Bonjour
Could you change the url for wikiwix, just remove lang=fr, since currently
the search results are french and not ml as expected.
Cordialement
Pascal Martin
06 13 89 77 32
02 32 40 23 69
- Original Message -
From: Mike Dupont jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com
To: Wikimedia
On Dec 8, 2010, at 6:21 PM, Mike Dupont wrote:
Sounds like we need to have a notable search engine that includes only
approved and allowed sources, that would be nice to have.
Sounds like a great community project, Wiki Search!
Domas
___
Wikipedia does not have an Executive Director, or anything of the
sort. That title suggests that Sue has the final say over content. I
don't think it should be used anywhere.
But, thanks for at least removing it from the 'smaller' projects.
--
John Vandenberg
we must raise $14 million
ouch, this is painful. Like many chapters probably I have been trying
to explain to people the difference between Wikimedia and Wikipedia,
and that Wikipedia has no such thing as a board of editors or even a
board of directors, but that the Wikimedia Foundation has, etc - and
now we are running a
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Domas Mituzas midom.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Dec 8, 2010, at 6:21 PM, Mike Dupont wrote:
Sounds like we need to have a notable search engine that includes only
approved and allowed sources, that would be nice to have.
Sounds like a great community project,
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Domas Mituzas midom.li...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Dec 8, 2010, at 6:21 PM, Mike Dupont wrote:
Sounds like we need to have a notable search engine that includes only
approved and allowed sources, that would be nice to have.
Sounds like a great community project,
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 12:52 PM, Fred Bauder fredb...@fairpoint.net wrote:
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Domas Mituzas midom.li...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Dec 8, 2010, at 6:21 PM, Mike Dupont wrote:
Sounds like we need to have a notable search engine that includes only
approved and allowed
On 9 December 2010 10:00, Lodewijk lodew...@effeietsanders.org wrote:
ouch, this is painful. Like many chapters probably I have been trying
to explain to people the difference between Wikimedia and Wikipedia,
and that Wikipedia has no such thing as a board of editors or even a
board of
Quite a lot of people know that Wikipedia is one of the 10 most popular
sites in the world.
Much less people notice that among the most popular Wikipedia is the only
one that doesn't sell them anything: Google has Adwords, Microsoft sells its
products and all the other websites have advertising
I hope that it will be possible to make this small change from a p into an m.
Yeah, it's not like it's even in a graphic, it's a text page -- easy
fix. But I'd suggest adding Foundation in there too. As it
stands presently it looks like the site was hacked.
Hi!
Much less people notice that among the most popular Wikipedia is the only
one that doesn't sell them anything
We don't sell, we just hold reference material at ransom.
Don't be too ecstatic, it comes with a cost.
As for Alexa, it has the list polluted by multiple mega-company properties
I think that this list is re-posted in other newsgroup compilations
websites. Also, the tar.gz archives sorted by month are available in the
mailing list site.
2010/12/8 wjhon...@aol.com
What is the perceived limitation(s) on mirroring this email list ?
That is, making copies of it, on other
Gmane being one example: http://gmane.org/find.php?list=wikimedia
Lets you view as a newsgroup or an RSS feed too. Clever stuff.
Pete / the wub
On 9 December 2010 16:40, emijrp emi...@gmail.com wrote:
I think that this list is re-posted in other newsgroup compilations
websites. Also, the
All -
We're going to test Wikimedia against Wikipedia in the banner right now.
Sorry for not starting with Wikimedia and testing pedia after, but we're
trying to iterate as close to one variable at a time. Jimmy and the editor
banners all said pedia.
The fact is that most of our donors -- and
The fact is that most of our donors -- and more of our potential donors --
don't know what Wikimedia Foundation is
Use it on banners and they will be know, but not by Wikipedia directors
przykuta
___
foundation-l mailing list
Hello,
I don't like to send emails like this but I don't see a solution other than
this.
