Re: [fossil-users] fossil timeline behaviour change from 1.24 to 1.29 to 1.30

2014-10-23 Thread Jan Nijtmans
t means, I would prefer to keep this part as it is now by default. Sorry ;-( Re-using the -v/--verbose option wouldn't be a good idea either, as this options is used for displaying the modified files in addition. That leaves implementing an additional option as the only viable one, IMHO

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil CGI mystery: crashing at repositories

2014-11-04 Thread Jan Nijtmans
x27;t make sense at all Thanks, Taras, for your report! (although docker images for fossil can be created now, it still doesn't work 100% as I expect, still experimenting - trying to get it right for Fossil 1.30 . ) Regards, Jan Nijtmans ___

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil CGI mystery: crashing at repositories

2014-11-04 Thread Jan Nijtmans
"fossil server" sets the server-code, while the project-code is set by the first "fossil sync". Then we have a kind of "virgin" template repository which takes the project-id of the first repo it is syncing with .. but it's not trivial ... Regards, Jan

Re: [fossil-users] Excessively long path length breaks working copy on Windows 7

2014-11-16 Thread Jan Nijtmans
hat it's worth it, maybe I implement it some day .. ) Regards, Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] Corrupt line endings in cat/finfo on Windows with CR+LF files

2014-11-25 Thread Jan Nijtmans
; I think fossil should do the same in this case. That is a valid request in my view. Regards, Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] Corrupt line endings in cat/finfo on Windows with CR+LF files

2014-11-26 Thread Jan Nijtmans
plicated, so line endings are no longer CR+LF, but instead > CR+CR+LF ... which is ... a problem. See: <http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/f2fc37c063> Thanks for your report! Regards, Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-users mailing li

Re: [fossil-users] Corrupt line endings in cat/finfo on Windows with CR+LF files

2014-11-26 Thread Jan Nijtmans
2014-11-26 11:13 GMT+01:00 Jan Nijtmans : > See: > <http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/f2fc37c063> > > Thanks for your report! A related problem on win32: C:\Users\me>fossil cat test/utf16be.txt �� T h i s f i l e c o n t a i n s u t f - 1 6 b e t e x t .

Re: [fossil-users] Error in Windows with Makefile.mingw

2014-11-26 Thread Jan Nijtmans
to do executions in stead of the msys shell, which has quite different quote handling. Better: use msys make. I'm open to suggestions how to fix this. Regards, Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org h

Re: [fossil-users] Check your repos! Was: clone/sqlite error

2014-11-27 Thread Jan Nijtmans
se files too. Could those become corrupt as well? Regards, Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] Cygwin fossil behaviour

2014-12-17 Thread Jan Nijtmans
e use that in your cygwin environment. Regards, Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] Creating a commit without a parent

2015-01-22 Thread Jan Nijtmans
ith missing content See also: close Regards, Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] CTE in ticket report

2015-01-22 Thread Jan Nijtmans
2015-01-22 18:20 GMT+01:00 Sean Woods: > Can the logic be updated so that it checks for WITH, in addition to > SELECT, so that we/I can use CTEs? <http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/ae72a652a7> Thanks for the suggestion! Regards,

Re: [fossil-users] Creating a commit without a parent

2015-01-22 Thread Jan Nijtmans
e should be are gone. It's up to you how to use that. Regards, Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

[fossil-users] BUG: /doc pages on "ckout" not rendered correctly any more.

2015-01-29 Thread Jan Nijtmans
t;http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/info/cfcd9b87dcf54a16> Hope this helps. Regards, Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] BUG: /doc pages on "ckout" not rendered correctly any more.

2015-01-29 Thread Jan Nijtmans
2015-01-29 11:05 GMT+01:00 Jan Nijtmans : > When starting "fossil ui" locally and then opening the following URL: > > <http://localhost:8080/doc/ckout/www/changes.wiki> > > This page is not rendered correctly any more. With fossil > 1.30 this still was OK. Bi

Re: [fossil-users] No "extras" files when built with mingw32-4.0-gcc-4.8.1

2015-02-20 Thread Jan Nijtmans
lease it. My advise would be to abandon MinGW 4.0 (as their developers did) and go back to 3.x, or switch to MinGW-w64. Regards, Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] compiling on branches svn-import* are broken

