[fossil-users] Version 1.27

2013-09-11 Thread Richard Hipp
Fossil version 1.27 has been tagged and precompiled binaries have been uploaded to http://www.fossil-scm.org/download.html I do this infrequently enough that I keep forgetting exactly how things were compiled the previous time. So please try out the precompiled binaries and let me know if you

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27

2013-09-11 Thread Michai Ramakers
On 11 September 2013 16:03, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: I started a wiki page (http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/wiki?name=Release+Build+How-To) describing how the precompiled binaries are produced. If adjustments need to be made for compatibility purposes, please let me know. For

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27

2013-09-11 Thread Richard Hipp
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 10:36 AM, Michai Ramakers m.ramak...@gmail.comwrote: For my information: is WinXP still an 'officially supported' platform? I realise it's a bit old, but I happen to use fossil on that platform, occasionally. I don't have a WinXP system to test on. But maybe some of

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27

2013-09-11 Thread Stephan Beal
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Warren Young war...@etr-usa.com wrote: Software can't go unmaintained indefinitely without consequences. The primary consequence being that people eventually upgrade ;). -- - stephan beal http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/ http://gplus.to/sgbeal

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27

2013-09-11 Thread Michai Ramakers
On 11 September 2013 16:03, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: Fossil version 1.27 has been tagged and precompiled binaries have been uploaded to http://www.fossil-scm.org/download.html I do this infrequently enough that I keep forgetting exactly how things were compiled the previous time.

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27

2013-09-11 Thread Paolo Bolzoni
Maybe it is time to leave Windows? On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Warren Young war...@etr-usa.com wrote: Software can't go unmaintained indefinitely without consequences. The primary consequence being that people

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27

2013-09-11 Thread Warren Young
On 9/11/2013 08:59, John Long wrote: On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 08:49:14AM -0600, Warren Young wrote: Only 7 months left of MS support: http://goo.gl/dtpQj4 So what? After the EOL date, XP will quickly start bit rotting. You can predict the near future by looking at the state of Windows 2000

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27

2013-09-11 Thread Stephan Beal
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Michai Ramakers m.ramak...@gmail.comwrote: slightly related question: is there, or will there be, a regression-test suite for fossil? (I read about the sqlite testing method, which is truly amazing.) Fossil's testing infrastructure is not as amazing as

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27

2013-09-11 Thread Jan Nijtmans
2013/9/11 Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org: I don't have a WinXP system to test on. But maybe some of the other developers do WinXP should work fine, I tested fossil 1.25 or so on it. And as far as I know there are no fundamental differences in Windows API usage, so it still should work fine.

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27

2013-09-11 Thread John Long
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 08:49:14AM -0600, Warren Young wrote: On 9/11/2013 08:36, Michai Ramakers wrote: For my information: is WinXP still an 'officially supported' platform? I realise it's a bit old, but I happen to use fossil on that platform, occasionally. There are plenty of people still

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27

2013-09-11 Thread Warren Young
On 9/11/2013 08:36, Michai Ramakers wrote: For my information: is WinXP still an 'officially supported' platform? I realise it's a bit old, but I happen to use fossil on that platform, occasionally. Only 7 months left of MS support: http://goo.gl/dtpQj4 After that, no more security patches.

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27

2013-09-11 Thread djgoku
This worked on Windows 2008 R2 64-bit, Windows 7 32-bit, Mountain Lion 10.8.4 64-bit. Jonathan Otuska On Sep 11, 2013, at 9:03 AM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: Fossil version 1.27 has been tagged and precompiled binaries have been uploaded to http://www.fossil-scm.org/download.html

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27

2013-09-11 Thread Michai Ramakers
On 11 September 2013 16:36, Michai Ramakers m.ramak...@gmail.com wrote: On 11 September 2013 16:03, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: I started a wiki page (http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/wiki?name=Release+Build+How-To) describing how the precompiled binaries are produced. If adjustments

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27

2013-09-11 Thread John Long
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 09:08:05AM -0600, Warren Young wrote: On 9/11/2013 08:59, John Long wrote: On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 08:49:14AM -0600, Warren Young wrote: Only 7 months left of MS support: http://goo.gl/dtpQj4 So what? After the EOL date, XP will quickly start bit rotting. Given my

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27

2013-09-11 Thread Samuel Debionne
Thank you for this release. The manifest and manifest.uuid is missing from the source tarball. Samuel Le 11/09/2013 16:03, Richard Hipp a écrit : Fossil version 1.27 has been tagged and precompiled binaries have been uploaded to http://www.fossil-scm.org/download.html I do this infrequently

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27

2013-09-11 Thread Richard Hipp
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Samuel Debionne samuel.debio...@ujf-grenoble.fr wrote: The manifest and manifest.uuid is missing from the source tarball. Thanks for the report. This should be fixed now. (Please let me know if you find otherwise.) I have also updated to release-build wiki