I understand that we need money to keep the Wikimedia Foundation running,
and yes I support the fundraiser and I donated money. But do we want money
because we told people other things than the truth I find
I don't support this word choice: on twitter.com Japanese speaking
reader mistook it as one of English Wikipedia admins someone who
writes articles etc.
Not only smaller projects but also on the Wikipedia, this factual
error is better to correct I think. I heard it placed only on enwiki
(in a
1) No real names will be disclosed on this list on account of the request made.
2) No action is asked or expected.
These two personal commitments are important before answering an
absolutely legitimate request for clarification: why [is] this issue
of such [...] importance to the
That won't help much.
If I understand your email correctly, you want the information in order to
protest on pt.wiki - either about your name being used or about being
blocked for mentioning other users' names.
There are problems with this.
1. The thread started by saying it is inaccurate to
Hi,
I've got an error message in trying to access Japanese Wikipedia. It
seems long, but it's not my topic.
IIRC the message from server was multilingualized years ago and we
have offered the message with links to other lang
same messages.
The message itself seems not changed from the past, but
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 7:59 PM, Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.com wrote:
On 9 December 2010 18:54, Michael Snow wikipe...@frontier.com wrote:
While I understand the challenges in communicating effectively with a
variety of audiences, I think the point that's been raised is that for a
Hello,
I don't like to send emails like this but I don't see a solution other than
this.
I understand that we need money to keep the Wikimedia Foundation running,
and yes I support the fundraiser and I donated money. But do we want money
because we told people other things than the truth I find
2010/12/9 Delphine Ménard notafi...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 7:59 PM, Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.com wrote:
On 9 December 2010 18:54, Michael Snow wikipe...@frontier.com wrote:
While I understand the challenges in communicating effectively with a
variety of audiences, I think
2010/12/9 KIZU Naoko aph...@gmail.com:
I don't support this word choice: on twitter.com Japanese speaking
reader mistook it as one of English Wikipedia admins someone who
writes articles etc.
Not only smaller projects but also on the Wikipedia, this factual
error is better to correct I
FT2,
Please let it go - I talked with Virgilio off-list yesterday; it sounds like
he didn't mean to stir up a storm, and would rather this thread die.
Thanks,
Ryan
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 3:23 PM, FT2 ft2.w...@gmail.com wrote:
That won't help much.
If I understand your email correctly, you
In a message dated 12/9/2010 2:51:39 AM Pacific Standard Time,
jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com writes:
yes it would be great. As i said, it could just include all pages
listed as REF pages and that would allow people to review the results
and find pages that should not belong.
We also need
Am I placed on moderation? all my previous emails seem to fail?
2010/12/9 Austin Hair adh...@gmail.com
2010/12/9 KIZU Naoko aph...@gmail.com:
I don't support this word choice: on twitter.com Japanese speaking
reader mistook it as one of English Wikipedia admins someone who
writes
2010/12/9 Huib Laurens sterke...@gmail.com:
Am I placed on moderation? all my previous emails seem to fail?
I've received this email...
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
You don't receive your own mails. We got two copies of your previous
mail. You can check on the pipermail. [1]
[1]: http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/
On 09/12/2010 19:39, Huib Laurens wrote:
Am I placed on moderation? all my previous emails seem to fail?
2010/12/9 Austin
On 9 December 2010 18:54, Michael Snow wikipe...@frontier.com wrote:
it into the story for fundraising and other communications. We need to
both make sense and be accurate. If it's accurate and doesn't make
sense, it probably won't be effective, but also just because something
makes sense to
2010/12/9 Huib Laurens sterke...@gmail.com:
Am I placed on moderation? all my previous emails seem to fail?
You are definitely not on moderation, and I don't see any record of
you ever being on moderation.
If you have any doubts about whether a message of yours has gone
through, you can contact
I switched the option on to get notification when my emails get to the
list... But that seems to stopped working today?