2015-02-22 Thread Jan Nijtmans
2015-02-22 16:17 GMT+01:00 Martin Gagnon : > I don't know for msvc 2012, but it compile fine on MinGW. > (with small warning that have to be fixed) > > Unfortunately I don't have access to a msvc 2012 compiler right now. Should be fixed now. Thanks! Regar

Re: [fossil-users] Tags and unhide

2015-02-24 Thread Jan Nijtmans
ch which has the "hidden" tag, this tag has to be set explicitely. Regards, Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] JavaScript error in

2015-02-26 Thread Jan Nijtmans
r("Expecting element with ID "+x); >> else return e;} > ^- Close curly brace >> > > What am I overlooking? Possible workaround (which is hardly more complicated) here: <http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/e7ec49815b988811> Regards,

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil's reported app name under Windows firewall

2015-03-01 Thread Jan Nijtmans
ght "FileDescription" in the resource to be used this way. Regards, Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] Justification for two-step mv and rm

2015-03-06 Thread Jan Nijtmans
ave as rm/mv do now. Any objections against adding "fossil forget" as alias to "fossil rm" If not, I'll be glad to add it, awaiting further discussion. Regards, Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] Justification for two-step mv and rm

2015-03-09 Thread Jan Nijtmans
2015-03-06 16:58 GMT+01:00 Jan Danielsson : > On 06/03/15 15:10, Jan Nijtmans wrote: >> Any objections against adding "fossil forget" as alias >> to "fossil rm" If not, I'll be glad to add it, awaiting >> further discussion. > >No objec

Re: [fossil-users] Justification for two-step mv and rm

2015-03-10 Thread Jan Nijtmans
2015-03-09 23:06 GMT+01:00 Tontyna : > Hurray and thank you! > > Will `addremove` become `addforget`? (Sorry, couldn't resist nitpicking.) It should be 'addforgetrename', with the added functionality that renames are detected too .... ;-)

Re: [fossil-users] How to fix parallel timeline

2015-03-12 Thread Jan Nijtmans
Fossil <1.30 had bugs which ill-treat repositories without any commits. Those were fixed in Fossil 1.30. A workaround: If you really want to create the initial repository with Fossil 1.30, use "fossil new --date-override now". Regards, Jan Nijtmans ___

Re: [fossil-users] How to fix parallel timeline

2015-03-13 Thread Jan Nijtmans
invisible to the students). Thanks to Tontyna for his excellent analysis, which made it (at least to me) fully clear what really happend here. Regards, Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] missing initial empty check-in & repository from import

2015-03-13 Thread Jan Nijtmans
le repository by design :-) Regards, Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] multiple independent check-outs against the same repository

2015-03-20 Thread Jan Nijtmans
ch isn't really there. The only problem I see in your workflow is that you were not warned that actually you were creating a fork, in 1.32 you will get that warning (after doing the same steps): $ fossil commit -m "commit b" would fork. "update" first or use --allow

Re: [fossil-users] Convenient command for standardizing and simplifying marking a commit as a mistake.

2015-03-20 Thread Jan Nijtmans
e.g. when multiple branches merge into the line which > this op would want to back something out of. Agreed. I don't think any simplification would be a good idea. Sorry! Regards, Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@

Re: [fossil-users] SVN-fs-dump-format-version: 3 will produce unusable blobs

2015-03-23 Thread Jan Nijtmans
and 2 from the svn dump-load-format, version 3 is not yet implemented. Regards, Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] TH1: Th_ToInt() issue

2015-04-01 Thread Jan Nijtmans
script and catch this. No, this is not expected. The n>0 check should have been n>1 here. In Tcl 8.6: $ tclsh8.6 % for {set i -} {$i<3} {set i [expr {$i+1}]} {puts $i\n}; - can't use non-numeric string as operand of "+" % Thanks! Jan Nijtman

Re: [fossil-users] fossil diff -tk on OS X

2015-04-03 Thread Jan Nijtmans
quite > cumbersome :) Sounds like this bug in Tk, which is recently solved on trunk: <http://core.tcl.tk/tk/info/0a4571b76a3e66c8> In Tk 8.5.18/8.6.5 this should be fixed. Regards, Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-us

Re: [fossil-users] fossil diff -tk on OS X

2015-04-03 Thread Jan Nijtmans
out Tcl support, "fossil diff --tk" still works, it just invokes "tclsh" to do the real work: $ tclsh % info patchlevel 8.6.4 % (Current Tcl/Tk trunk is not renumbered to 8.6.5 yet, that normally is done just before a new release) Regard

Re: [fossil-users] fossil diff -tk on OS X

2015-04-04 Thread Jan Nijtmans
ut will do the right things at run-time. Yes, this should be documented better.. Regards, Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] Two trunks?

