Re: [fossil-users] New option --keep, and setting keep-glob for fossil clean

2013-05-22 Thread Jan Nijtmans
2013/5/21 Alaric Snell-Pym: I *love* it :-D ABS Thanks! As soon as my fossil clean proposal is evaluated, I'll rebase this and put this up for evaluation as well. Regards, Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-users mailing list

Re: [fossil-users] New option --keep, and setting keep-glob for fossil clean

2013-05-21 Thread Alaric Snell-Pym
On 14/05/13 16:11, Jan Nijtmans wrote: I think you will like this. I do! [snip] Feedback appreciated! I *love* it :-D ABS -- Alaric Snell-Pym http://www.snell-pym.org.uk/alaric/ ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org

Re: [fossil-users] New option --keep, and setting keep-glob for fossil clean

2013-05-14 Thread Jan Nijtmans
2013/5/7 Alaric Snell-Pym: Semi-relatedly, I have an ignore glob set that ignores *~ backup files that Emacs makes, as many do. However, I often work in a pattern of creating a bunch of files with the same base name and different extensions - such as foo.c and foo.h - and then have to do

[fossil-users] New option --keep, and setting keep-glob for fossil clean

2013-05-03 Thread Jan Nijtmans
Some time ago, I added versioned settings ignore-glob to Tcl's and Tk's fossil repositories, so fossil extras would not list all *.o files any more: I know that *.o files never should be committed, my expectation was that ignore-glob would prevent that. That worked fine, but it had the unexpected

Re: [fossil-users] New option --keep, and setting keep-glob for fossil clean

2013-05-03 Thread Jan Nijtmans
2013/5/3 Jan Nijtmans jan.nijtm...@gmail.com: Any other ideas? Should fossil clean be undo-able like fossil revert, or do we expect that people setting ignore-glob know what they are doing? Hm. I think an undo-able fossil clean is a good idea anyway for such a dangerous command. And it's

Re: [fossil-users] New option --keep, and setting keep-glob for fossil clean

2013-05-03 Thread Richard Hipp
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 8:09 AM, Jan Nijtmans jan.nijtm...@gmail.com wrote: 2013/5/3 Jan Nijtmans jan.nijtm...@gmail.com: Any other ideas? Should fossil clean be undo-able like fossil revert, or do we expect that people setting ignore-glob know what they are doing? Hm. I think an

Re: [fossil-users] New option --keep, and setting keep-glob for fossil clean

2013-05-03 Thread Richard Hipp
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 8:26 AM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 8:09 AM, Jan Nijtmans jan.nijtm...@gmail.comwrote: 2013/5/3 Jan Nijtmans jan.nijtm...@gmail.com: Any other ideas? Should fossil clean be undo-able like fossil revert, or do we expect that people

Re: [fossil-users] New option --keep, and setting keep-glob for fossil clean

2013-05-03 Thread Jan Nijtmans
2013/5/3 Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org: Or, perhaps there is a size limit (say 10MiB) above which cleaned files are not undoable. Prompt for conformation prior to deleting an oversized file that will not be undoable. That sounds OK to me. To be continued. Thanks! Jan Nijtmans