o element -- it resembles the current image
element of ![](), but is different enough that one will not be confused
for the other.
(But perhaps that breaks something else in the markdown-syntax-rules. Who
knows?)
Good luck with it.
If no-one cares to write the code, then it cannot be integrat
part.
> i rather expected 'makefile' to work just like a normal glob and match any
> matching filename.
It works like a normal fossil glob; not like a Unix file glob.
Cheers,
f
--
Francis Dalyfran...@daoine.org
___
fossil-users mai
On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 10:44:34AM +0100, Zombies wrote:
> On 10 September 2016 at 01:52, Francis Daly <fran...@daoine.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 08:27:53AM +0100, Zombies wrote:
Hi there,
Good that you got it working.
> > > ./fossil server --baseurl "https
chy. It is not good if you are just hiding behind https.
If the front-end is just a load balancer (with ssl termination), and
includes the "fossil.mydomain.com" Host: header in the requests that
get to fossil, then possibly
HTTPS=on ./fossil server repos/myRepo
will cause it to Just Work for you.
to expand on them.
When the code is ready, it'll be time for the One Person to use the One
Vote, and we'll see what's in the next version of fossil ;-)
f
--
Francis Dalyfran...@daoine.org
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil
-fossil.
Cheers,
f
--
Francis Dalyfran...@daoine.org
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 05:52:36PM -0700, Warren Young wrote:
On Mar 4, 2015, at 5:28 PM, Francis Daly fran...@daoine.org wrote:
On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 03:49:37PM -0700, Warren Young wrote:
I think that the principle of least surprise for non-users of fossil is
(much) less important.
I
that fossil-cgi uses to know
it's really https, the web server could be configured to send that.
f
--
Francis Dalyfran...@daoine.org
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 10:50:24PM +0100, Gour wrote:
Francis Daly fran...@daoine.org writes:
Hi there,
So presumably all that is needed is to use the fossil-cgi equivalent
to fossil-http's --https argument.
My site is set to use https-only, so to me it seems it's still the
original
. (But that usually isn't done.)
The no-code-change answer is just to document that fossil requires that +
be encoded as %2b everywhere in a URL, but that's probably not a great
long-term option.
f
--
Francis Dalyfran...@daoine.org
___
fossil-users
.
Either works; what is there currently is not incorrect.
f
--
Francis Dalyfran...@daoine.org
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
--
Francis Dalyfran...@daoine.org
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
. It sets SCRIPT_NAME,
but not REQUEST_URI.
f
--
Francis Dalyfran...@daoine.org
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
/help?cmd=http,
is the documentation, although it may not be clear enough if you don't
already know the answer.
Cheers,
f
--
Francis Dalyfran...@daoine.org
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil
be all
you need to get over the first hurdle.
There may well be a second hurdle after that, of course ;-)
Cheers,
f
--
Francis Dalyfran...@daoine.org
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil
page is the
editable-to-some list of the repos to make easily visible.
fossil server --notfound /index /var/fossil
Manual updates needed; anything not listed is still accessible if the name
is known; but it is a cheap way of making a friendly list available.
Too naive?
f
--
Francis Daly
, is there some way I can recover the Y for b and c?
Thanks,
f
--
Francis Dalyfran...@daoine.org
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 07:58:03PM +, Francis Daly wrote:
Hi there,
I forgot at least one case, which I can shoe-horn in here by adding:
what would be different if rm a were added just before fossil
new-rm a, as in:
echo X a; echo X b; echo X c;
fossil add a b
fossil commit -m a and b
18 matches
Mail list logo
