gawk: { printf "
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 3:42 AM, wrote:
> Well, my understanding of rebase has changed since then, due to the
> same problem we faced. Git 'forgets' unpublished versions when doing
> rebase (but it need not - I may still be wrong here). I'm sure if
> fossil implements rebase, it will not forget o
This is a really nice theme, thanks for releasing it!
On 21 June 2010 16:12, wrote:
> I have to say I'd love to see this skin incorporated, very nice work.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: "Richard Hipp"
> Sent: Monday, June 21, 2010 11:01am
> To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
> Subje
I'm trying to build 953d293c32 version of fossil for Windows, which
seems broken:
gcc -g -O2 -o makeheaders .\\src\\makeheaders.c
awk "{ printf \"#define MANIFEST_UUID \\\"%%s\\\"\n\", $1}"
.\\src\\..\\manifest.uuid >VERSION.h
gawk: { printf "#define MANIFEST_UUID \"%%s\"\n", }
gawk:
Well, my understanding of rebase has changed since then, due to the
same problem we faced. Git 'forgets' unpublished versions when doing
rebase (but it need not - I may still be wrong here). I'm sure if
fossil implements rebase, it will not forget old versions.
What I'm interested in is the 'fe
12 matches
Mail list logo