2010/12/9 Noein prono...@gmail.com
You don't receive your own mails. We got two copies of your previous
mail. You can check on the pipermail. [1]
[1]:
I'm not going to debate the whole wording thing, but I will point out,
It is a crime to receive property/goods under false pretenses in
Australia which is what advertising a person with the incorrect job
title would be. Don't forget it isn't only the foundation handling the
donations this year,
On 9 December 2010 23:03, K. Peachey p858sn...@yahoo.com.au wrote:
I'm not going to debate the whole wording thing, but I will point out,
It is a crime to receive property/goods under false pretenses in
Australia which is what advertising a person with the incorrect job
title would be. Don't
Sure (and in reply to your off-list mail, it's fine, easily done).
The questions seemed genuine and seeking a genuine explanation. If it's been
covered elsewhere that's good enough.
FT2
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 10:32 PM, Ryan Lomonaco wiki.ral...@gmail.comwrote:
FT2,
Please let it go - I
On 12/9/2010 3:03 PM, K. Peachey wrote:
I'm not going to debate the whole wording thing, but I will point out,
It is a crime to receive property/goods under false pretenses in
Australia which is what advertising a person with the incorrect job
title would be. Don't forget it isn't only the
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 10:03 AM, K. Peachey p858sn...@yahoo.com.au wrote:
I'm not going to debate the whole wording thing, but I will point out,
It is a crime to receive property/goods under false pretenses in
Australia which is what advertising a person with the incorrect job
title would be.
Michael Snow wrote:
On 12/9/2010 3:03 PM, K. Peachey wrote:
I'm not going to debate the whole wording thing, but I will point out,
It is a crime to receive property/goods under false pretenses in
Australia which is what advertising a person with the incorrect job
title would be. Don't forget
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 10:19 AM, John Vandenberg jay...@gmail.com wrote:
This is an important point to raise regarding cultural and legal
differences in regards to advertising, however the banner in question
is not appearing in Australia.
The Australian chapter is managing the banners and
KIZU Naoko wrote:
I've got an error message in trying to access Japanese Wikipedia. It
seems long, but it's not my topic.
IIRC the message from server was multilingualized years ago and we
have offered the message with links to other lang
same messages.
The message itself seems not changed
On 12/9/2010 3:28 PM, MZMcBride wrote:
Calling Jimmy Wikipedia founder was already incredibly close to crossing
the line. Calling Sue Wikipedia Executive Director clearly crosses the
line. From reading your posts today, I believe you agree.
While I didn't and wouldn't raise the issue of
Michael Snow wrote:
On 12/9/2010 3:28 PM, MZMcBride wrote:
Calling Jimmy Wikipedia founder was already incredibly close to crossing
the line. Calling Sue Wikipedia Executive Director clearly crosses the
line. From reading your posts today, I believe you agree.
While I didn't and wouldn't
OK, everyone -- I learned my lesson! Thanks for teaching it.
I was looking at it from the perspective of the reader who has never heard
the word Wikimedia. There are millions and millions of them. Luckily they
simply think we are misspelling Wikipedia, and are donating anyways. We will
continue
Hi everyone -
First, let me thank you all for your concern about the recent banners. Michael
Snow is right - we tested some things, thinking that we could manage to raise
the yield slightly by deliberately attempting to clarify (not to confuse) for
people that the Wikimedia Foundation was
Philippe Beaudette wrote:
With that said, the banners are being changed right now - they'll say
Wikimedia.
Thank you. :-)
I think you and the fundraising team this year have done a much, much better
job engaging and including the community than any past Wikimedia fundraiser.
This definitely
2010/12/9 Huib Laurens sterke...@gmail.com:
I switched the option on to get notification when my emails get to the
list... But that seems to stopped working today?
Gmail is helpful and won't show you a copy of any email you sent.
And there's no way to get it to.
- d.
On 12/9/2010 4:12 PM, MZMcBride wrote:
Michael Snow wrote:
Assuming good faith, I think it crossed a line as far as accuracy goes,
but being misguided or inartful hardly makes it sleazy.