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27

2013-09-11 Thread djgoku
I didn't know there was an official testing document, I just dropped the exe in place and ran: fossil server file.fossil I mostly just use fossil for the wiki which it looked fine so just to clarify I just glanced over the Wiki portion of Fossil and nothing else. Jonathan Otsuka On Sep 11,

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27

2013-09-11 Thread James Turner
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 10:52:44AM -0500, djg...@gmail.com wrote: I didn't know there was an official testing document, I just dropped the exe in place and ran: fossil server file.fossil I mostly just use fossil for the wiki which it looked fine so just to clarify I just glanced over the

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27

2013-09-11 Thread Hakki Dogusan
Hi, 11-09-2013 17:03 tarihinde, Richard Hipp yazdı: Fossil version 1.27 has been tagged and precompiled binaries have been uploaded to http://www.fossil-scm.org/download.html I do this infrequently enough that I keep forgetting exactly how things were compiled the previous time. So please try

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27

2013-09-11 Thread Hakki Dogusan
Hi, 11-09-2013 18:40 tarihinde, Hakki Dogusan yazdı: Hi, 11-09-2013 17:03 tarihinde, Richard Hipp yazdı: Fossil version 1.27 has been tagged and precompiled binaries have been uploaded to http://www.fossil-scm.org/download.html [snip] I'm getting fossil.exe is not a valid Win32 application

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27

2013-09-11 Thread Matt Welland
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 7:03 AM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: Fossil version 1.27 has been tagged and precompiled binaries have been uploaded to http://www.fossil-scm.org/download.html I do this infrequently enough that I keep forgetting exactly how things were compiled the previous

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27

2013-09-11 Thread Matt Welland
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Matt Welland estifo...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 7:03 AM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: Fossil version 1.27 has been tagged and precompiled binaries have been uploaded to http://www.fossil-scm.org/download.html I do this infrequently

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27

2013-09-11 Thread Richard Hipp
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 1:34 PM, Matt Welland estifo...@gmail.com wrote: From a quick browse of the timeline it looks like the ssh changes did not make it in to this release. What needs to be done to make adding those changes to the next release possible? I'd like to start moving those

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27

2013-09-11 Thread Stephan Beal
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 7:36 PM, Matt Welland estifo...@gmail.com wrote: Sorry, of course the change summary is on the web page. I think it would be helpful to paste it into announcement emails. See the bottom half of the download page link he sent: http://www.fossil-scm.org/download.html

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27

2013-09-11 Thread Jarek Lewandowski
On Windows platform. W dniu 2013-09-11 21:00, Jarek Lewandowski pisze: I have problem with https: HTTPS: Fossil has been compiled without SSL support jl ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27

2013-09-11 Thread David Mason
On 11 September 2013 11:00, djg...@gmail.com wrote: This worked on Windows 2008 R2 64-bit, Windows 7 32-bit, Mountain Lion 10.8.4 64-bit. and Snow Leopard 10.6.8 (and it's i386 so should work everywhere) Well done! Thanks ../Dave ___ fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27

2013-09-11 Thread Jarek Lewandowski
I have problem with https: HTTPS: Fossil has been compiled without SSL support jl ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27

2013-09-11 Thread Richard Hipp
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Jarek Lewandowski maxja...@softleg.plwrote: I have problem with https: HTTPS: Fossil has been compiled without SSL support I new windows binary with SSL support has been uploaded. -- D. Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27

2013-09-11 Thread Jarek Lewandowski
This version works ok. W dniu 2013-09-11 21:42, Richard Hipp pisze: On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Jarek Lewandowski maxja...@softleg.pl mailto:maxja...@softleg.pl wrote: I have problem with https: HTTPS: Fossil has been compiled without SSL support I new windows binary with

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27

2013-09-11 Thread Kees Nuyt
[Default] On Wed, 11 Sep 2013 10:03:58 -0400, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: Fossil version 1.27 has been tagged and precompiled binaries have been uploaded to http://www.fossil-scm.org/download.html Thanks a ton, Richard! -- Groet, Cordialement, Pozdrawiam, Regards, Kees Nuyt

Re: [fossil-users] RFC before trunking 'usage' command

2013-09-11 Thread Kees Nuyt
[Default] On Wed, 11 Sep 2013 22:58:56 +0200, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi, all, Once 1.27 officially goes out the door, i plan on pulling the new 'usage' command into the trunk (for 1.28). My question to you is: is there anyone who finds the idea of fossil recording which

[fossil-users] RFC before trunking 'usage' command

2013-09-11 Thread Stephan Beal
Hi, all, Once 1.27 officially goes out the door, i plan on pulling the new 'usage' command into the trunk (for 1.28). My question to you is: is there anyone who finds the idea of fossil recording which commands (not their arguments) and the times of their usage in the local checkout database

