Re: [fossil-users] Improvements to side-by-side diff

2012-12-19 Thread Paolo Bolzoni
I guess On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote: > On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 10:27:09AM +0100, Paolo Bolzoni wrote: >> Maybe joining both ideas? Like coloring the whole word of a more neutral >> color and the difference with the usual bright color? >> >> I think it would be t

Re: [fossil-users] Improvements to side-by-side diff

2012-12-18 Thread Marc Laporte
Hi! How about some links for previous and next commit? Thanks! M ;-) On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 9:16 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > Reposted from fossil-dev: > > OLD: http://www2.sqlite.org/src/ci/52e755943f?sbs=1#chunk1 > NEW: http://www.sqlite.org/src/ci/52e755943f?sbs=1#chunk1 > > OLD: > http:

Re: [fossil-users] Improvements to side-by-side diff

2012-12-18 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 10:27:09AM +0100, Paolo Bolzoni wrote: > Maybe joining both ideas? Like coloring the whole word of a more neutral > color and the difference with the usual bright color? > > I think it would be the best as I agree with both point of views. Fwiw, I'd prefer only the per-cha

Re: [fossil-users] Improvements to side-by-side diff

2012-12-17 Thread Martijn Coppoolse
On 17-12-2012 10:27, Paolo Bolzoni wrote: Maybe joining both ideas? Like coloring the whole word of a more neutral color and the difference with the usual bright color? I think it would be the best as I agree with both point of views. That would work for me. :-) -- Martijn Coppoolse _

Re: [fossil-users] Improvements to side-by-side diff

2012-12-17 Thread Paolo Bolzoni
Maybe joining both ideas? Like coloring the whole word of a more neutral color and the difference with the usual bright color? I think it would be the best as I agree with both point of views. On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 10:03 AM, Martijn Coppoolse wrote: > On 17-12-2012 8:33, Baruch Burstein wrote:

Re: [fossil-users] Improvements to side-by-side diff

2012-12-17 Thread Martijn Coppoolse
On 17-12-2012 8:33, Baruch Burstein wrote: Another suggestion: Since visual diffs are always for text files (I think), it doesn't make much sense to mark partial words as changed. If the whole word is not unchanged, then the whole word is changed. I am referring to things like line 73817 on the l

Re: [fossil-users] Improvements to side-by-side diff

2012-12-16 Thread Baruch Burstein
Another suggestion: Since visual diffs are always for text files (I think), it doesn't make much sense to mark partial words as changed. If the whole word is not unchanged, then the whole word is changed. I am referring to things like line 73817 on the left in the fourth link below. On Sat, Dec 15

Re: [fossil-users] Improvements to side-by-side diff

2012-12-15 Thread Richard Hipp
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 2:41 AM, Themba Fletcher wrote: > I've been meaning to post this for a while. On every browser except > firefox, at least with my installed fonts, the side-by-side diff container > overflows the body resulting in the body's border being visible as a > vertical gray line beh

Re: [fossil-users] Improvements to side-by-side diff

2012-12-14 Thread Themba Fletcher
I've been meaning to post this for a while. On every browser except firefox, at least with my installed fonts, the side-by-side diff container overflows the body resulting in the body's border being visible as a vertical gray line behind the diff content. This will fix that, if you'd like to have

[fossil-users] Improvements to side-by-side diff

2012-12-14 Thread Richard Hipp
Reposted from fossil-dev: OLD: http://www2.sqlite.org/src/ci/52e755943f?sbs=1#chunk1 NEW: http://www.sqlite.org/src/ci/52e755943f?sbs=1#chunk1 OLD: http://www2.fossil-scm.org/fossil/fdiff?v1=955cc67ace8fb622&v2=e2e1c87b86664b45#chunk24 NEW: http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/fdiff?v1=955cc67ace8fb