2015-04-13 Thread Jan Nijtmans
function primary_parent_pid_from_rid() is not used anywhere. I went ahead, so the fork detection for fossil update/status/info (I din't hear anyone against that) will receive some more wide-spread testing. I'll do more testing on the "sync-forkwarn". Any more feedback welco

Re: [fossil-users] Two trunks?

2015-04-14 Thread Jan Nijtmans
all where the fork is. Most people won't have any idea why the warning was there, and what to do about it. I guess it will only cause more confusion than that it helps people getting the repository fork-free. Maybe more valuable would be to adapt t

Re: [fossil-users] Two trunks?

2015-04-16 Thread Jan Nijtmans
2015-04-14 21:11 GMT+02:00 Andy Bradford: > Thus said Jan Nijtmans on Tue, 14 Apr 2015 16:36:18 +0200: >> Maybe more valuable would be to adapt the /leaves page, so people >> searching forks have an easy way to do so. > > I proposed this very thing a few days ago, an

Re: [fossil-users] Two trunks?

2015-04-16 Thread Jan Nijtmans
tags: mistake) (4) 2014-05-28 09:56:34 [7d445e593a9966] Moved to "mistake" because this commit contains a typo causing a test to fail. Was: Add an extra test to further verify that the FTS notindexed option is working properly. (user: dan tag

Re: [fossil-users] Two trunks?

2015-04-17 Thread Jan Nijtmans
h the UI) So, a merge which merges the two tips of a fork together indeed closes the fork. But for other merges more needs to be done, that's how it functions (as it should). Sorry ;-) Regards, Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] How about renaming a fork to "fork-*"? (Was: Two trunks?)

2015-04-19 Thread Jan Nijtmans
: Maybe the artifacts in a round-trip create a fork, but this fork is resolved in some future round-trip which is still part of the same sync operation. It seems it's not wise at this moment to merge "sync-forkwarn" to trunk since false warnings here may be more co

Re: [fossil-users] auto-adjust of CLI timeline to terminal width?

2015-04-21 Thread Jan Nijtmans
regression. If > there is in fact a platform where you cannot include sys/ioctl.h if > TIOCGWINSZ isn’t defined by termios.h, a different ifdef will be required. It's very unlikely that a system having would not have . I don't know a

Re: [fossil-users] Bug? FOSSIL MV does not work as expected (Win7 machine)

2015-04-21 Thread Jan Nijtmans
uent discussion. Work already has been done by Joe Mistachkin to resolve this (Thanks Joe!) Just configure fossil using --with-legacy-mv-rm and then build it, then: ./fossil set mv-rm-files -global 1 I'm currently using fossil compiled this way, and so far it appears to work

Re: [fossil-users] How about renaming a fork to "fork-*"? (Was: Two trunks?)

2015-04-23 Thread Jan Nijtmans
it isn't. Of course, I could explicitly add a "close" tag here as workaround, but for the sake of bug reproducibility I'll leave it like this ;-) Thanks! Good catch! Pleading guilty! However, as you correctly stated, this is unrelated to the recent fork handling improvements,

Re: [fossil-users] Two trunks?

2015-04-25 Thread Jan Nijtmans
r on average in Fossil. We have had only 1 so far this year. So, let's start testing: <https://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/560483f50436c9f7> Keep good comments coming .! Thanks! Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-users mailing list

Re: [fossil-users] Testing. Was: Two trunks?

2015-04-26 Thread Jan Nijtmans
2015-04-25 22:54 GMT+02:00 Richard Hipp : > On 4/25/15, Jan Nijtmans wrote: >> 2015-04-25 18:38 GMT+02:00 Andy Bradford: >> So, let's start testing: >> <https://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/560483f50436c9f7> > > The "fossil forks" comm

Re: [fossil-users] Testing. Was: Two trunks?

