Re: [f-nsp] Root Shell on FastIron

On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 11:43:49AM +0100, Clement Cavadore wrote: > > Nice trick, thanks for sharing ! Because of the image size, the environment is very limited. But there is a ftp client that we used to copy diagnosis files to the outside. ___

[f-nsp] Root Shell on FastIron

w you can connect via telnet to (additional and special) IP address configured above. No authentication is taking place, root access. Best regards, Franz Georg Köhler ___ foundry-nsp mailing list foundry-nsp@puck.nether.net http://puck.nether.ne

Re: [f-nsp] GEN1 linecards + mgr with 10Gx8-M

On Wed, Mar 06, 2019 at 11:48:49AM +0100, Clement Cavadore wrote: > > 1- Can I use NI-MLX-10Gx8-M with an XMR management card ? > I have read that it could be possible to mix XMR and MLX cards, with > the result that the whole chassis would be "downgraded" to MLX mode, > but last time I tried,

Re: [f-nsp] Intermediary code for FESX

On Mo, Dez 17, 2018 at 10:54:33 +0100, Clement Cavadore wrote: > Hello Franz Georg, > > I was pretty sure you'd be the first to answer my strange question :-)) > > Actually, the release notes does not inform me regarding the > intermediary version. I found an intermediary (sxs04300.bin) on

Re: [f-nsp] Intermediary code for FESX

On So, Dez 16, 2018 at 03:11:02 +0100, Clement Cavadore wrote: > > Anyone has some intermediary versions for me ? Do you already know, what version is needed? V02 seems to be really antique. However it might be the proper version if the switch is being used in a historical context :-)

Re: [f-nsp] Strange SNMP logs/Slowdown

On Di, Sep 18, 2018 at 11:01:21 -0600, Daniel Schmidt wrote: > I've a strange issue - just one of my MLX polls very, very slowly for no > discernible reason. A simple snmpwalk confirms this. Fearing it was > somehow being over polled, I added log statements to my snmp acl. I did > not find

Re: [f-nsp] Layer 2 packet forwarded in hardware(PP)

On Do, Sep 13, 2018 at 08:23:06 -0600, Eldon Koyle wrote: > Have you tried running dm pstat? It can sometimes help identify the type > of traffic causing issues. First run is a throwaway, it shows counts since > the previous run. Thank you, Eldon. I think this is a hint into the right

Re: [f-nsp] Layer 2 packet forwarded in hardware(PP)

On Mo, Sep 10, 2018 at 08:22:19 -0600, Eldon Koyle wrote: > You can enable cpu-protection on the vlan IIRC, I don't remember all the > caveats; definitely look at the manual before enabling. Also with CPU protection enabled on the VLAN I see packets hitting the CPU with "reason: Layer 2 packet

Re: [f-nsp] MLXe code recommendations

On Mi, Sep 12, 2018 at 04:20:46 -0600, Eldon Koyle wrote: > Does anyone have a recommendation for a code version for MLXe? > > The last I saw recommended here was recent 5.8, I'm wondering if it is > worth investigating 6.0 or later yet (or ever). We are currently running v6.0 on all MLX that

Re: [f-nsp] Layer 2 packet forwarded in hardware(PP)

I see on another device traffic hitting the CPU that looks like the same packet hits twice with different reasons. Does anyone have an idea why this happens? I wonder why it is being claffied as multicast only once (and finally it doesn't look like multicast)? [ppcr_rx_packet]: Packet received

Re: [f-nsp] BR-MLX-MR2-X / BR-MLX-100GX2 modules not recognized,

e can > try? Is there any configuration left from another module in that specific slot? In that case, it will not boot up the new module, as its type differs from the configuration. Best regards, Franz Georg Köhler ___ foundry-nsp mailing list foun

[f-nsp] Layer 2 packet forwarded in hardware(PP)

Hello everyone, I currently see increased CPU% one one of our MLXe line cards: #sh cpu lp 15:48:40 GMT+01 Mon Aug 13 2018 SLOT #: LP CPU UTILIZATION in %: in 1 second: in 5 seconds: in 60 seconds: in 300 seconds: 1:6 5 4

Re: [f-nsp] OSPF and BGP flapping when enabling a certain amount of BGP neighbors

On Do, Jun 28, 2018 at 10:15:14 +0200, Frank Menzel wrote: > > interface ethernet 1/1 > no ip redirect You usually want to set no icmp redirects on global level. Best regards, Franz Georg Köhler ___ foundry-nsp mailing list fo

