of the wiki editors had noticed this apparent
change of status during the last 3.5 years.
-Robert Rohde
[1] http://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/text.jsp?file_id=241541 (English version)
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe
thing that is clear though is that any claim to
public domain status due to the lack of copyright relations needs to
address all three factors raised above. John, can you raise these
concerns at Wikisource?
-Robert Rohde
___
foundation-l mailing list
, but at the very least
such templates need to be consistent with Berne / US laws regarding
the treatment of content from non-treaty states. In my opinion, the
larger ethical issues still deserve further consideration though.
-Robert Rohde
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 10:29 AM, Michael Snow wikipe...@frontier.com
in prior emails on
this thread.
-Robert Rohde
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
set a precedent for what we ultimately do on the other
projects.
-Robert Rohde
[1] http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2005-August/027373.html
[2]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Copyrights#Usage_Option_1_Support
[3]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Copyrights
has.
So, it seems like it might not even be a real screenshot of Wikipedia,
but rather a page that had been further edited for their purposes.
For example, they easily could have swapped in a public domain image
of the moon from NASA.
-Robert Rohde
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 8:49 AM, Kim Bruning k
that this was one of the major underlying
motivations.
-Robert Rohde
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
a filter that is
sort-of-okay some of the time would be helpful to the people who want
filtering.
-Robert Rohde
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
perceptions of that famous quote have been evolving alongside our
perceptions of what Wikimedia and Wikipedia have become.
-Robert Rohde
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman
if they have no
claim to notability at all. In general, notability has very little
to do with Commons at any level.
-Robert Rohde
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo
to do so and there is no need to panic.
-Robert Rohde
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
. In addition, the
communication with the community about the fundraiser seems to have
improved over previous years.
So great work guys. Keep it up.
-Robert Rohde
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 3:45 PM, Przykuta przyk...@o2.pl wrote:
:]
http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Special:FundraiserStatistics
than the low end, largely because
About would seem to be a better analog of what we do than Facebook is.
But I also think it would be interesting to look at other
comparisons.
-Robert Rohde
[1] http://www.nytco.com/pdf/annual_2009/2009NYTannual.pdf
given month about a million
anon accounts do edit. However, the number of anon accounts with at
least 5 edits in any particular month is definitely not millions, it
is several tens of thousands.
-Robert Rohde
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l
I would also like to add my gratitude to Mike for his years of useful
service. It is hard to imagine who could be a suitable replacement.
-Robert Rohde
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 11:20 AM, Ting Chen wing.phil...@gmx.de wrote:
Again Kat found the right words. Thank you very much Mike for all
/siteinfo/wikipedia.org
-Robert Rohde
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Joan Goma jrg...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there any explanation for the extraordinary jump in page views this
month?
http://stats.wikimedia.org/EN/TablesPageViewsMonthly.htm
on another project.
Circa last May, roughly 15% of new EN wikipedia accounts were being
created by SUL cross-overs. Even if you assume that none of these
were to engage in editing, it still means that at least 80% of the
unused accounts were created via local registration.
-Robert Rohde
, but
regardless of the details, I think this is a very important avenue for
outreach and growth.
-Robert Rohde
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
that archive web
content is a good one, but I don't know that IA is really in a
position to be all that useful.
-Robert Rohde
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 6:57 AM, emijrp emi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all;
I want to make a proposal about external links preservation. Many times,
when you check
it.
-Robert Rohde
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
restrictive privacy policy
governing their own content, then that seems fine, but I suspect they
would have a difficult uphill battle to extend that decision beyond
their own immediate sphere of influence.
-Robert Rohde
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation
to a longer campaign and
accomplish the same effect as a big banner with a shorter campaign.
Personally, I think it would feel less imposing and more friendly to
have a smaller banner than ran longer.
That's just my two cents.
-Robert Rohde
___
foundation
Er, I mean: I think it would feel less imposing and more friendly to
have a smaller banner THAT ran longer.
Silly typo.
-Robert Rohde
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman
. This makes the files more easily
scalable (and more compatible with SVG in general), but it also makes
the sensation of depth less realistic. Is this a deliberate choice,
and if so, why?