2015-04-26 Thread Jan Nijtmans
th "fossil info" and use the more general term "ambigeous branch" (of which "fork" is a special case) <https://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/4359bd8df2119799> Regards, Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] Two trunks?

2015-04-27 Thread Jan Nijtmans
a5c9994222f> Regards, Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

[fossil-users] fossil clean --verily too strong???

2015-04-29 Thread Jan Nijtmans
--keep/"keep-glob" I am aware of, at least, that's how I am using it. - How about "fossil clean --verily --keep Makefile"? Despite the -keep option, the Makefile will still be removed. Regarding the other strengthening options, I agree! Thanks! Jan Nijtmans

Re: [fossil-users] fossil clean --verily too strong???

2015-04-29 Thread Jan Nijtmans
he same: The versioned setting content for those is even the same. Thanks! Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] fossil clean --verily too strong???

2015-04-29 Thread Jan Nijtmans
ose settings are convenient in MY build environment, but they should not have beeen imposed on others with different environments. I didn't realize that at the time. Regards, Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.or

[fossil-users] Version 1.33 win64

2015-05-25 Thread Jan Nijtmans
means, you probably don't need it but it won't hurt either) Regards, Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] SQLITE_ERROR using "fossil mv --hard"

2015-05-26 Thread Jan Nijtmans
SQLITE_ERROR: no such table: fmove Thank you for your report. Should be fixed here: <https://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/89212c5a69576f77> Regards, Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.33 - /reports failing

2015-06-02 Thread Jan Nijtmans
ons. There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. I'll see if I can trace this somewhat further, but gdb's "bt" shows nothing :-( Regards, Jan Nijtmans $ gdb ./fossil

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.33 - /reports failing

2015-06-02 Thread Jan Nijtmans
2015-06-02 9:22 GMT+02:00 Jan Nijtmans : > I'm seeing the same problem in /reports. See below. However, > if I remove the -O2 compiler flag from the Makefile, everything > works fine. So, this could be a gcc optimization bug. It turns out not to be a gcc optimization bug

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.33

2015-06-02 Thread Jan Nijtmans
d803f9ad6> Regards, Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] relative vs full path for external diff command

2015-06-03 Thread Jan Nijtmans
.org/index.html/info/3ffb6a3e6299e92f> (at least for this specific case, I'm sure there are more ...) Regards, Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] relative vs full path for external diff command

2015-06-04 Thread Jan Nijtmans
2015-06-03 17:42 GMT+02:00 Ron W : > On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 10:24 AM, Jan Nijtmans > wrote: >> >> 2015-04-25 1:29 GMT+02:00 Ron W : >> > Would it be reasonable for Fossil to have a setting, or option in the >> > diff/gdiff command setting, to indicate that re

Re: [fossil-users] relative vs full path for external diff command

2015-06-05 Thread Jan Nijtmans
if the current directory is c:\Users\foo (win32), /cygdrive/c/Users/foo (cygwin) or /c/Users/foo (msys). See: <http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/c9f3266836f1f7fe> Thanks! Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@l

Re: [fossil-users] "mv --hard" bug!

2015-06-08 Thread Jan Nijtmans
.2.8 > SSL (OpenSSL 1.0.2a 19 Mar 2015) > UNICODE_COMMAND_LINE This problem was fixed the very next day, 2015-05-29 17:14:59: <http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/c56a387d47e5efde> Regards, Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-users mailin

Re: [fossil-users] please compile official fossil builds with https support

2015-06-12 Thread Jan Nijtmans
ourse, Fedora and Ubuntu have the option to provide their own fossil binary, which links with both libz and libssl dynamically. But such a build will be Fedora/Ubuntu-specific, and is not guaranteed to work on any other Linux distribution. I don't expect sqlite.org to provide downloads for each

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.33 win64

2015-06-12 Thread Jan Nijtmans
2015-05-25 11:34 GMT+02:00 Jan Nijtmans: > For anyone interested, I built fossil 1.33 especially > for win64, it's available here: > > <https://sourceforge.net/projects/cyqlite/files/fossil/> > > This binary is compiled with latest MinGW-w64 compiler, > and wit

Re: [fossil-users] Issue with cloning a repo

2015-06-17 Thread Jan Nijtmans
Or "file fossil"? Is the fossil binary self-compiled or obtained elsewhere? Is it a 32-bit or 64-bit binary, is it statically linked or not? Answers to those questions might give a hint on what's happening here. Regards, Jan Nijtmans __