Re: [f-nsp] Memory leak on ICX7450

On Do, Feb 08, 2018 at 01:34:58 +0100, Franz Georg Köhler <li...@openunix.de> wrote: > On Mi, Dez 13, 2017 at 09:31:56 +, Tim Warnock <tim...@timoid.org> wrote: > > I used to test 10,000 “show run” and 20 “show techs”, along side 10,000 > > full SNMP “walks”. Th

Re: [f-nsp] FCX and target path 8.0.10m (and an aside)

problem here. You can check with dm ipv4 hw-route / dm ipv4 hw-arp if HW entries are programmed correctly while the host is unreachable. Do you have independent management connectivity to the FCX to check the status while it stops routing? Best regards, Franz Georg Köhler

Re: [f-nsp] Memory leak on ICX7450

onf", not "sh run", but is pretty easy to replicate with the right command. Connection type (ssh/console) doesn't matter. This has been reported to Ruckus and is going to be fixed in 08061c coming end of March. Not sure if this is present in 08040 and 08060. B

Re: [f-nsp] Memory leak on ICX7450

On Mi, Dez 13, 2017 at 09:48:46 +0100, Clement Cavadore wrote: > Hello, > > I have found a probable memory leak on ICX7450 code version SPR08061a > (and b). Did you try to open a case? ICX is ruckus now: https://support.ruckuswireless.com/cases Best regards, Franz

Re: [f-nsp] Brocade RX-4 to Cisco - Light but no link

On Mi, Sep 06, 2017 at 07:53:57 +, Derek Maxwell wrote: > > We have a Brocade/Foundry RX-4 with (2) 24 port fiber cards > (RX-BI-24F) and (2) 24 port copper cards (RX-BI-24C). One of our > transit providers is NTT, with whom we have a single GigE circuit >

[f-nsp] Management VRF and management port on ICX

to be part of the VRF. Secondly, the system will only send out management packets on loopback1, not on the management port. How do you address those problems? Best regards, Franz Georg Köhler ___ foundry-nsp mailing list foundry-nsp@puck.nethe

Re: [f-nsp] Trunk / LAG and spanning-tree costs

different link speeds. The same behavior also holds TRUE for RSTP deployments. Best regards, Franz Georg Köhler ___ foundry-nsp mailing list foundry-nsp@puck.nether.net http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp

Re: [f-nsp] Transceiver "not supported" on ICX7750 in Breakout-Mode

and use one of the remaining 40G interfaces for break out. However, this is currently unsupported as you cannot enable stacking mode as long as one of the ports in configured in breakout mode. Best regards, Franz Georg Köhler ___ foundry-nsp mailing

Re: [f-nsp] Transceiver "not supported" on ICX7750 in Breakout-Mode

? Is there such a thing like hardware support for breakout cables? Until now, I was under the impression that a 40G port is just an aggregated 4x10G port and the switch just needs to deactivate the aggregation in order to break out? Am I wrong? Best regards, Franz Georg Köhler

[f-nsp] Transceiver "not supported" on ICX7750 in Breakout-Mode

/2/6:4: Type : 40GE-SR4 100m (QSFP+) Best regards, Franz Georg Köhler ___ foundry-nsp mailing list foundry-nsp@puck.nether.net http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp

Re: [f-nsp] Double-switched (looped) traffic on Netiron MLX

On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 09:31:30AM +0100, Franz Georg Köhler wrote: > On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 10:00:56PM +0100, "Rolf Hanßen" wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I have no solution for that beside using vpls/vll-local. I don't think >> there is one. > > Interesting

Re: [f-nsp] Double-switched (looped) traffic on Netiron MLX

ing on the same interface). As most systems ignore ICMP redirects anyway, there is no benefit in keeping the default option enabled and I strongly recommend to always disable it. Best regards, Franz Georg Köhler ___ foundry-nsp mailing list foundry-nsp@

[f-nsp] Double-switched (looped) traffic on Netiron MLX

| | +---+---+ | | | | | firewall | +--+ | +---+ Best regards, Franz Georg Köhler ___ foundry-nsp mailing list foundry-nsp@puck.nether.net http://puck.nether.net/mailman

Re: [f-nsp] NetIron 5.9 feedbacks

LAG without bringing down the LAG. :-) I do not see SFM temperatures on show chassis any more with 5.8 and 5.9, does anybode alse see this phenomenon? Best regards, Franz Georg Köhler ___ foundry-nsp mailing list foundry-nsp@puck.nether.net http

Re: [f-nsp] Routes being ignored with MLX4

Hello, this could be bogon filtering. You can try to disable it and afterwards reinstall thge route manually: no ip martian filtering-on Best regards, Franz Georg Köhler Am 01.10.14 um 21:19 schrieb José Santos: Hi, We are new to Brocade and we are experiencing an unexpected behavihor

