Hello,
fossil ls is documented as:
Usage: fossil ls ?OPTIONS? ?VERSION? ?FILENAMES?
The ?VERSION? led me to believe I could get info about older
revisions this way. After some problems I resorted to source-diving
and it seem that fossil ls is purely about the current checkout,
and there is no
Hi Stephan,
On 24 February 2015 at 18:29, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote:
i.e. CLI vs WWW.
@Jungle, some of those differences are expected (or not unexpected), by
the way, namely the Database Stats.
Sorry to have mislead this and made it difficult to follow!
Yes, I meant my
On 2/25/15, Kai Lauterbach kla...@web.de wrote:
Hi,
in my other thread I asked for help to insert a navigation bar into my
wiki pages.
During this work I got serious error messages in my browser console:
Uncaught SyntaxError: Unexpected token }
It seems to be that there is a typo in th
Wow! Already fixed -- Execute 'optional' SQL statements in their
original order https://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/info/24d7ebe12afa2f72
Thanks
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
On Wed, 25 Feb 2015, Stephan Beal wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 9:11 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
So it seems like having dates on the download would be more
meaningful than having a made-up version number. No? With a
date, at least you know about how old the
Hi Peter,
On 25 February 2015 at 04:49, Peter Spjuth peter.spj...@gmail.com wrote:
The ?VERSION? led me to believe I could get info about older
revisions this way. After some problems I resorted to source-diving
and it seem that fossil ls is purely about the current checkout,
and there is no
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 8:03 PM, jungle Boogie jungleboog...@gmail.com
wrote:
For my day job, version numbers in ANY capacity are out of the
equation (NOT my choice). The project in question either in trunk/head
or its in some branch. It pretty much means filing bug reports are
useless since
On 25 February 2015 at 11:03, Ron W ronw.m...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 8:03 PM, jungle Boogie jungleboog...@gmail.com
wrote:
For my day job, version numbers in ANY capacity are out of the
equation (NOT my choice). The project in question either in trunk/head
or its in some
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 8:00 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
On 2/24/15, Ron W ronw.m...@gmail.com wrote:
[Managers] associate dates with deadlines, so version numbers remove
a source of panic.
Fair enough. I'll migrate from dates to version numbers in the next
release.
I was
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 3:37 AM, Gaurav M. Bhandarkar gaurav.a...@gmail.com
wrote:
How is the output lines, eg 16:06 Edit [72114148]: Edit check-in comment.
(user: drh) [details], related to most recent tags.
For a check-in (or a ticket), comment is a tag. The comment tag also
has a value,
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 11:13:22PM +0300, Sergei Gavrikov wrote:
If we all were paleontologists, we could use the names of fossil animals
for significant milestones of Fossil SCM
What fossil are of interested other than Trilobites?!
Joerg
___
Thus said Gaurav M. Bhandarkar on Wed, 25 Feb 2015 14:07:08 +0530:
if a branch is marked as closed, it is (by default) hidden
Oh, I think I understood the significance of unhide. Thanks for
explaining.
Unless I have missed something, closing a branch does not hide the
branch.
Archeopteryx (proto-bird)
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 1:12 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger
jo...@britannica.bec.de wrote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 11:13:22PM +0300, Sergei Gavrikov wrote:
If we all were paleontologists, we could use the names of fossil animals
for significant milestones of Fossil SCM
What
Looks like %W is used instead of %w in rendering checkin comments. Any
checkin comment containing the character '' will be rendered
incorrectly.
This patch (against b0febccc4e) cleans it up and corrects the comment
in printf.c. Hope it formats correctly!
Index: src/info.c
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 7:42 PM, Andy Goth andrew.m.g...@gmail.com wrote:
Easiest way to demonstrate this problem is to go to:
http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/timeline?y=ci
which should initially show Without Files. Select With Files, then
press the browser's Back button.
At this
On 2/25/15, Ron W ronw.m...@gmail.com wrote:
As best I can recall, this is the same behavior I've seen with many other
web apps, including a few I worked on. My work around for this was to
include a Javascript function, triggered by the onload event, to reset
selection menus to the options
On 2/25/15, aspect asp...@abstracted-spleen.org wrote:
Looks like %W is used instead of %w in rendering checkin comments. Any
checkin comment containing the character '' will be rendered
incorrectly.
This patch (against b0febccc4e) cleans it up and corrects the comment
in printf.c. Hope it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The new select menus don't play well with the back button in Firefox 36.0,
likely other versions too. After pressing back, the menu shows not the old
option but rather the option that was selected in order to transition to the
new page.
For
Hi Andy,
On 25 February 2015 at 16:12, Andy Goth andrew.m.g...@gmail.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The new select menus don't play well with the back button in Firefox 36.0,
likely other versions too. After pressing back, the menu shows not the old
option but
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2/25/2015 6:32 PM, jungle Boogie wrote:
On 25 February 2015 at 16:12, Andy Goth andrew.m.g...@gmail.com
wrote:
The new select menus don't play well with the back button in
Firefox 36.0, likely other versions too. After pressing back,
the
Hi Andy,
On 25 February 2015 at 16:42, Andy Goth andrew.m.g...@gmail.com wrote:
Easiest way to demonstrate this problem is to go to:
http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/timeline?y=ci
which should initially show Without Files. Select With Files, then
press the browser's Back button.
At
Tags are symbolic names that may or may not be propagate
Yes. But what does the page :
https://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/timeline?n=50y=gv=0
mean by 50 most recent tags ?
How is the output lines, eg 16:06 Edit [72114148]: Edit check-in comment.
(user: drh) [details], related to most recent
22 matches
Mail list logo