Re: [fossil-users] Issue with cloning a repo

2015-06-17 Thread Jan Nijtmans
sil: <https://registry.hub.docker.com/u/nijtmans/fossil/> Regards, Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] fossil undo for fossil clean

2015-06-26 Thread Jan Nijtmans
lity to recover. 2) files > 10M (is this a good value?), those will be prompted for, before removing them forever. I never really needed that, therefore I didn't do enough with it to thrust it for 100%. But if it's usefull to you, I'm happ

Re: [fossil-users] fossil undo for fossil clean

2015-06-26 Thread Jan Nijtmans
ome thoughts in writing. Will revisit > when I have time. Thanks for your idea, and having a look at the branch. It's certainly not ready yet, but your input can get the branch closer to being finalized. Regards, Jan Nijtmans ___ f

Re: [fossil-users] fossil serve repolist error

2015-06-29 Thread Jan Nijtmans
is part of the fossil code, just wanted to let you know that I'm reading this with interest. As soon as this problem is fixed, I would like to cherry-pick the fix, and update the nijtmans/fossil docker image. Regards, Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] Adding 'undo' support to the 'clean' command...

2015-07-10 Thread Jan Nijtmans
t;abc.x" (a=all/y/N)? y Yes, that's exactly how I expect it to work. Thanks! Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] Adding 'undo' support to the 'clean' command...

2015-07-14 Thread Jan Nijtmans
2015-07-10 12:04 GMT+02:00 Jan Nijtmans : > $ ./fossil clean > WARNING: Deletion of this file will not be undoable via the 'undo' > command because the file is too big. > Remove unmanaged file "abc.x" (a=all/y/N)? y > > Yes,

Re: [fossil-users] SVN-fs-dump-format-version: 3 will produce unusable blobs

2015-08-27 Thread Jan Nijtmans
the problem is located and corrected. Regards, Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] Trying to compile fossil with TCL integration

2015-09-02 Thread Jan Nijtmans
thing should be OK. Then, enable it: fossil set tcl 1 After that, it should work, but not in the test-th-eval command ;-) You could try "fossil ui" and then go to Admin -> TH1. Typing the command "tclEval {info tclversion}" from there w

Re: [fossil-users] Trying to compile fossil with TCL integration

2015-09-03 Thread Jan Nijtmans
l? You should configure with "--with-tcl --with-tcl-stubs --with-tcl-private-stubs". This way (which should be the default IMHO) fossil will use its own Tcl header for compilation (derived from Tcl 8.6.0), and check the actual Tcl version at runtime which. This should still work with Tcl 8

Re: [fossil-users] Time to release Fossil version 1.34?

2015-10-20 Thread Jan Nijtmans
4e to fossil. It turns out that the cause of this problem is the following commit: <http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/9431fec1ea098fea> so I backed it out. My local trunk build doesn't show the problem any more. Regards, Jan Nijtmans

Re: [fossil-users] Time to release Fossil version 1.34?

2015-10-21 Thread Jan Nijtmans
2015-10-20 19:51 GMT+02:00 Joe Mistachkin : > Jan Nijtmans wrote: >> >> It turns out that the cause of this problem is the following commit: >> <http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/9431fec1ea098fea> >> so I backed it out. My local trunk build doe

Re: [fossil-users] Can't build Fossil 1.34 with Tcl 8.5

2015-11-02 Thread Jan Nijtmans
1-hooks --json --with-zlib Just add the options --with-tcl-stubs and --with-tcl-private-stubs, then it will work fine. (Don't ask me why this isn't the default when using --with-tcl, I think it should be) Regards, Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-us

Re: [fossil-users] source code file is considered by fossil to be binary.

2015-11-05 Thread Jan Nijtmans
i characters. As far as I know, fossil doesn't use control characters to decide the file is binary, only the null-byte. So I think something else is triggering the binary detection. Too long lines, maybe? Regards, Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-us

Re: [fossil-users] source code file is considered by fossil to be binary.

