Re: [fossil-users] Questions about wiki linking to non-branch artifact IDs/images

2015-10-21 Thread Tony Papadimitriou 
Similar problem here.  I thought I would get the image to display as part of 
the Wiki page and not as an attachment link.


Is there a way to make the attached image display directly when opening the 
wiki page?  (I don't mind the attachment link too much -- if there is no 
other way -- but the ideal would be to have the image display directly.)


-Original Message- 
From: The Tick

Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2015 3:25 AM
To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Questions about wiki linking to non-branch 
artifact IDs/images


On 10/19/2015 9:36 AM, Richard Hipp wrote:

On 10/19/15, Tony Papadimitriou  wrote:


My question is how can I add this image to the repo in a way that it is 
not

part of any branch or ticket (e.g., attachment to a ticket)?
I only need it for the purpose of being shown in the wiki page but I do 
not

want it to be part of any checkout or ticket.



Add the image as an attachment to the wiki page.  Then edit the wiki
page to reference the attachment.  (I remember adding that capability
way back when I was first designing Fossil, but I haven't actually
used it so I don't remember the exact syntax.)



This is similar to what I want to do so I gave it a try--I added an
image to a wiki page as an attachment. It's not what I want. It adds
text to the bottom of the page that says "Attachments".

How can I remove the attachment now?

Perhaps if I knew what "artifacts" or "artifact ids" were, I could
figure it out. Are there any docs on all this terminology?
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users 


___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] socks proxy fossil sync

2015-10-21 Thread Warren Young 
On Oct 20, 2015, at 5:21 AM, Richard Hipp  wrote:
> 
> http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/doc/trunk/www/quickstart.wiki#proxy

SOCKS is a completely different protocol from HTTP.  It was a common way to 
allow a privately-addressed LAN access the Internet through a border gateway 
back in the days before NAT and $50 do-everything SOHO routers became common.

It’s basically a dead protocol these days.  There is no reason Fossil should 
implement it.  Wrappers like tsocks are indeed the right way to use SOCKS in 
2015.
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] Questions about wiki linking to non-branch artifact IDs/images

2015-10-21 Thread Andy Bradford 
Thus said The Tick on Tue, 20 Oct 2015 19:25:04 -0500:

> How can I remove the attachment now?

Click on  the details  link next  to the attachment.  There is  a Delete
button there. All it does, really, is delete the link from the Wiki page
to the  artifact. The artifact does  still exist and will  be accessible
via the artifact.

So, in  fact, you  don't have to  keep the attachment  link in  the Wiki
page. You can just add the attachment,  delete the link, and then add an
img tag in your Wiki that points to the artifact.

Andy
-- 
TAI64 timestamp: 400056286aa5


___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] Questions about wiki linking to non-branch artifact IDs/images

2015-10-21 Thread Andy Bradford 
Thus said The Tick on Tue, 20 Oct 2015 19:25:04 -0500:

> This is similar  to what I want to  do so I gave it a  try--I added an
> image to a wiki  page as an attachment. It's not what  I want. It adds
> text to the bottom of the page that says "Attachments".

Did you edit the Wiki and add something like the following?



Take care to use the right MIME type for the image.

> Perhaps if  I knew what  "artifacts" or  "artifact ids" were,  I could
> figure it out. Are there any docs on all this terminology?

Click on the details  link next to the attachment. It  will give you the
artifact ID (or UUID as some call it) that can be used in references.

Andyk
-- 
TAI64 timestamp: 4000562868f2


___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] Questions about wiki linking to non-branch artifact IDs/images

2015-10-21 Thread Andy Bradford 
Thus said "Tony Papadimitriou" on Mon, 19 Oct 2015 16:24:49 +0300:

> My question is how  can I add this image to the repo  in a way that it
> is not part of any branch or ticket (e.g., attachment to a ticket)?

Attach it to the  Wiki page. Then add an img tag to  the Wiki page using
the /raw command:



You can get the  UUID of the artifact by clicking on  the details of the
attachment.

Here's documentation on the /raw command:

http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/help?cmd=/raw

Fossil proper  actually uses  Embedded Documentation  via /doc  to serve
images  within  its   pages.  For  example,  all  the   images  in  this
documentation are in the www repository directory, but served via /doc:

http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/doc/trunk/www/branching.wiki

Andy
-- 
TAI64 timestamp: 4000562867dc


___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] Questions about wiki linking to non-branch artifact IDs/images

2015-10-21 Thread Stephan Beal 
The logo is a special case handled in the site-level config iirc.

