Re: [fossil-users] Lost "reparented" check-ins after rebuild

2017-07-02 Thread Florian Balmer
> Reparenting is for doing one-time major surgery operations on a Fossil > repo, not for everyday use. Thank you very much for your comments, and for your suggestions about dealing with unwanted check-ins. I take great care to keep my Fossil repositories intact, and no such thing as a "reparent"

Re: [fossil-users] Lost "reparented" check-ins after rebuild

2017-06-29 Thread Warren Young
On Jun 28, 2017, at 5:13 AM, Florian Balmer wrote: > > I have a repository with 4 "reparented" check-ins (to skip over > unwanted check-ins) It appears that you’re trying to treat Fossil like Git. Fossil reparenting is similar to Git rebasing, but it should not be used nearly as frequently. R

[fossil-users] Lost "reparented" check-ins after rebuild

2017-06-28 Thread Florian Balmer
I have a repository with 4 "reparented" check-ins (to skip over unwanted check-ins), which were later merged into other branches. When rebuilding the repository, I noticed that the number of check-ins on the /stats webpage had dropped by 4, and the /bloblist page showed "unknown" instead of "check