Re: [fossil-users] fossil 1.25 Windows XP - open command 'fails'

Am 05.04.2013 11:17, schrieb Jan Nijtmans: See: My guess, seeing this very long file name of 182 characters, it's the total path length which is the problem. Does the total path exceed 260 characters? That would explain everything. It seems

Re: [fossil-users] fossil 1.25 Windows XP - open command 'fails'

On Fri, 05 Apr 2013 10:57:42 +0200 Jan wrote: > Am 05.04.2013 09:41, schrieb Jan Nijtmans: > > What's the (error-)message immediately before the "Rolling back..." line? > > That > > should give a clue about what's really going on here. > > It says > > fossil: unable to open file "file.pdf" for

Re: [fossil-users] fossil 1.25 Windows XP - open command 'fails'

2013/4/5 Jan > > This is the file name: > > Delagarde 2010 GrazeIn a model of herbage intake and milk production for > grazing dairy cows. 2. Prediction of intake under rotational and > continuously stocked grazing management.pdf > > Something wrong with that on XP? Seems to work on Win7 though.

Re: [fossil-users] fossil 1.25 Windows XP - open command 'fails'

Am 05.04.2013 09:41, schrieb Jan Nijtmans: What's the (error-)message immediately before the "Rolling back..." line? That should give a clue about what's really going on here. It says fossil: unable to open file "file.pdf" for writing Rolling back ... This is the file name: Delagarde 2010

Re: [fossil-users] fossil 1.25 Windows XP - open command 'fails'

2013/4/5 Jan > Am 04.04.2013 22:46, schrieb Matt Welland: > > After you run fossil open, maybe you just need to checkout the correct >>> branch. Try fossil up trunk. >>> >> > I seems on XP fossil is checking out the initial check in and not the > trunk. I have also tried fossil update trunk but

Re: [fossil-users] fossil 1.25 Windows XP - open command 'fails'

Am 04.04.2013 22:46, schrieb Matt Welland: After you run fossil open, maybe you just need to checkout the correct branch. Try fossil up trunk. I seems on XP fossil is checking out the initial check in and not the trunk. I have also tried fossil update trunk but that gives me really strange ou

Re: [fossil-users] fossil 1.25 Windows XP - open command 'fails'

I'm pretty sure I've seen this behaviour on Linux a few times. The initial checkout pointed to some old node in the timeline Running fossil checkout trunk seemed to fix it. On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 12:50 PM, James Turner wrote: > On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 09:40:19PM +0200, Jan wrote: > > Sorry, I f

Re: [fossil-users] fossil 1.25 Windows XP - open command 'fails'

On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 09:40:19PM +0200, Jan wrote: > Sorry, I forgot to mention that the repo size is ok and fossil ui > tells me that all the content is there - in theory. But not in the > check out. > > fossil test-integrity -R test.fossil > 1677 non-phantom blobs (out of 1677 total) checked:

Re: [fossil-users] fossil 1.25 Windows XP - open command 'fails'

Sorry, I forgot to mention that the repo size is ok and fossil ui tells me that all the content is there - in theory. But not in the check out. fossil test-integrity -R test.fossil 1677 non-phantom blobs (out of 1677 total) checked: 0 errors I also ran fossil rebuild test.fossil Probably it i

Re: [fossil-users] fossil 1.25 Windows XP - open command 'fails'

On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 9:12 PM, Stephan Beal wrote: > Wasn't there a thread on the sqlite list a few months back about XP > support being removed (or allowed to die off)? Maybe i'm remembering > incorrectly. > Nevermind - think it was Win95 or 98, not XP. -- - stephan beal http://wandering

Re: [fossil-users] fossil 1.25 Windows XP - open command 'fails'

On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 9:05 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > Hard to say. Maybe it is something wrong with your XP box? Nobody else > has reported anything like this using Fossil on windows. I've been using > Fossil on windows7 all day today without issues. > Wasn't there a thread on the sqlite list

Re: [fossil-users] fossil 1.25 Windows XP - open command 'fails'

On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Jan wrote: > If have fossil running on a server and updated the version to 1.25 and did > fossil rebuild. > Then I built fossil.exe from sources (mingw with --enable-json) and cloned > the server repository locally. But when I run 'fossil open' I get only one > out

[fossil-users] fossil 1.25 Windows XP - open command 'fails'

If have fossil running on a server and updated the version to 1.25 and did fossil rebuild. Then I built fossil.exe from sources (mingw with --enable-json) and cloned the server repository locally. But when I run 'fossil open' I get only one out of three source directories (lots of files missing