-Robert Rohde
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l
it bolder, see:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_pump_%28technical%29#New_logo
-Robert Rohde
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
to harm the people in the images.
-Robert Rohde
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
of what the issue is and consider the best ways to
address it.
I've compiled the list at:
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:List_of_genitalia_for_review
(There are actually only 411 on the list, as I dropped 14 after my
editor mangled the UTF8).
-Robert Rohde
a position on the appropriate use of sexual content?
-Robert Rohde
[1] http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Jimbo_Wales
[2] http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Village_pump#Cleanup_policy
(and following sections)
[3] http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons_talk:Sexual_content
[4] http
and needs to be considered by reusers, which includes those
navigational templates. The logo at the upper left is different in
that regard since it isn't part of the dumps.
-Robert Rohde
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
to avoid a copyrighted logo.
-Robert Rohde
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
-by-Wikimedia templates, but we can go and fix that.
-Robert Rohde
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
compressed to make it fit in the
space available, but that's entirely reversible of course.
-Robert Rohde
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
to ever really know whether this
particular image was child porn unless the uploader chooses to
confess.
-Robert Rohde
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
such
collections grow far beyond the applications we have for them.
-Robert Rohde
[1]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Privatemusings/ImagesUsedInVideoPresentation
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https
is okay, and I don't see
why we couldn't ask for the same thing here. And, in the unfortunate
event that things aren't okay, we would be able to point a specific
individual who misled us rather than simply saying that we closed our
eyes and didn't care.
-Robert Rohde
://stats.grok.se/en/200912/Craig%20Newmark
-Robert Rohde
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Robert Rohde raro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 5:05 AM, geni geni...@gmail.com wrote:
There is one point left. We can't measure the change in traffic to
Craigslist but we can measure this:
http://stats.grok.se/en/200912/Craigslist
If you
director can
share a similar idea of what is reasonable (a few percent of the
budget perhaps?), then taking a position like that actually feels like
a responsible thing for a thoughtful charity to do.
-Robert Rohde
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation
The banner can be seen at:
http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:NoticeTemplate/viewtemplate=2009_Craig_Appeal1
-Robert Rohde
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 8:09 PM, Liam Wyatt liamwy...@gmail.com wrote:
care to give some context to your question?
[[witty lama]]
wittylama.com/blog
of the thread (unless I
misunderstood something myself).
Yes, there are other scenarios we have to deal with, and perhaps some
of them could in fact be helped by the development of standardized
permission forms, but I was never suggesting that all of OTRS should
be replaced.
-Robert Rohde
of the article being infringed. So,
for each article you wanted to take down, you would need to find at
least one major contributor to that specific article who was willing
to file the infringement claim. Wikimedia is not generally empowered
to make such claims.
-Robert Rohde
, psychological, and social changes that occur to
individuals over the course of a single human lifetime. Good for
understanding people's wants, needs, and expectations.
-Robert Rohde
PS. Welcome Megan.
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l
to experiment and try some ideas to
see what sticks.
-Robert rohde
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
format, and I hope we aim to replicate that again
this year.
-Robert Rohde
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 9:22 AM, Cary Bass c...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Trying one more time. Seems to have disconnected from my previous message.
Original Message
Subject: Annual Fundraiser starts
at the Foundation-l level perceive
the same trends, and what they think about the balance between
innovation and growth versus simply maintaining and solidifying the
processes and products that we already have.
-Robert Rohde
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Bod Notbod bodnot...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 9:36 PM, Robert Rohde raro...@gmail.com wrote:
At the root, I think that Wikipedia is something of a victim of it's
own success. We've written the largest encyclopedia in history,
become a household
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 4:02 PM, wjhon...@aol.com wrote:
How do you determine the number of views a particular Wikipedia page has
received?
http://stats.grok.se/en/200910/Colorado%20Balloon%20Incident
-Robert Rohde
___
foundation-l mailing list
is probably the
most that it is reasonable to ask of the staff as an ongoing
commitment.
-Robert Rohde
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 10:23 AM, Waerth wae...@asianet.co.th wrote:
Thomas Dalton wrote:
2009/9/30 Waerth wae...@asianet.co.th:
Basically if there is room for two sets of office hours
the
Foundation gets around to endorsing a long-term plan.
