Re: [fossil-users] CHANGED versus EDITED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 7/16/2014 11:33 PM, Andy Goth wrote: On 7/14/2014 9:54 PM, Andy Goth wrote: When a file has been modified, [fossil diff -brief] reports it as CHANGED, whereas [fossil status] reports it as EDITED. Is this inconsistent terminology intentional? What other inconsistencies are possible between these two commands? I would have thought they'd share the same reporting code. I see [fossil changes] also says EDITED. Looks like [fossil diff -brief] is the odd man out. Furthermore, I see [fossil changes] and [fossil status] respect the relative paths setting, as discussed in a previous email Inconsistent paths replied to by Jan Nijtmans. However, [fossil diff] and [fossil diff -brief] do not honor relative paths. Once again, [fossil diff] is the odd man out, and I remain surprised it doesn't share the reporting code with the other two commands I mention. - -- Andy Goth | andrew.m.goth/at/gmail/dot/com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTyEAXAAoJELtYwrrr47Y4UfIIAJqSOs8sNiIzudRITcHH8Td/ kLWBtUePwwCl87pI6kxV9gt6lL68gqvH53JiBlxvCd62HpEPnumxeEPTEwTXjjZF dLB7KjrgNFVq4k4JtsUcz1H2EV1Zs2Q4l1/f9U21HB5kcE6DgfBmAe3mlC/ZmyOl 3JnAwf6Dh9ljIHN/LszGWTTk90YgKCJgj2A0gPASYxtxKjuBXcleULvNqgfBLIoU II9yVTRxDavyQX7VV+Ii/Ebh8o/oR9F7WkURK7Cg/FEB1HG2noduFa5PGNKGBE/e DJJ1WcfGhOcXx5Zm1iqYg+HwbMQvEvxBzAY1dO4isqR3C8Fngr9QozQUywIau4E= =RP5D -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] CHANGED versus EDITED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 7/14/2014 9:54 PM, Andy Goth wrote: When a file has been modified, [fossil diff -brief] reports it as CHANGED, whereas [fossil status] reports it as EDITED. Is this inconsistent terminology intentional? What other inconsistencies are possible between these two commands? I would have thought they'd share the same reporting code. I see [fossil changes] also says EDITED. Looks like [fossil diff - -brief] is the odd man out. - -- Andy Goth | andrew.m.goth/at/gmail/dot/com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTx1IEAAoJELtYwrrr47Y4ts8H/iuuoG1nHJDGqz9nPByTc1vB F9OHYjh37fZjqX+GEJYsQyPahds4Wbd3nVg3crizSZIHlrKROrqo0fWKYP5HzlKy LefgTsW7fB0AibTXxc5+oEh8s0LI7jsF9x5gpshSXqTs2b6FNmbVYZ+bDJmGTIt6 W/qLwn3xVxBtphV52FxeUqZl2csJj/3Y2UOJtGXuHGqBT/jZE526HvbBREgZl51j kfjKSoorfkiE82qF8QDdXnKhVCzRK+QYgT1AscGaKGfjLk8IBuE39v79CReUVegH jZ+hxLYJpjx4YXneWGC90o1r4blX4WlijA5ko5YudELPVqj8VvwlDaMYXgv5JBo= =foqR -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
[fossil-users] CHANGED versus EDITED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 When a file has been modified, [fossil diff -brief] reports it as CHANGED, whereas [fossil status] reports it as EDITED. Is this inconsistent terminology intentional? What other inconsistencies are possible between these two commands? I would have thought they'd share the same reporting code. - -- Andy Goth | andrew.m.goth/at/gmail/dot/com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTxJf3AAoJELtYwrrr47Y4ZEEH/3liMbB50goRpnrVTHsRbGc1 oYTHsqDz+n9Ipd9a7yloLvKk4dljkFFeZ38EjgMOCC6MXLFQUjsgLQi7A0CYjuuP Fzd0NB0a/LrK2CHyLlGEvUozL5IRH4h/gGkNqNPG2/ZETPLsDEhHnl5HA9xnhGSq 2AUmeSvIZKYQ1rk/lAbUCP7QGWfTSQIY34+sJvFo8eqsxPhnGWgAQESmT7iti/Cn qQyGSVe0dxn+Q5Q729RqbhkPyciPQo6+ZZiyIrxsDCD5Y12tdqe9w+/VqIGWcFlI hUYaIfkQ+U6sK6A71hieL+5uMLSP5jV3ZaFEH/Z8zmrTiC0fbGjeTKBSzsnzSBE= =nNVq -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