Re: [fossil-users] RFC before trunking 'usage' command

2013-09-11 Thread Stephan Beal
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 11:26 PM, Kees Nuyt k.n...@zonnet.nl wrote: I wouldn't mind logging the arguments as well, especially for commands that modify the repository or a stash. i considered it, but the code overhead just wasn't worth it at that time of night. One of these days i'll miss

Re: [fossil-users] RFC before trunking 'usage' command

2013-09-11 Thread Stephan Beal
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 11:56 PM, Kees Nuyt k.n...@zonnet.nl wrote: I mean the class of commands that doesn't change anything to a repository or a checkout is not interesting for logging. That's a very good point - didn't think of that. We could also do this at the db level - log them all but

Re: [fossil-users] RFC before trunking 'usage' command

2013-09-11 Thread Stephan Beal
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 11:58 PM, B Harder brad.har...@gmail.com wrote: fossil set tracker [on|off] ? IIRC Trac was Fossil's predecessor for ticket tracking, and tracker always implies tickets to me (as a by-day/by-night developer). How about... fossil set nsa-mode on|off ;) That reminds me

Re: [fossil-users] RFC before trunking 'usage' command

2013-09-11 Thread Stephan Beal
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 12:08 AM, Ron Wilson ronw.m...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 5:58 PM, B Harder brad.har...@gmail.com wrote: fossil set tracker [on|off] ? Or 'fossil set cmdhist [on|off]' i like cmdhist but my fingers don't like typing it :/. cmdhist. Just feels awkward

Re: [fossil-users] RFC before trunking 'usage' command

2013-09-11 Thread Ron Wilson
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 5:58 PM, B Harder brad.har...@gmail.com wrote: fossil set tracker [on|off] ? Or 'fossil set cmdhist [on|off]' Good idea. ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org

Re: [fossil-users] RFC before trunking 'usage' command

2013-09-11 Thread Ron Wilson
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 5:56 PM, Kees Nuyt k.n...@zonnet.nl wrote: [Default] On Wed, 11 Sep 2013 23:32:10 +0200, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: usage - commandtrace or commandhistory or cmdtrace or cmdhistory i think 3 of those might mess up the column alignment in 'help' ;).

Re: [fossil-users] RFC before trunking 'usage' command

2013-09-11 Thread B Harder
fossil set tracker [on|off] ? On Sep 11, 2013 2:32 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 11:26 PM, Kees Nuyt k.n...@zonnet.nl wrote: I wouldn't mind logging the arguments as well, especially for commands that modify the repository or a stash. i considered

Re: [fossil-users] RFC before trunking 'usage' command

2013-09-11 Thread Kees Nuyt
[Default] On Wed, 11 Sep 2013 23:32:10 +0200, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: I wouldn't be interested in logging query-class commands, like fossil ls, fossil status, fossil timeline Do you mean the SQL code itself? No, I now realize query is a confusing word. I mean the class

[fossil-users] Autosync: Too bad git doesn't have it...

2013-09-11 Thread Richard Hipp
It appears that autosync would have saved Linus Torvalds from losing some work yesterday. See http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1309.1/01669.html for details. Bummer. -- D. Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org ___ fossil-users mailing list

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27

2013-09-11 Thread Martin Gagnon
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: Fossil version 1.27 has been tagged and precompiled binaries have been uploaded to http://www.fossil-scm.org/download.html I do this infrequently enough that I keep forgetting exactly how things were compiled the previous

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27

2013-09-11 Thread Christopher Vance
Versions of OpenBSD before 5.2 are obsolete and unsupported. On 12 September 2013 10:35, Martin Gagnon eme...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: Fossil version 1.27 has been tagged and precompiled binaries have been uploaded to

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27

2013-09-11 Thread Richard Hipp
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Martin Gagnon eme...@gmail.com wrote: I notice from your Release+Build+How+To wiki, you build the OpenBSD release from devious free shell service. I also have an account on devious and I just notice they recently upgrade from OpenBSD 4.7 to 4.8. So I guess we

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27

2013-09-11 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Richard Hipp on Wed, 11 Sep 2013 20:45:25 -0400: Changed to a more generic 4.x. Updated version numbers for MacOS and Linux in the same way. For OpenBSD it is probably best to just leave the version on which it was compiled. The libraries are not likely to be present unless

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27

2013-09-11 Thread Carson Chittom
Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com writes: Fossil's testing infrastructure is not as amazing as sqlite's. For each release we (normally several of us) run through the following checklist: http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/doc/trunk/test/release-checklist.wiki Can I just say, the inclusion

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27

2013-09-11 Thread Carson Chittom
Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org writes: On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Martin Gagnon eme...@gmail.com wrote: I notice from your Release+Build+How+To wiki, you build the OpenBSD release from devious free shell service. I also have an account on devious and I just notice they recently upgrade