a la libiberty?
cc -o foo foo.c -liberty
On 7/31/13, Stephan Beal wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 10:32 PM, B Harder wrote:
>
>> I'm going to recycle a project name I've used before: urvogel (the first
>> bird), and suggest for its logo:
>> http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/diapsids/birds/archie2.
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 10:32 PM, B Harder wrote:
> I'm going to recycle a project name I've used before: urvogel (the first
> bird), and suggest for its logo:
> http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/diapsids/birds/archie2.jpg
>
Hmmm. That one just doesn't grab me. The more i think about Jeremy's idea
th
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 10:42 PM, Jeremy Anderson wrote:
> In that case, why not go with "libbingfossil" :)
>
If we shorten that to "libingfossil" we're really close to the "living
fossil" idea.
Not bad. i like it. But the Windows users might not get the joke:
ingfossil.dll doesn't have the sam
In that case, why not go with "libbingfossil" :)
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 6:10 AM, wrote:
> On 2013-07-30 06:06, Stephan Beal wrote:
>
>>
>> The obvious choices include:
>>
>> - libfossil - nothing wrong with that, IMO.
>>
>
> That seems to be the obvious choice. But if you want to get creative
I'm going to recycle a project name I've used before: urvogel (the first
bird), and suggest for its logo:
http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/diapsids/birds/archie2.jpg
On Jul 30, 2013 3:06 AM, "Stephan Beal" wrote:
> Hi, all,
>
> As most of you know, work has begun on a prototype of what i unfortunatel
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Stephan Beal wrote:
> - libfossil - nothing wrong with that, IMO.
>
That seems to be the most popular (and arguably the most natural) choice so
far, so that's the tentative name until/unless someone proposes something
mind-blowing.
Thanks for your input!
--
--
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 3:47 PM, Steve Landers wrote:
> Just be careful it doesn't become a coprolith.
>
Most certainly not ;). (This thread has been more educational than
anticipated.)
--
- stephan beal
http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/
http://gplus.to/sgbeal
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Stephan Beal wrote:
> Hi, all,
>
> As most of you know, work has begun on a prototype of what i unfortunately
> dubbed "fossil v2." As it turns out, everything i want to do can be done on
> top of current repos, with no repo-level incompatibilities (so far, at
> l
libfossil, that's what it is.
But if you want to go down the living fossil path, Coelacanth. Just be careful
it doesn't become a coprolith.
On 30/07/2013, at 8:36 AM, Stephan Beal wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 3:33 PM, David Given wrote:
> Stephan Beal wrote:
> > - lib
>
> I really wa
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Stephan Beal wrote:
>
>
>> but it's a bit of a mouthful. 'Piltdown', perhaps?
>>
>
> i don't get the reference.
>
The "Piltdown man" was a hoax - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piltdown_Man
___
fossil-users mailing list
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 3:33 PM, David Given wrote:
> Stephan Beal wrote:
> > - lib
>
> I really want to suggest 'archeoraptor', being a famously fake fossil,
>
LOL! If i was working on a fork, THAT would be the name :).
> but it's a bit of a mouthful. 'Piltdown', perhaps?
>
i don't get the r
Stephan Beal wrote:
[...]
> - lib
I really want to suggest 'archeoraptor', being a famously fake fossil,
but it's a bit of a mouthful. 'Piltdown', perhaps?
--
┌─── ｄｇ＠ｃｏｗｌａｒｋ．ｃｏｍ ─ http://www.cowlark.com ─
│ "USER'S MANUAL VERSION 1.0: The information presented in this
│ publication has
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 3:10 PM, wrote:
> That seems to be the obvious choice. But if you want to get creative I
> would vote for a "living fossil".
>
As long as by "living fossil" you don't mean me ;).
- libginkgo - After 170 million years the living Ginkgo biloba looks pretty
> much identical
On 2013-07-30 06:06, Stephan Beal wrote:
The obvious choices include:
- libfossil - nothing wrong with that, IMO.
That seems to be the obvious choice. But if you want to get creative I
would vote for a "living fossil". My fossils are very much alive, thanks
to you guys :)
I'm partial to
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Paolo Bolzoni <
paolo.bolzoni.br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Or libfeather in honor to the fact we now know all dinosaurs had feathers.
> ;)
>
LOL!!
That is apparently only used in a Ruby lib and some "Fan Fiction" site.
Kidding a part I like libfossil, but maybe it
Or libfeather in honor to the fact we now know all dinosaurs had feathers. ;)
Kidding a part I like libfossil, but maybe it is a good occasion to remove the
ambiguity with that filesystem.
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Gautier DI FOLCO
wrote:
> 2013/7/30 Remigiusz Modrzejewski
>>
>>
>> On J
2013/7/30 Remigiusz Modrzejewski
>
> On Jul 30, 2013, at 12:06 , Stephan Beal wrote:
>
> > Hi, all,
> >
> > As most of you know, work has begun on a prototype of what i
> unfortunately
> > dubbed "fossil v2." As it turns out, everything i want to do can be done
> on
> > top of current repos, with
On Jul 30, 2013, at 12:06 , Stephan Beal wrote:
> Hi, all,
>
> As most of you know, work has begun on a prototype of what i unfortunately
> dubbed "fossil v2." As it turns out, everything i want to do can be done on
> top of current repos, with no repo-level incompatibilities (so far, at
> least
Hi, all,
As most of you know, work has begun on a prototype of what i unfortunately
dubbed "fossil v2." As it turns out, everything i want to do can be done on
top of current repos, with no repo-level incompatibilities (so far, at
least). That means it's not "really" v2, but instead provides an al
19 matches
Mail list logo