It would probably be a good idea for someone to start sorting
proposals be their perceived difficulty and/or need for external
resources (if no one has been already), so that the easy issues could
be separated from the hard ones.
-Robert Rohde
), and yet at the same time it is too small to have
gotten the same level of attention that might go into soliciting a
major foundation for $100k+ grant.
-Robert Rohde
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https
has no rights
that novel, even if the copy of Word I used was completely stolen.
They could sue me for the cost of the lost revenue if I am not using a
properly licensed copy of their software, but they would have no
direct claims over the intellectual works I created using it.
-Robert Rohde
a greater emphasis on effort in determining eligibility for
copyright.
-Robert Rohde
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
by us or by Wikia and similar third parties.
-Robert Rohde
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 8:24 AM, oscar os...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On 9/9/09, Michael Peel em...@mikepeel.net wrote:
On 2 Sep 2009, at 12:35, David Goodman wrote:
There is sufficient missing material in every Wikipedia, sufficient
lack
doesn't really make sense
either.
-Robert Rohde
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
and effort to make it efficient, but the underlying
idea is simple. Locating nearby articles (and geocoded images) could
have a lot of uses.
-Robert Rohde
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https
and users without necessarily
sacrificing the convenience of email for people that prefer that
approach. And of course, people who don't want email interaction
could just use such a web forum as a web forum without enabling any
email features.
-Robert Rohde
is probably a system that is
mostly a forum but has a few email features as well rather than
thinking of it as a gateway primarily designed to be used around
email.
-Robert Rohde
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 9:43 PM, Brion Vibberbr...@wikimedia.org wrote:
snip
Robert, is it possible to share the source for generating the
revert-based stats with other folks who may be interested in pursuing
further work on the subject? Thanks!
Not as a complete stand-alone entity. The
and not in keeping with the
collaborative spirit necessary to run WMF projects.
-Robert Rohde
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
is more likely to be seen than
suggested by the uniform weighting.
-Robert Rohde
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
behaviors. Maybe our concern for ensuring accuracy and addressing
vandalism has grown, but the scale of the underlying problem of
incoming vandalism appears to be more or less constant.
-Robert Rohde
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l
is capable of
walking away from piles of money if it came with too many strings
and conflicts attached.)
-Robert Rohde
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
say
anything sooner.
-Robert Rohde
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
if the vandalism
occurred in more frequently visited parts or not.)
Unfortunately, that's it for now as I need to get back to my thesis /
job search.
-Robert Rohde
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https
in it.
-Robert Rohde
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
vandalism, but there are a significant number of ways to
commit vandalism that nonetheless have nothing to do with impairing
the resulting article's accuracy.
-Robert Rohde
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 4:37 PM, Anthonywikim...@inbox.org wrote:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 7:13 PM, Robert Rohde raro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 3:57 PM, Thomas Daltonthomas.dal...@gmail.com
wrote:
2009/8/20 Anthony wikim...@inbox.org:
I wouldn't suggest looking at the edit
Personally, I think the 2 articles in the Bengali Wikipedia
serving a speaking community of 230 million is an even better example
of failure.
-Robert Rohde
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 8:22 PM, Lars Aronssonl...@aronsson.se wrote:
Andrew Gray wrote:
For those curious as to overall statistics
of such a trademark, i.e. who would own the rights
to the mark.
-Robert Rohde.
PS. Since when did the flower have the name Bob?
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo
be
to think of Knol as the next Geocities.
-Robert Rohde
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 12:34 AM, John Vandenbergjay...@gmail.com wrote:
I had forgotten that my bot gave me a second vote.
Is that a joke?
-Robert Rohde
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https
are titled Senior this-or-that but are still
relatively unimportant.
-Robert Rohde
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
in a
significant amount of interaction with external communities, including
the volunteer developers and the Mediawiki user base. In that
context, I think a description such as head or lead would help
explain his role more clearly than senior does.
Anyway, that's my two cents.
-Robert Rohde
of that. It seems unlikely in most cases.
Besides which, there are many things we can be doing (such as
improving the editing interface and documentation) that should widely
benefit most groups of potential new editors.
