This is would be very interesting but usefulness will be a bit limited
because people use Google to search instead of Wikipedia. Probably we will
get a list of read links clicked by readers they don’t know there is not an
article yet.
A complementary approach could be having a list of most
Is it just me, then, that finds it easier and quicker to read top post replies
than to search through large amounts of text to find the response? Inline
posting makes sense if you're replying to an email that makes its point in the
space of a few lines, but otherwise it seems easier to me to
2010/6/13 Jussi-Ville Heiskanen cimonav...@gmail.com
Gerard Meijssen wrote:
Hoi,
This is not a problem. We use the numbers that we have. We could ask
Google
for such numbers.. They might even be willing to share them with us.
Thanks,
GerardM
This is not only directed at you
On 14 Jun 2010, at 09:05, Michael Peel em...@mikepeel.net wrote:
Is it just me, then, that finds it easier and quicker to read top
post replies than to search through large amounts of text to find
the response? Inline posting makes sense if you're replying to an
email that makes its
On 14 Jun 2010, at 10:22, Jon Harald Søby jhs...@gmail.com wrote:
Tell me, how is top-posting worse than derailing a productive thread
with an
off-topic rant?
:-)
How true.
AGK
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
On Monday 14 June 2010 02:52 PM, Jon Harald Søby wrote:
Tell me, how is top-posting worse than derailing a productive thread with an
off-topic rant?
Thanks.
praveenp
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Casey Brown li...@caseybrown.org wrote:
Actually, I think Jussi-Ville's comment was very useful
For the record, I was talking about the point behind Jussi-Ville's
post and not about his colorful characterization of top-posters,
which was really not helpful at
Hoi,
An important thread has been derailed by an off topic comment. For your
information, and for the somanyth time, top posting comes easy when you use
a modern tool like GMAIL. It automatically hides whatever came before. This
whole notion has no relevance to me as a consequence. I get hundreds
Gerard Meijssen, 14/06/2010 13:44:
For me KTHX is
one such, the top rated result makes it a radio station and it took me some
time to find that it is likely to mean Ok, thanks.
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/kthx
Time: 1 s?
Nemo
___
foundation-l
Sincerely wikimedia team.
I have a simple question. I would like to make a proposal to add an
application (link) wikipedia offline here:
http://dumps.wikimedia.org/dvd.html
Who should I contact?
The project that I want to add is called Kiwix and is free:
http://www.kiwix.org
Thank you very
Sorry for going off-topic again in an off-topic thread of a really
interesting on-topic thread..
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 2:17 PM, Federico Leva (Nemo) nemow...@gmail.comwrote:
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/kthx
Time: 1 s?
If you don't count the probability that one gets stuck on Wikipedia
Michael Peel em...@mikepeel.net wrote:
[...]
Of course, any way that people reply always leaves duplicate and unnecessary
text in the email, which can be a pain when you're catching up with a large
number of emails in a thread. That's just one of the downsides of the mailing
list format,
Wilfredo Rodriguez wrote:
Sincerely wikimedia team.
I have a simple question. I would like to make a proposal to add an
application (link) wikipedia offline here:
http://dumps.wikimedia.org/dvd.html
Who should I contact?
The project that I want to add is called Kiwix and is free:
On 06/14/2010 04:44 AM, Gerard Meijssen wrote:
For your
information, and for the somanyth time, top posting comes easy when you use
a modern tool like GMAIL. It automatically hides whatever came before. This
whole notion has no relevance to me as a consequence. I get hundreds of
mails and
Thank Platonides.
The bug link is here:
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23958
--
Lcdo. Wilfredo Rafael Rodríguez Hernández
msn,googletalk = wilfre...@gmail.com
cv = http://www.wilfredor.co.cc
blog =
kthx
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 12:44 PM, Gerard Meijssen
gerard.meijs...@gmail.com wrote:
Hoi,
An important thread has been derailed by an off topic comment. For your
information, and for the somanyth time, top posting comes easy when you use
a modern tool like GMAIL. It automatically hides
I'm very disappointed that this discussion has continued at the
expense of one that I find to be much more important to our projects.
Can all of us go back over there and stop talking about this? Kthx.
m.
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Domas Mituzas midom.li...@gmail.com wrote:
kthx
On
Mark Williamson wrote:
I'm very disappointed that this discussion has continued at the
expense of one that I find to be much more important to our projects.
Can all of us go back over there and stop talking about this? Kthx.
I agree. I made my point. You either get it, or you don't.
Yours,
Hoi,
I agree, I replied and made my point, You either accept it or you don't.
Thanks,
GerardM
PS I get it.
On 14 June 2010 22:21, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen cimonav...@gmail.com wrote:
Mark Williamson wrote:
I'm very disappointed that this discussion has continued at the
expense of one
It is actually gratifying to notice that you actually
do know how to remove parts of a message you are
replying to, which aren't necessary for comprehension.
Thank you very much.
Yours,
Jussi-Ville Heiskanen
___
foundation-l mailing list
We developed clicktracking to see what buttons were being used on our
toolbar. It was enabled for all Wikimedia projects that had the
usability toolbar and only gave us information of the type that a user
who has an edit count of 3 just clicked the 'bold' button. Collecting
such data for
Thomas Dalton wrote:
On 13 June 2010 23:33, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen cimonav...@gmail.com wrote:
If there is any party with dibs on Wiki, that would
be Ward Cunningham, not the WMF.
Trademark law does not include an automatic right to dibs on a mark
to the first person to use it. (At
On 15 June 2010 00:17, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen cimonav...@gmail.com wrote:
You are claiming the law is complicated. But the facts are
plain and simple, and no amount of FUDD is going to support
a view that there is any reasonable justification (by moral
or juridifical standards) to claim WMF is
On 15 June 2010 00:17, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen cimonav...@gmail.com wrote:
I happen to know there is an English phrase Doctor, heal
thyself.
You probably ANAL. But that doesn't stop you from FUDDing.
I'm an anal non-lawyer, at that! I may be spreading uncertainty and
doubt and something that is
On 15 June 2010 00:20, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
On 15 June 2010 00:17, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen cimonav...@gmail.com wrote:
You are claiming the law is complicated. But the facts are
plain and simple, and no amount of FUDD is going to support
a view that there is any reasonable
Thomas Dalton wrote:
On 15 June 2010 00:17, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen cimonav...@gmail.com wrote:
I happen to know there is an English phrase Doctor, heal
thyself.
You probably ANAL. But that doesn't stop you from FUDDing.
I'm an anal non-lawyer, at that! I may be spreading
On 15 June 2010 00:25, Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not suggesting we should claim a trademark on the word wiki (it
wouldn't stand up). I'm suggesting that wiki when used as the name
of an encyclopaedia is sufficiently similar to Wikipedia to cause
confusion in the market
27 matches
Mail list logo
