On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 11:40:49PM +0100, Thomas wrote:
> The biggest disadvantage - as my coworkers pointed out - is that the
> downloadable executables do not come with https enabled.
Curious how Git is used versus Fossil in your environment. Presumably some
server runs repositories that all
El 16 sept. 2017 0:39, "Warren Young" escribió:
> On Sep 14, 2017, at 11:12 PM, Johan Kuuse wrote:
>
> I would like to have a stronger argument against rebasing, preferrably
with an example.
It’s been hashed over here on the mailing list many times before.
> On Sep 14, 2017, at 11:12 PM, Johan Kuuse wrote:
>
> I would like to have a stronger argument against rebasing, preferrably with
> an example.
It’s been hashed over here on the mailing list many times before. Just search
the archives for “git rebase”.
The short argument I
On 15 September 2017 at 15:26, Olivier R. wrote:
> I also wonder what’s the best way to include a one-time patch without giving
> rights to the repository.
one word: bundles
--
Javier
___
fossil-users mailing list
Le 15/09/2017 à 00:40, Thomas a écrit :
Fossil is a great piece of softare. Its primary strength is certainly
that it is a single executable, easy to set up and easy to run as a CGI.
+1
It’s surprising to see how many features there is in a such small software.
The biggest disadvantage - as
$ ls -lh ~autobuild/aurae.fossil
-rw-r--r-- 1 autobuild users 11G Sep 15 12:05 /home/autobuild/aurae.fossil
On Fri, 15 Sep 2017, Thomas wrote:
On 2017-09-14 23:43, Richard Hipp wrote:
On 9/14/17, Thomas wrote:
The biggest disadvantage - as my coworkers pointed out -
Comments among Git users that I often hear are basically limited to two
questions:
1. Is there no 'rebase' command?
2. Don't you get commit hooks out-of-the-box?
The first question I vaguely answer with "The Fossil filosophy is
different", but I would like to have a stronger argument against
On 2017-09-14 23:43, Richard Hipp wrote:
On 9/14/17, Thomas wrote:
The biggest disadvantage - as my coworkers pointed out - is that the
downloadable executables do not come with https enabled.
At one time that was true. But I think all of the precompiled
binaries on
On 9/14/17, Thomas wrote:
>
> The biggest disadvantage - as my coworkers pointed out - is that the
> downloadable executables do not come with https enabled.
At one time that was true. But I think all of the precompiled
binaries on the site now have https enabled by
On 2017-09-14 16:55, Richard Hipp wrote:
If you'd like to help promote Fossil to unwashed masses who are still
using Git, perhaps like or retweet
https://twitter.com/robmurrer/status/908080904781869056 :-)
I never used Git but whenever I had an issue with Fossil I tried to find
what the Git
On 14 September 2017 at 09:12, Johan Kuuse wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 5:55 PM, Richard Hipp wrote:
>> If you'd like to help promote Fossil to unwashed masses who are still
>> using Git, perhaps like or retweet
>>
Done!
*michael at barrow dot me*
+1.541.600.2027
"Do not anticipate trouble, or
worry about what may never happen.
Keep in the sunlight." -- B. Franklin
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 8:55 AM, Richard Hipp wrote:
> If you'd like to help promote Fossil to unwashed masses who are
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 5:55 PM, Richard Hipp wrote:
> If you'd like to help promote Fossil to unwashed masses who are still
> using Git, perhaps like or retweet
> https://twitter.com/robmurrer/status/908080904781869056 :-)
Working in a 115,000 employers 3G/4G/5G international
If you'd like to help promote Fossil to unwashed masses who are still
using Git, perhaps like or retweet
https://twitter.com/robmurrer/status/908080904781869056 :-)
--
D. Richard Hipp
d...@sqlite.org
___
fossil-users mailing list
14 matches
Mail list logo