Re: [f-nsp] management vrf on mangement port

Hello, yes, you are right, this is an MLXe with V5.6.0b. Unfortunately, I did not have IPV4 connectivity at this time to test this. But as I never had configured a management VRF, I was curious if there was some configuration error in my config. Best regards, Franz Georg Köhler

[f-nsp] management vrf on mangement port

, basic config which should be OK to my understanding? vrf management rd 29066:01 address-family ipv6 ipv6 route ::/0 gw int man 1 vrf forwarding management ipv6 addr ip There is also no change if I set management-vrf management or not. Best regards, Franz Georg Köhler

Re: [f-nsp] Health Monitoring: TM Egress data errors detected

: 1584 TDM_A Lost Pkt Count: 0 TDM_B Lost Pkt Count: 0 Best regards, Franz Georg Köhler ___ foundry-nsp mailing list foundry-nsp@puck.nether.net http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp

Re: [f-nsp] Health Monitoring: TM Egress data errors detected

for Discard: 0 (Disable)] Prg EGQ EnQue Pkt Count: 279637915732 Prg EGQ EnQue Byte Count: 49565697750048 Prg EGQ Discard Pkt Count:0 Prg EGQ Discard Byte Count: 0 Best regards, Franz Georg Köhler

[f-nsp] Health Monitoring: TM Egress data errors detected

data errors detected on LP 1/TM 0 Does anybody know if this is a hardware or software related problem? Best regards, Franz Georg Köhler ___ foundry-nsp mailing list foundry-nsp@puck.nether.net http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp

Re: [f-nsp] Netiron 5.4

Am 10.10.12 19:50, schrieb Darren O'Connor: Anyone running it yet? I see it's been released. I'm using it and it is working. Manifest upgrade did not upgrade boot images on line cards. I did this manually afterwards. I'm particularly keen for the routing over VPLS feature. I do not use

[f-nsp] Copying software to secondary flash deletes primary flash's content?

On Netiron MLX, my existing IronWare Software gets deleted while I want to install a backup in the secondary flash: #show flash Active Management Module (Top Slot) Code Flash - Type MT28F128J3, Size 32 MB o IronWare Image

Re: [f-nsp] Copying software to secondary flash deletes primary flash's content?

Hello, I read this, but both images fit onto the management module. However, I removed the secondary LP image since I thought it is more valuable to have a secondary management ironware to boot from in emergency cases than a secondary lp image (which could be downloaded from tftp anyway, as long

[f-nsp] RPF filtering combined with link aggregation/etherchannel

Dis No No Ope 2/411 100 Yes L Agg Syn Col Dis No No Ope Best regards, Franz Georg Köhler ___ foundry-nsp mailing list foundry-nsp@puck.nether.net http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp

Re: [f-nsp] Current Total Free Memory [...] is below 5 percent of Installed Memory.

%(used) :SNet 11: 16(size), 16(free), 00.00%(used) Do I have to worry about a totally used SNet? Best regards, Franz Georg Köhler ___ foundry-nsp mailing list foundry-nsp@puck.nether.net http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo

Re: [f-nsp] Current Total Free Memory [...] is below 5 percent of Installed Memory.

) Best regards, Franz Georg Köhler ___ foundry-nsp mailing list foundry-nsp@puck.nether.net http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp

Re: [f-nsp] Current Total Free Memory [...] is below 5 percent of Installed Memory.

? Best regards, Franz Georg Köhler ___ foundry-nsp mailing list foundry-nsp@puck.nether.net http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp

Re: [f-nsp] Current Total Free Memory [...] is below 5 percent of Installed Memory.

! NetIron MLX LP SL 1: Total SDRAM : 536870912 bytes Available Memory:22589440 bytes Available Memory (%): 4 percent Are you sure that message reflects TCAM and not general DRAM? No, this message is not about CAM but total line card memory. Best regards, Franz Georg

[f-nsp] Current Total Free Memory [...] is below 5 percent of Installed Memory.

Hello, I am currently seeing a lot of those messages on a MLX: WARN: Current Total Free Memory (22589440) on LP 1 is below 5 percent of Installed Memory. Since the RAM usage seems to remain stable at 96% on this line card, I wonder if: - it is generally considered to be save to run the LP

Re: [f-nsp] MLX-XMR compatibility

On Di, Jun 21, 2011 at 10:52:34 +0200, Rens r...@autempspourmoi.be wrote: Small question regarding the modules interchangeability between MLX-XMR? Can a NI-MLX-1Gx20-SFP 20-port 1GbE-100FX Module be used in a XMR? Can a NI-XMR-1Gx20-SFP 20-port 1GbE/100FX Module be used in a MLX?