-Robert Rohde
___
foundation-l mailing
based on
higher order bytes in the IP address and assuming those are fairly
stable (e.g. using BBB mod 4 where the address is AAA.BBB.CCC.DDD).
Neither approach is foolproof or totally without bias, but one can do
fairly well.
-Robert Rohde
___
foundation
and derivative lies
however tends to be a fuzzy concept not well defined by existing
licenses.
-Robert Rohde
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
to take
similar steps on other wikis.
Hopefully though some form of CentralNotice will be restored shortly.
-Robert Rohde
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 2:07 AM, Philippe
Beaudettepbeaude...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Ladies and Gentlemen,
As you may be aware, there is concern that the sitenotices regarding
way to get a reasonable distribution is to vary which button
people see based on their IP.
-Robert Rohde
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
, our images appear to be 3 or 4 times
larger in linear dimension than the largest view they currently make
available.
-Robert Rohde
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo
.
-Robert Rohde
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
legible and intelligible.
-Robert Rohde
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
were ever
to actually consider this for production use, the parser would
probably need to be patched to allow a more appropriate solution.
-Robert Rohde
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https
.
-Robert Rohde
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
. (For the record, I'm referring to
the earliest history of ParserFunctions. I'm not sure about the
history of #expr and some of the later bits.)
-Robert Rohde
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org
/ if a
corresponding ref_define name=foo.../ref appeared later in the
text.
Personally, my guess is that a system of placement by reference would
make for a more flexible / less confusing approach than trying to
create a system of article hooks and attach infoboxes and the like to
them.
-Robert Rohde
.
So in short, you must comply with US copyright law. You have the option of
further restricting content based on Chinese copyright laws, if your
community so chooses.
-Robert Rohde
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe
by the text.
Simple facts are not eligible for US copyright. Only creative
expression is protected under US case law. One of the more important
Supreme Court cases dealing with this is:
[[Feist Publications v. Rural Telephone Service]]
-Robert Rohde
as potential
copyright violations at this point. This applies specifically to works
published elsewhere under the GFDL. It does not apply if the work was
published elsewhere, but the first GFDL publication was in a WMF site.
-Robert Rohde
by the WMF.
-Robert Rohde
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
contributors
will happily continue editing, and it won't lead to the end of
Wikimedia projects as you suggest, even though some individuals may
choose to stop contributing.
-Robert Rohde
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:53 AM, Jiri Hofmanhofm...@aldebaran.cz wrote:
Hello everybody,
I hope, it is never too
through the current
parser with current templates, current stylesheets, current image
versions, etc., etc. ;-)
-Robert Rohde
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
mainstream format of their choice in return. But such thinking seems
to be pie in the sky at the moment.
-Robert Rohde
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
on distribution
because it was the one I knew off-hand. Since David is talking about
decoding and re-encoding as Ogg, there would be a different set of
fees to consider which I haven't looked at.
-Robert Rohde
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l
that things were handled, but erring on the
side of protecting user privacy is generally a good thing. Now that
you are here discussing the matter, I'd hope a reasonable solution can
be found.
-Robert Rohde
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l
is the proposal to install the AbuseFilter in a global mode,
i.e. rules loaded at Meta that apply everywhere. If that were done
(and there are some arguments about whether it is a good idea), then
it could be used to block these types of URLs from being installed,
even by admins.
-Robert Rohde
on current status.
-Robert Rohde
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
in gibberish.
Anyway, that's the optimistic interpretation.
-Robert Rohde
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 7:38 PM, Brian brian.min...@colorado.edu wrote:
snip
The technical specifications of such a device allow for it to be extremely
cheap.
snip
I think you are underestimating the size of Wikipedia. Even
compressed a snapshot of the English articles with both text and low
cast with relatively little
movement afterwards.
You mileage may vary of course, but the Licensing Update vote had
roughly 60%, 25% and 15% of votes cast during each of its three weeks.
I'd hate to have ignored 40% by stopping after only 1 week.
-Robert Rohde
, but they
shouldn't be kept to the last minute.
-Robert Rohde
[1] http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/licom-l/2009-May/000245.html
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo
1 - 100 of 166 matches
Mail list logo
