LSB today includes non-Linux companies implementing Linux compatibility
(I presume you mean GNU/Linux compatibility.)
for applications this way, and not all will use GNU code. The "Linux" in
LSB is today arguably wrong, but for different reasons to those you
assume.
I take your
Richard:
The "Linux Standards Base" is a plan to develop a specification for
the GNU system. Not, in this case, for the GNU/Linux combination,
just for GNU, because these specs don't concern the kernel, Linux.
It is purely for GNU, but they call GNU "Linux".
If we want to develop specs for th
On Iau, 2006-05-18 at 22:04 -0400, Richard Stallman wrote:
> The "Linux Standards Base" is a plan to develop a specification for
> the GNU system. Not, in this case, for the GNU/Linux combination,
No Richard, it is not. The Linux Standards Base produces specification
documents. The implementation
The "Linux Standards Base" is a plan to develop a specification for
the GNU system. Not, in this case, for the GNU/Linux combination,
just for GNU, because these specs don't concern the kernel, Linux.
It is purely for GNU, but they call GNU "Linux".
If we want to develop specs for the GNU system,
Le jeudi 18 mai 2006 à 09:33 +0200, Vincent Untz a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> There will be a LSB summit in Boston on 1st and 2nd of June (same place
> as Usenix). The details are at: http://freestandards.org/en/LSB_Summit
>
> Is there anyone from GNOME going there, or wanting to
Le jeudi 18 mai 2006 à 09:33 +0200, Vincent Untz a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> There will be a LSB summit in Boston on 1st and 2nd of June (same place
> as Usenix). The details are at: http://freestandards.org/en/LSB_Summit
>
> Is there anyone from GNOME going there, or wanting to
Hi all,
There will be a LSB summit in Boston on 1st and 2nd of June (same place
as Usenix). The details are at: http://freestandards.org/en/LSB_Summit
Is there anyone from GNOME going there, or wanting to go there?
One topic will be the expansion of the LSB Steering committee and the
LSB people
