Re: [fossil-users] fossil for large projects?

2011-01-04 Thread Richard Hipp
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 9:38 PM, Russ Paielli wrote: > OK, let me rephrase my question. Is there any reason to believe that fossil > will not scale up well to a large project? I have very little experience > with SCM systems, and I'm just wondering if fossil was designed with > scalability in mind

Re: [fossil-users] fossil for large projects?

2011-01-04 Thread Joerg Sonnenberger
On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 07:00:27PM -0800, Russ Paielli wrote: > On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 6:43 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger > wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 06:38:54PM -0800, Russ Paielli wrote: > > > My organization currently uses Clearcase for a project with something > > > like 20 developers and 2

Re: [fossil-users] fossil for large projects?

2011-01-04 Thread Russ Paielli
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 6:43 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 06:38:54PM -0800, Russ Paielli wrote: > > My organization currently uses Clearcase for a project with something > > like 20 developers and 2MLOC. Would I be crazy to recommend fossil? > Thanks. > > Can you translat

Re: [fossil-users] fossil for large projects?

2011-01-04 Thread Joerg Sonnenberger
On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 06:38:54PM -0800, Russ Paielli wrote: > My organization currently uses Clearcase for a project with something > like 20 developers and 2MLOC. Would I be crazy to recommend fossil? Thanks. Can you translate that into number of files in a working copy and average size? Joerg

Re: [fossil-users] fossil for large projects?

2011-01-04 Thread Russ Paielli
OK, let me rephrase my question. Is there any reason to believe that fossil will not scale up well to a large project? I have very little experience with SCM systems, and I'm just wondering if fossil was designed with scalability in mind. I have no reason to believe it wasn't, but I'd just like to

Re: [fossil-users] fossil for large projects?

2011-01-04 Thread Remigiusz Modrzejewski
On Jan 4, 2011, at 20:50 , Gour wrote: > Russ> I'd be interested to know if anyone is using fossil for a "large" > Russ> software project. How large? Oh, let's say ten or more > Russ> developers. If so, how is it working out? > > Well, considering that Sqlite3 is used as storage back-end, I beli

Re: [fossil-users] How to fix trouble reported by test-integrity ?

2011-01-04 Thread Andreas Kupries
On 1/4/2011 12:49 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > On 1/4/2011 12:31 PM, Andreas Kupries wrote: > sqlite.fossil _ > fossil: cluster (rid=33544) references unknown artifact > 52afdedf4516cf772f3e99cec16635c1e2a2edcf > Those probably indic

Re: [fossil-users] How to fix trouble reported by test-integrity ?

2011-01-04 Thread Richard Hipp
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Andreas Kupries wrote: > On 1/4/2011 12:31 PM, Andreas Kupries wrote: > >> On 1/4/2011 12:08 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: >> > > sqlite.fossil _ > fossil: cluster (rid=33544) references unknown artifact > 52afdedf4516cf

Re: [fossil-users] How to fix trouble reported by test-integrity ?

2011-01-04 Thread Andreas Kupries
On 1/4/2011 12:31 PM, Andreas Kupries wrote: > On 1/4/2011 12:08 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: sqlite.fossil _ fossil: cluster (rid=33544) references unknown artifact 52afdedf4516cf772f3e99cec16635c1e2a2edcf fossil: cluster (rid=33544) references unkn

Re: [fossil-users] How to fix trouble reported by test-integrity ?

2011-01-04 Thread Andreas Kupries
On 1/4/2011 12:08 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Andreas Kupries > wrote: > > > So I got me the New Year's fossil download, and tried out the new > 'test-integrity' command on some of my local repositories. One of them > reports

Re: [fossil-users] How to fix trouble reported by test-integrity ?

2011-01-04 Thread Richard Hipp
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Andreas Kupries wrote: > > So I got me the New Year's fossil download, and tried out the new > 'test-integrity' command on some of my local repositories. One of them > reports > >bf/dev> fossil test-integrity >fossil: size mismatch on blob rid=129:

[fossil-users] How to fix trouble reported by test-integrity ?

2011-01-04 Thread Andreas Kupries
So I got me the New Year's fossil download, and tried out the new 'test-integrity' command on some of my local repositories. One of them reports bf/dev> fossil test-integrity fossil: size mismatch on blob rid=129: 4541 vs 339 fossil: size mismatch on blob rid=144: 4746

Re: [fossil-users] fossil for large projects?

2011-01-04 Thread Gour
On Tue, 4 Jan 2011 11:03:29 -0800 >> "Russ" == Russ Paielli >> wrote: Russ> I'd be interested to know if anyone is using fossil for a "large" Russ> software project. How large? Oh, let's say ten or more Russ> developers. If so, how is it working out? Well, considering that Sqlite3 is use

[fossil-users] fossil for large projects?

2011-01-04 Thread Russ Paielli
I'd be interested to know if anyone is using fossil for a "large" software project. How large? Oh, let's say ten or more developers. If so, how is it working out? I work in a Clearcase environment, but I work fairly independently, so I am able to get away with using fossil. I would like to encoura

Re: [fossil-users] Hang committing on cygwin

2011-01-04 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
Hello again, with better news. On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 04:31:03PM +0100, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote: > Now we are experiencing a hang after saving the commit message. It's at 100% > of > cpu. We tried a "-g -O0", and attaching gdb, but gdb is not any good at > resolving the call stack while in

[fossil-users] Hang committing on cygwin

2011-01-04 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
Hello, we are not having our best fossil day today. We use fossil in cygwin since months. We build it by a simple "make", and until now it always worked. This time we have kept on updating, rebuilding, and all that, without much troubles related to the specifics of cygwin. Now we are experiencin

Re: [fossil-users] Has anyone tried sharing a repo via DropBox?

2011-01-04 Thread G. Clifford Williams
On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 11:48:15AM +0100, Remigiusz Modrzejewski spake: > > On Jan 3, 2011, at 20:19 , Stephan Beal wrote: > > > For a small project with 1-2 devs who work in different timezones, it might > > be reasonable. And read-only access should never be a problem. The main > > difference f

Re: [fossil-users] WG: Errors during compile in Windows 7 x64

2011-01-04 Thread Richard Hipp
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 4:19 AM, Kohn Bernhard wrote: > Hello, > > > > I just send this email with an attachment (vs2010 solution), but it didn’t > shows up in the fossil-user mailforum. > > > > How can I share the vs2010 solution? > Please send email directly to me. > > > Best regards > > Ber

[fossil-users] Problems merging with renames

2011-01-04 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
Hello, we had a bad merge, using the latest released fossil (2010-01-01). The merge was removing files it should not remove. Hence I write to the list alerting on the problem. We tracked the problem, and attached proposed patches, in two tickets: http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/c9d454153e h

Re: [fossil-users] Has anyone tried sharing a repo via DropBox?

2011-01-04 Thread Remigiusz Modrzejewski
On Jan 3, 2011, at 20:19 , Stephan Beal wrote: > For a small project with 1-2 devs who work in different timezones, it might > be reasonable. And read-only access should never be a problem. The main > difference for people "watching" the repo would be that they never need to > "fossil pull" becau

[fossil-users] WG: Errors during compile in Windows 7 x64

2011-01-04 Thread Kohn Bernhard
Hello, I just send this email with an attachment (vs2010 solution), but it didn't shows up in the fossil-user mailforum. How can I share the vs2010 solution? Best regards Bernhard Von: Kohn Bernhard Gesendet: Dienstag, 04. Jänner 2011 08:52 An: 'fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org' Betreff: AW