[fossil-users] Skins

2010-07-25 Thread Michael Richter
The skins available in the default build of fossil seem to be mislabelled. When I select the one labelled "plain grey, no logo", I get a plain grey theme with a big lighter-grey box that occupies 3/4 of the top (left-aligned) with a logo in the middle. "khaki, no logo" is what it says on the box.

[fossil-users] HTML Wiki but Still [] Links And No verbatim?

2010-07-25 Thread Zed A. Shaw
I seem to have stumbled onto a logical contradiction in the fossil setup and was wondering if folks could help: 1. Turn HTML wiki markup on in the Admin. Now and don't work because everything is HTML. 2. Put some python code in expecting it to get left alone [1,2,3,4]. 3. Find out that, no, fos

Re: [fossil-users] Thanks To Peter Krantz for Plain Wedding

2010-07-25 Thread Peter Krantz
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 05:09, Zed A. Shaw wrote: > > I've tweaked a few little things here and there but overall a very > nicely done.  Thanks again Peter. > A modest contribution. Thank you for creating some of the stuff I have been using over the years. If the markup could be extracted from t

Re: [fossil-users] Skins

2010-07-25 Thread Michael Richter
Looking more into the skinning issue, it looks to me like the file skins.c contains a bunch of stuff that could be generated trivially from a script of some sort. Is there any interest in me making the skinning system more flexible so it's easier to add a new skin by basically just checking in thr

Re: [fossil-users] Skins

2010-07-25 Thread Peter Krantz
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 13:39, Michael Richter wrote: > Is there any interest in me making the skinning system more > flexible so it's easier to add a new skin by basically just checking in > three files under a new directory?  The idea would be something like this: That would be brilliant! As yo

Re: [fossil-users] Skins

2010-07-25 Thread Peter Krantz
I guess your proposal is related to the ticket I filed here: http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/tktview?name=49395d4e70 Although it looks like the proposal is moving towards a templating system I believe it will make changes easier. Right now people have to submit patches of C code for trivial UI ch

Re: [fossil-users] Skins

2010-07-25 Thread Richard Hipp
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 7:39 AM, Michael Richter wrote: > Looking more into the skinning issue, it looks to me like the file skins.c > contains a bunch of stuff that could be generated trivially from a script of > some sort. Is there any interest in me making the skinning system more > flexible s

Re: [fossil-users] Skins

2010-07-25 Thread Zed A. Shaw
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 07:39:28PM +0800, Michael Richter wrote: > Looking more into the skinning issue, it looks to me like the file skins.c > contains a bunch of stuff that could be generated trivially from a script of > some sort. Is there any interest in me making the skinning system more > fl

Re: [fossil-users] Skins

2010-07-25 Thread Richard Hipp
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 1:25 PM, Zed A. Shaw wrote: > On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 07:39:28PM +0800, Michael Richter wrote: > > Looking more into the skinning issue, it looks to me like the file > skins.c > > contains a bunch of stuff that could be generated trivially from a script > of > > some sort.

[fossil-users] Proposed Change To Wiki vs. HTML

2010-07-25 Thread Zed A. Shaw
Alright so I'm going through the code for wiki_convert and thinking about the problems I've been having with using HTML for wiki, but having that setting bleed into all inputs in the system. I think I have a simple solution, but let me know what people think: 1. The setting to use HTML for the wi

Re: [fossil-users] Proposed Change To Wiki vs. HTML

2010-07-25 Thread Richard Hipp
I really, really do not like the Use-HTML-Wiki switch and I rue the day that I ever allowed that into the code. I have no desire to make the situation worse by making the Use-HTML-Wiki switch even more complicated. What Use-HTML-Wiki really comes down to is yet another "wiki mode". Everybody (me

Re: [fossil-users] Proposed Change To Wiki vs. HTML

2010-07-25 Thread Zed A. Shaw
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 05:47:56PM -0400, Richard Hipp wrote: > For embedded documentation, file that end in .html or .htm are rendered as > pure HTML with no interpretation and with no header or footer added. File > that end in ".wiki" are rendered using Fossil wiki. Files that end in > ".creole

Re: [fossil-users] Proposed Change To Wiki vs. HTML

2010-07-25 Thread Zed A. Shaw
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 04:13:47PM -0700, Zed A. Shaw wrote: > Actually, none of this is necessary if you solve this one simple > problem: > > .html will not have the header and active login state of a user, so I > have to use "wiki", but wiki then has its own set of problems. Ok, so I've been ab