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil 1.25

On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 8:33 PM, Ruediger Haertel wrote: > Correct. But I would comment the FOSSIL_ENABLE_JSON just like it was done > for > the mingw part. So to enable it you remove the comment. > Sounds like a plan. i'm stuck at work until late tonight doing a software deployment in China, bu

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil 1.25

Am Mittwoch, 23. Januar 2013, 10:54:12 schrieb Stephan Beal: > On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 10:15 AM, Stephan Beal wrote: > > i'll try to get this snuck in during work today, but we've got a half-day > > team meeting, so it might have to wait until tomorrow. In any case, i've > > set a reminder event so

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil 1.25

On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 10:15 AM, Stephan Beal wrote: > i'll try to get this snuck in during work today, but we've got a half-day > team meeting, so it might have to wait until tomorrow. In any case, i've > set a reminder event so i won't forget it. > Hi, Rudi, a small problem: +FOSSIL_ENABLE_J

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil 1.25

On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 6:04 AM, Ruediger Haertel wrote: > here you are. Thanks for your efforts. > Guten morgen! i'll try to get this snuck in during work today, but we've got a half-day team meeting, so it might have to wait until tomorrow. In any case, i've set a reminder event so i won't fo

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil 1.25

Am Dienstag, 22. Januar 2013, 10:35:38 schrieb Stephan Beal: > On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 11:12 PM, Ruediger Haertel wrote: > > I did that already and sent a patch to Richard that updated the > > makemake.tcl > > file. Until now it is not in repository. I am still waiting ... > > Hi Ruediger, > > c

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil 1.25

On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 11:12 PM, Ruediger Haertel wrote: > I did that already and sent a patch to Richard that updated the > makemake.tcl > file. Until now it is not in repository. I am still waiting ... Hi Ruediger, can you please re-send the patch, and i'll get it integrated. -- - ste

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil 1.25

Am Freitag, 18. Januar 2013, 14:07:24 schrieb Ross Berteig: > On 1/18/2013 10:51 AM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 1:32 PM, > > > > wrote: > > Well, it looks like a Win32 binary for v1.25 is DIY. :( > > Really want to try the new fossil diff fe

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil 1.25

Done. Can't believe I didn't see that :( Fossil v$release_version$manifest_version $manifest_date Thanks for fossil! On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 12:11 PM, wrote: >> >> Another question about compiling fossil from src? >> VERSION.h contents

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil 1.25

On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 12:11 PM, wrote: > Another question about compiling fossil from src? > VERSION.h contents: > #define MANIFEST_UUID "80bf94e0f7ea9eb64ad9c35ed61863d73160767e" > #define MANIFEST_VERSION "[80bf94e0f7]" > #define MANIFEST_DATE "2013-01-18 21:34:21" > #define MANIFEST_YEAR "20

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil 1.25

On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 6:11 PM, wrote: > But fossil ui shows manifest version: > "This page was generated in about 0.016s by Fossil version > [80bf94e0f7] 2013-01-18 21:34:21" > > How can I trick the simpler "1.25" to appear? > Untested, but i _think_ you need to go into the footer config and r

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil 1.25

Another question about compiling fossil from src? VERSION.h contents: #define MANIFEST_UUID "80bf94e0f7ea9eb64ad9c35ed61863d73160767e" #define MANIFEST_VERSION "[80bf94e0f7]" #define MANIFEST_DATE "2013-01-18 21:34:21" #define MANIFEST_YEAR "2013" #define RELEASE_VERSION "1.25" #define RELEASE_VERS

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil 1.25

On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 2:09 PM, wrote: >> >> Whoa! I am psyched if it's really that easy! >> >> >> 2. Trying MinGW got the furthest... >> - >> c:\_Soft\fossil\src>C:\MinGW\msys\1.0\bin\make -f win/Makefile.mingw >

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil 1.25

On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 11:07 PM, Ross Berteig wrote: > Both MinGW and MSVC have worked for me in the past. For my last build (ca. > v1.24), I wanted to turn JSON support on, and that required a bunch of fuss > and bother to get working, IIRC. > i've got some built notes from Tim Ryan here to tr

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil 1.25

Le 2013-01-18 à 14:09, sky5w...@gmail.com a écrit : [Snip] > 2. Trying MinGW got the furthest... > - > c:\_Soft\fossil\src>C:\MinGW\msys\1.0\bin\make -f win/Makefile.mingw > -- > ~...make headers... >wbld/VERSION.h > Input file "wb