2015-11-06 Thread Jan Nijtmans
en the function looks_like_binary() didn't exist yet. Should be fixed now: <https://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/info/b51ba29365b93b3f> Whatever definition of BINARY is chosen, I think it should be the same everywhere within fossil. Thanks! Jan Nijtmans __

Re: [fossil-users] Windows/MinGW build

2016-01-13 Thread Jan Nijtmans
e MinGW-w64, then you can use all unicode characters in the command line you like. See: <http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/tktview/edab7bb5c973f41fced6> Regards, Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org h

Re: [fossil-users] Windows/MinGW build

2016-01-14 Thread Jan Nijtmans
2016-01-13 18:08 GMT+01:00 LM: > Jan Nijtmans wrote: >> However, I would recommend to use MinGW-w64, then you >> can use all unicode characters in the command line you like > > A lot of die-hard original MinGW users including myself refuse to use > MinGW-w64 due to lice

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil build improvements...

2016-02-07 Thread Jan Nijtmans
s in > filenames), but maybe I'm missing something. BROKEN_MINGW_CMDLINE is meant for the original mingw only, for mingw-w64 everything's fine. For details, see: <http://sourceforge.net/p/mingw/bugs/771/> Regards, Jan Nijtmans ___

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil build improvements...

2016-02-08 Thread Jan Nijtmans
only way I know which enables the use of _all_ unicode characters on the command line, not only the ones in the current windows code-page. Regards, Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil 2.0: rethinking extras, addremove, and clean

2016-05-22 Thread Jan Nijtmans
an-glob setting and related functionality altogether. It was a mistake. For the reasons why, see: <https://www.mail-archive.com/fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org/msg11685.html> Regards, Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.

Re: [fossil-users] keep-glob

2016-05-22 Thread Jan Nijtmans
uld clean itself while running. It could also be used to protect specific files which don't influence the build (such as long log files) from being cleaned, those files will then typically be in ignore-glob too. Not used very often, but still I prefer to keep it. Rega

Re: [fossil-users] keep-glob

2016-05-23 Thread Jan Nijtmans
s your suggestion? Handle keep-glob in extras and addremove just as in clean? I would support that, it doesn't have to wait for fossil 2.0 if you would ask me. It would mean that I can simplify my ignore-glob setting a bit, indeed a bit more logical. Regards, Jan Nijtmans ___

Re: [fossil-users] keep-glob

2016-05-24 Thread Jan Nijtmans
;t do? The difference can only be seen in verbose mode (-v). Any file matching keep-glob will result in a warning: KEPT file not removed (due to --keep or "keep-glob") Agreed it's a very thin use-case, thinking about it now ;-) Regards, Jan Nijtmans ___

Re: [fossil-users] how to report bug in fossil

2016-06-10 Thread Jan Nijtmans
2016-06-10 2:01 GMT+02:00 Scott Robison: > I just committed > a one line fix (with multiple lines of comments to clarify what the code is > doing in the tricky part). Scott, I owe you. Many thanks! You are completely right, this was an edge-case not covered for. Regards, Jan

Re: [fossil-users] how to report bug in fossil

2016-06-10 Thread Jan Nijtmans
2016-06-10 9:24 GMT+02:00 Scott Robison: > On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 1:15 AM, Jan Nijtmans > wrote: >> >> 2016-06-10 2:01 GMT+02:00 Scott Robison: >> > I just committed >> > a one line fix (with multiple lines of comments to clarify what the code >> > i

Re: [fossil-users] how to report bug in fossil

2016-06-10 Thread Jan Nijtmans
est-failures but all failures turned out to be errors in the expected test-outcome. I fixed those test-cases now, added more of them, and fixed the invalid_utf8() function in trunk. Now all tests pass with both trunk code and your code. Many thanks, Scott ! Once more, fossil got bet

Re: [fossil-users] [TCLCORE] FYI - tcl core - unintended fork

2016-07-05 Thread Jan Nijtmans
troduced with this commit: <http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/f73411025e8ebec70029> investigating .. This appears to fix the bug, probably not the right fix . but it works. <http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/a78e51185326b91f> Rega

Re: [fossil-users] [TCLCORE] FYI - tcl core - unintended fork

2016-07-05 Thread Jan Nijtmans
2016-07-05 16:18 GMT+02:00 Jan Nijtmans: > But there is currently a bug in fossil which shows > a closed fork with an additional arrow going up. Now I don't > have an example any more showing this ;-( Never mind ... found it: <https://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/info

<    1   2   3   4   5