Assuming good faith is what Newyorkbrad did when he suggested that it was
simply a typo. There is no
--- On Mon, 6/12/10, Mariano Cecowski marianocecow...@yahoo.com.ar wrote:
Date: Monday, 6 December, 2010, 19:40
I'm sorry we are putting more energy
into what should be banned from commons instead of searching
for mechanisms to protect those readers who would prefer to
stay away from such
On 9 December 2010 23:50, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
KIZU Naoko wrote:
I've got an error message in trying to access Japanese Wikipedia. It
seems long, but it's not my topic.
IIRC the message from server was multilingualized years ago and we
have offered the message with links to
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 11:20 AM, Philippe Beaudette
pbeaude...@wikimedia.org wrote:
When we get letters saying things like I'd donate, but only to Wikipedia,
not to Wikimedia, it spells out for us that it's possible we could attract
more people with the institution of Wikipedia than the
Peter Coombe wrote:
The 404 error you linked to (http://ja.wikipedia.org/w/amp) could
certainly be improved, though as far as I know it's always been like
that. Absurd really, how many users who've mistyped an address are
going to want a database dump?
There's a bug about improving the 404
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 10:35 AM, Michael Snow wikipe...@frontier.com wrote:
No, K. Peachey avoided citing actions by not debating the whole wording
thing that would establish what the action entailed, offering instead a
generic description of criminal law that would encourage people, in
Thanks Zack and Phillippe, I think you guys made the right call. This
is exactly how Foundation action and community feedback should work. I
think we all appreciate your quick response to our concerns. I
disagree with any implication that your decision was in some way
immoral; your perspectives
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Stephen Bain stephen.b...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the explanation. It seems some people assumed bad faith
before, when really we can see it was just a good-natured attempt to
deceive these people as to where their money would go.
Maybe you're trying to be
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Peter Coombe
thewub.w...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 10 December 2010 00:47, Peter Coombe thewub.w...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 9 December 2010 23:50, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
KIZU Naoko wrote:
I've got an error message in trying to access Japanese
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Philippe Beaudette
pbeaude...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Hi everyone -
First, let me thank you all for your concern about the recent banners.
Michael Snow is right - we tested some things, thinking that we could manage
to raise the yield slightly by deliberately
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Zack Exley zex...@wikimedia.org wrote:
OK, everyone -- I learned my lesson! Thanks for teaching it.
I was looking at it from the perspective of the reader who has never heard
the word Wikimedia. There are millions and millions of them. Luckily they
simply
I didn't like the assumption of bad faith earlier on part of the team, the
fundraising team [1] as you would note, consists of Community members from
different locations and backgrounds. I am from India, Moushirah is from
Egypt, Dan and James are community members who also work remotely, all of us
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 12:35 AM, theo10011 de10...@gmail.com wrote:
I didn't like the assumption of bad faith earlier on part of the team, the
fundraising team [1] as you would note, consists of Community members from
different locations and backgrounds. I am from India, Moushirah is from
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 6:02 PM, wjhon...@aol.com wrote:
In a message dated 12/9/2010 2:51:39 AM Pacific Standard Time,
jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com writes:
yes it would be great. As i said, it could just include all pages
listed as REF pages and that would allow people to review the
--- El jue 9-dic-10, Andreas Kolbe jayen...@yahoo.com escribió:
De: Andreas Kolbe jayen...@yahoo.com
Asunto: Re: [Foundation-l] 2010 Wikimedia Study of Controversial Content
Para: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Fecha: jueves, 9 de diciembre de 2010, 22:46
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 1:16 AM, Zack Exley zex...@wikimedia.org wrote:
OK, everyone -- I learned my lesson! Thanks for teaching it.
They say you are not really part of the tech team until you have
broken the site. I guess you are not really part of the Wikimedia
community until you've got a
62 matches
Mail list logo