- stephan
(Sent from a mobile device, possibly from bed. Please excuse brevity,
typos, and top-posting.)
On Oct 21, 2015 19:56, "Ron W"  wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 9:34 AM, Tony Papadimitriou  wrote:
>
>> Similar problem here.  I thought I would get the image to display as part
>> of the Wiki page and not as an attachment link.
>>
>> Is there a way to make the attached image display directly when opening
>> the wiki page?  (I don't mind the attachment link too much -- if there is
>> no other way -- but the ideal would be to have the image display directly.)
>>
>
> One way would be to use an HTML img tag with the URL from the attachment
> link. Example:
>  http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/doc/trunk/www/fossil3.gif
> ">
>
> Richard mentioned syntax was added to Fossil's wiki mark up, but didn't
> remember the syntax.
>
> Fossil's Mark Down syntax has support for inline images. Presumably, you
> can use the file name or artifact ID of the image instead of an URL.
> Example:
>   ![Fossil Logo](fossil3.gif)
>   ![Fossil Logo](0fa38d60655faf)
>   ![Fossil Logo](
> http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/doc/trunk/www/fossil3.gif)
>
> (In the Fossil website, the logo is not an attachment, the file name
> probably would not work, but maybe if it were attached to a wiki page, the
> name would work.)
>
>
> ___
> fossil-users mailing list
> fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
> http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
>
>
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] Questions about wiki linking to non-branch artifact IDs/images

2015-10-21 Thread Ron W 
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 9:34 AM, Tony Papadimitriou  wrote:

> Similar problem here.  I thought I would get the image to display as part
> of the Wiki page and not as an attachment link.
>
> Is there a way to make the attached image display directly when opening
> the wiki page?  (I don't mind the attachment link too much -- if there is
> no other way -- but the ideal would be to have the image display directly.)
>

One way would be to use an HTML img tag with the URL from the attachment
link. Example:
 http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/doc/trunk/www/fossil3.gif;>

Richard mentioned syntax was added to Fossil's wiki mark up, but didn't
remember the syntax.

Fossil's Mark Down syntax has support for inline images. Presumably, you
can use the file name or artifact ID of the image instead of an URL.
Example:
  ![Fossil Logo](fossil3.gif)
  ![Fossil Logo](0fa38d60655faf)
  ![Fossil Logo](
http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/doc/trunk/www/fossil3.gif)

(In the Fossil website, the logo is not an attachment, the file name
probably would not work, but maybe if it were attached to a wiki page, the
name would work.)
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] Questions about wiki linking to non-branch artifact IDs/images

2015-10-21 Thread Ron W 
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Stephan Beal  wrote:

> The logo is a special case handled in the site-level config iirc.
>
I only used it as an example because it was the only image file I found on
the Fossil site. (Only glanced through several pages that seemed likely
candidates to have images.)
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] Search for Tech-notes

2015-10-21 Thread jungle Boogie 
On 21 October 2015 at 03:26, Michael Keuter  wrote:
> Do I make a mistake or is the feature of searching Tech-notes not implemented 
> (yet)?
>
> Michael
>
> http://www.mksolutions.info


Based on the drop down here:
https://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/search

I don't think it's implemented.

Also, based on this:
https://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/artifact/b02a73b942028631eacf484ae3f83a3a4edd3518?txt=1=18,19

I come to the same conclusion.

-- 
---
inum: 883510009027723
sip: jungleboo...@sip2sip.info
xmpp: jungle-boo...@jit.si
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] Questions about wiki linking to non-branch artifact IDs/images

2015-10-21 Thread Joe Mistachkin 

On trunk, in contexts where TH1 is allowed (not wiki?), you should now be
able to do:

set image [encode64 [artifact trunk path/to/some.png]]


--
Joe Mistachkin

___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] socks proxy fossil sync

2015-10-21 Thread Andy Bradford 
Thus said Warren Young on Wed, 21 Oct 2015 08:45:33 -0600:

> It's basically a  dead protocol these days. There is  no reason Fossil
> should implement it. Wrappers like tsocks  are indeed the right way to
> use SOCKS in 2015.

I don't think it's exactly dead yet. I still find it quite convenient to
use with browsers and an SSH tunnel. Setting up a SOCKS proxy tunnel via
SSH is extremely more simple/easy than setting up a VPN.

But I certainly agree that Fossil needn't support it.

Andy
-- 
TAI64 timestamp: 400056283fe1


___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

[fossil-users] Search for Tech-notes

2015-10-21 Thread Michael Keuter 
Hi list,

when I search in the Fossil timeline (v1.33), I get no search results from 
Tech-notes (neither the Timeline comment, nor the Wiki content of the 
Tech-note).
I use "*" as Document Glob List for searching all files. All search options are 
checked.

Do I make a mistake or is the feature of searching Tech-notes not implemented 
(yet)?

Michael

http://www.mksolutions.info




___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] Time to release Fossil version 1.34?

2015-10-21 Thread Jan Nijtmans 
2015-10-20 19:51 GMT+02:00 Joe Mistachkin :
> Jan Nijtmans wrote:
>>
>> It turns out that the cause of this problem is the following commit:
>> 
>> so I backed it out. My local trunk build doesn't show the problem
>> any more.
>>
>
> Actually, it appears you backed out two check-ins.  The original one and
> the follow-up that fixed the timeline issue it had.

Yes, that was on purpose. Since the second commit fixed a problem in
the first one, only backing out the first would would result in left-over
dead code.

> I've moved the backout off trunk so the issues that remain, if any, can
> be fixed prior to the release.

It's up to you (or Richard) to review it. Please don't take too long, it's
only a few lines of code. And people are already complaining about
this issue.

Regards,
 Jan Nijtmans
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users