Re: [fossil-users] Bikeshedding opportunity: back to the topic of "libfossil"'s name

On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Stephan Beal wrote: > On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 9:50 PM, Andreas Kupries > wrote: >> >> Mirroring of fossil to git ? >> I use >> >> http://core.tcl.tk/akupries/fossil2git/index > > > @Chad: Andreas wins :) There was a competition ? Ah well. I will celebrate wit

Re: [fossil-users] Bikeshedding opportunity: back to the topic of "libfossil"'s name

On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 9:50 PM, Andreas Kupries wrote: > Mirroring of fossil to git ? > I use > > http://core.tcl.tk/akupries/fossil2git/index @Chad: Andreas wins :) i'll take a look at that when i'm feel snarky enough to export code from Fossil into the belly of my arch-nemesis. So far my

Re: [fossil-users] Bikeshedding opportunity: back to the topic of "libfossil"'s name

Mirroring of fossil to git ? I use http://core.tcl.tk/akupries/fossil2git/index On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Themba Fletcher wrote: > On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Chad Perrin wrote: >> >> On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 10:45:08AM +0200, Stephan Beal wrote: >> > On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 4:

Re: [fossil-users] Bikeshedding opportunity: back to the topic of "libfossil"'s name

On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Chad Perrin wrote: > On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 10:45:08AM +0200, Stephan Beal wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 4:34 AM, Chad Perrin wrote: > > > > > > mirror should be set up on GitHub to boost its search engine ranking a > > > little bit (with a prominent menti

Re: [fossil-users] Bikeshedding opportunity: back to the topic of "libfossil"'s name

On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 08:46:43PM +0200, Stephan Beal wrote: > On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 7:30 PM, Chad Perrin wrote: > > > > An acquaintance and I might be able to contribute to it in the meantime. > > > > We're interested in a C API for Fossil being available for > > production use some time in th

Re: [fossil-users] Bikeshedding opportunity: back to the topic of "libfossil"'s name

On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 7:30 PM, Chad Perrin wrote: > I'd like to be kept abreast of how you accomplish that in an automated > manner. I too would like to do that with some projects of mine, but > it's low enough on the priority list for my own stuff right now that I > won't get to it for a whi

Re: [fossil-users] Fingerprinting a fossil repository

Yeah, something on that order. I need to refine it (but what I have does work, it's just clunky). Still would be nice to simply be able to say "fossil fingerprint"... On 08/22/2013 06:26 PM, Stephan Beal wrote: > On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Ron Aaron > wrote: > >

Re: [fossil-users] Bikeshedding opportunity: back to the topic of "libfossil"'s name

On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 10:45:08AM +0200, Stephan Beal wrote: > On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 4:34 AM, Chad Perrin wrote: > > > > mirror should be set up on GitHub to boost its search engine ranking a > > little bit (with a prominent mention of its canonical version control > > repository being elsewher

Re: [fossil-users] Bikeshedding opportunity: back to the topic of "libfossil"'s name

On Aug 22, 2013 7:58 AM, "Stephan Beal" wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Stephan Beal wrote: >> >> On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 4:34 AM, Chad Perrin wrote: >>> >>> I'd say the name should just be set in stone as libfossil now, and a >> >> >> i tend to agree. But then we'll have to find an

Re: [fossil-users] Fingerprinting a fossil repository

On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Ron Aaron wrote: > Adding 'select mtime from config order by mtime;' helps, but it's too > sensitive (the update time is there, as are a few other things which > would change without the repo itself changing). > why not: { ...Joerg's code... echo 'select nam

Re: [fossil-users] Fingerprinting a fossil repository

That is a nice start. Unfortunately, it doesn't catch config changes. Adding 'select mtime from config order by mtime;' helps, but it's too sensitive (the update time is there, as are a few other things which would change without the repo itself changing). Food for thought, though. On 08/22/201

Re: [fossil-users] Fingerprinting a fossil repository

On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 5:07 PM, Ron Aaron wrote: > Em, rsync doesn't help. ...Secondly, because I'm putting the files > 'on the cloud', and rsync can't help me there. > Ah, of course. i suspect that Joerg's suggestion (or some derivative) is probably the easiest. -- - stephan beal

Re: [fossil-users] Fingerprinting a fossil repository

Em, rsync doesn't help. Firstly, because I'm doing my backup on an encrypted version of the entire fossil repo (not the individual files), which changes in its entirety if after a 'fossil upd'. Secondly, because I'm putting the files 'on the cloud', and rsync can't help me there. On 08/22/2013

Re: [fossil-users] Bikeshedding opportunity: back to the topic of "libfossil"'s name

On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Stephan Beal wrote: > On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 4:34 AM, Chad Perrin wrote: > >> I'd say the name should just be set in stone as libfossil now, and a >> > > i tend to agree. But then we'll have to find another bikeshedding topic > ;). (Oh, i've got plenty of them l

Re: [fossil-users] Fingerprinting a fossil repository

On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 06:41:58AM +0300, Ron Aaron wrote: > So I tried to find a way to discern whether or not a repo was *really* > different, and I hit upon the following. I think it would be nice if > there were an easier way. echo 'select uuid from blob order by blob' | fossil sqlite | fossi

Re: [fossil-users] Fingerprinting a fossil repository

On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 5:41 AM, Ron Aaron wrote: > So I tried to find a way to discern whether or not a repo was *really* > different, and I hit upon the following. I think it would be nice if > there were an easier way. > Have you tried rsync? rsync -qza -e ssh *.fsl me@remote:/remote/dir/.

Re: [fossil-users] Bikeshedding opportunity: back to the topic of "libfossil"'s name

On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 4:34 AM, Chad Perrin wrote: > http://chiselapp.com/user/cutterpillow/repository/fossil-iOS/ > > There's a libfossil.cpp in the src directory of the source tree > (requires anonymous login to view, naturally). > i'm not worried about collisions of individual files, jus

Re: [fossil-users] strange `fossil diff ' behaviour

On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 00:55:56 +0200, Matt Welland wrote: On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 2:29 PM, j. van den hoff wrote: On Wed, 21 Aug 2013 23:19:46 +0200, Stephan Beal wrote: On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 11:07 PM, Mark Janssen >wrote: The fossil rebuild logic uses a two pass algorithm. I am not q