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil 1.25

On 1/18/2013 10:51 AM, Richard Hipp wrote: On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 1:32 PM, mailto:sky5w...@gmail.com>> wrote: Well, it looks like a Win32 binary for v1.25 is DIY. :( Really want to try the new fossil diff features... > You need: (1) Fossil sources (2) Either MingGW+Msys or MSVC Bot

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil 1.25

On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 12:47:59AM +0400, Konstantin Khomoutov wrote: > > > 1. Visual Studio is not in my PATH, but the following cmd seems to > > > have tried and failed? > > > >Don't start a normal cmd.exe; start the "Start Visual Studio Command > > Line" (don't remember the exact title, bu

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil 1.25

On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 08:27:17PM +0100, Jan Danielsson wrote: > > 1. Visual Studio is not in my PATH, but the following cmd seems to > > have tried and failed? > >Don't start a normal cmd.exe; start the "Start Visual Studio Command > Line" (don't remember the exact title, but you'll find it

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil 1.25

Done! :) Had to download VS10 Express. Then as Jan said, run: Visual Studio Command Prompt (2010) Then run per fossil doc's and Dr Hipp C:\_Soft\fossil\src\win>nmake /f Makefile.msc No changes required. Thanks for fossil. On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 2:27 PM, Jan Danielsson wrote: > On 01/18/13 20:0

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil 1.25

On 01/18/13 20:09, sky5w...@gmail.com wrote: > 1. Visual Studio is not in my PATH, but the following cmd seems to > have tried and failed? Don't start a normal cmd.exe; start the "Start Visual Studio Command Line" (don't remember the exact title, but you'll find it easily if you look for it), w

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil 1.25

On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 2:09 PM, wrote: > Whoa! I am psyched if it's really that easy! > > > 2. Trying MinGW got the furthest... > - > c:\_Soft\fossil\src>C:\MinGW\msys\1.0\bin\make -f win/Makefile.mingw > -- > ~...make headers... >

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil 1.25

Whoa! I am psyched if it's really that easy! 1. Visual Studio is not in my PATH, but the following cmd seems to have tried and failed? - c:\_Soft\fossil\src\win>"C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio 10.0\VC\bin\nmake" /f Makefile.msc - Microsoft

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil 1.25

On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 1:32 PM, wrote: > Well, it looks like a Win32 binary for v1.25 is DIY. :( > Really want to try the new fossil diff features... > > I am slightly C literate but don't use that environment day to day. > I downloaded latest fossil src and zlib and MinGW and Pelles C and no >

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil 1.25

On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 1:32 PM, wrote: > Well, it looks like a Win32 binary for v1.25 is DIY. :( > Really want to try the new fossil diff features... > > I am slightly C literate but don't use that environment day to day. > I downloaded latest fossil src and zlib and MinGW and Pelles C and no >

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil 1.25

Well, it looks like a Win32 binary for v1.25 is DIY. :( Really want to try the new fossil diff features... I am slightly C literate but don't use that environment day to day. I downloaded latest fossil src and zlib and MinGW and Pelles C and no luck trying their make files. Is there an explicit t

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil 1.25

Hi, I know it's been asked before, but will v1.25 be available soon for download? Thanks for fossil. On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 8:40 AM, Maxim Khitrov wrote: > On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 4:12 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: >> >> >> On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Ruediger Haertel wrote: >>> >>> Hello, >>> >

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil 1.25

On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 4:12 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Ruediger Haertel wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> happy new year to all of you. Will there be precompiled versions of v1.25? >> I >> remember there was a discussion about this, but don't know what the result >> was

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil 1.25

On Wed, 9 Jan 2013 10:32:02 -0500 sky5w...@gmail.com wrote: > Is v1.25 baked yet? > Would really appreciate the latest binary for Windows. :) http://www.mail-archive.com/fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org/msg10645.html ___ fossil-users mailing list fossi

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil 1.25

Am Mittwoch, 2. Januar 2013, 16:12:49 schrieb Richard Hipp: > On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Ruediger Haertel wrote: > > Hello, > > > > happy new year to all of you. Will there be precompiled versions of v1.25? > > I > > remember there was a discussion about this, but don't know what the result

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil 1.25

On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Ruediger Haertel wrote: > Hello, > > happy new year to all of you. Will there be precompiled versions of v1.25? > I > remember there was a discussion about this, but don't know what the result > was. > > I really like to have a precompiled binary for windows. Not t

[fossil-users] Fossil 1.25

Hello, happy new year to all of you. Will there be precompiled versions of v1.25? I remember there was a discussion about this, but don't know what the result was. I really like to have a precompiled binary for windows. Not that I couldn't build one myself but it was really handy just to downl