>Any contribution is good :-)
>
>Currently, there is a soundex() algorithm in strutils; the soundex algorithm
>is geared towards the english language. Having one for the portugese language
>is definitely good. It would even be better if we could somehow unite the
>algorithms witha suitable para
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
>
>
>Did it go through the mailing list already? I guess because it contains
>an attachement it is held for approval.
>
>
>
Yes, i've already seen it in the list. Anyway, the link to the units is here
http://www.bandarra.org/pascal/stringcomparison/
begin:vcard
fn;quote
Hi
are you interested in FMTBcd unit for FPC ?
I would appreciate information needed for clean implementation.
Page used for collecting information is:
http://www.freepascal.org/wiki/index.php/BcdUnit
At this moment most valuable are test cases for different functions.
Also more explanation abo
L505 wrote:
...
> But compiled with delphi compiler, or freepascal? I wonder if they have a
> specific restriction where you can only compile the code on their compilers...
> Not that I know of but.. I thought maybe you guys had come across something
> like
> that
The System.pas unit is special.
|
| > Another question: if someone already owns Delphi, they could compile any
source code
| > from their Delphi CD with freepascal? Is this legal?
|
| Compilation for private use is legal. Borland disallows to distribute
| their library source code, also in compiled (object) form unless as part
|
L505 wrote:
> | | Do not look at delphi copyrighted source, but get info from public sources
> | | like helpfiles for download on Borlands FTP etc.
> | |
> | | This should be enough to reconstruct a rough interface, details will then
> | | later be found by testing real delphi code.
> | |
> |
> |
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 12:41:30AM +0200, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 9 Jun 2005, L505 wrote:
>
> > |
> > | | Do not look at delphi copyrighted source, but get info from public
> > sources
> > | | like helpfiles for download on Borlands FTP etc.
> > | |
> > | | This should be enoug
On Thu, 9 Jun 2005, L505 wrote:
> |
> | | Do not look at delphi copyrighted source, but get info from public sources
> | | like helpfiles for download on Borlands FTP etc.
> | |
> | | This should be enough to reconstruct a rough interface, details will then
> | | later be found by testing real d
|
| | Do not look at delphi copyrighted source, but get info from public sources
| | like helpfiles for download on Borlands FTP etc.
| |
| | This should be enough to reconstruct a rough interface, details will then
| | later be found by testing real delphi code.
| |
|
| I was just wondering, are t
| Do not look at delphi copyrighted source, but get info from public sources
| like helpfiles for download on Borlands FTP etc.
|
| This should be enough to reconstruct a rough interface, details will then
| later be found by testing real delphi code.
|
I was just wondering, are there any source
On Thu, 9 Jun 2005, André Cipriani Bandarra wrote:
> Well..
> I had spent a lot of time thinking about how to contribute to FPC. I
> thought about contributing with a string phonetizer algoritm i made, but
> its works only for the portuguese language, so i thought i wouldnt be
> much usefull
André Cipriani Bandarra wrote:
> Well..
> I had spent a lot of time thinking about how to contribute to FPC. I
> thought about contributing with a string phonetizer algoritm i made, but
> its works only for the portuguese language, so i thought i wouldnt be
> much usefull for most of the FPC co
Well..
I had spent a lot of time thinking about how to contribute to FPC. I
thought about contributing with a string phonetizer algoritm i made, but
its works only for the portuguese language, so i thought i wouldnt be
much usefull for most of the FPC community.
Some days ago i contributed
> >
> > This should be enough to reconstruct a rough interface, details will then
> > later be found by testing real delphi code.
>
> The FreeCLX contains also an implementation though it's GPL while FPC
> libraries
> are modified LGPL.
This is only interesting for Kylix licensees, and products
Marco van de Voort wrote:
>>>On Fri, 3 Jun 2005, Kornel Kisielewicz wrote:
>>>
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
>- write a bcd classes
BCD?
>>>
>>>Binary Coded Decimal. We urgently need a bcdfmt unit as in delphi.
>>
>>[...]
>>
>>I did not find any usable info about the bcdfmt.
>
>
>
> > On Fri, 3 Jun 2005, Kornel Kisielewicz wrote:
> >> Florian Klaempfl wrote:
> >>> - write a bcd classes
> >> BCD?
> > Binary Coded Decimal. We urgently need a bcdfmt unit as in delphi.
> [...]
>
> I did not find any usable info about the bcdfmt.
Searching for "Delphi precision tbcd" on google
On Jun 3, 2005, at 07:03, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Fri, 3 Jun 2005, Kornel Kisielewicz wrote:
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
- write a bcd classes
BCD?
Binary Coded Decimal. We urgently need a bcdfmt unit as in delphi.
[...]
Hi
I did not find any usable info about the bcdfmt.
What is the req
L505 wrote:
I will submit a crumby KOL hello world zip asap. (next goal is to try an MCK app
working, and a linux app working, but I"m not sure how far linux is supported
with
kol)
Listen, 26KB for complete a hello world windows GUI program is not bad at all.
Where I see a big problem is lazaru
Some of the incompatibilities first need to be brought about through
experimentation.
So start figuring out what -specific- delphi units that you actually need to get
working now. If you have a specific unit or source code that needs to be
working -today-, then at least you can submit the exact in
Some of the incompatibilities first need to be brought about through
experimentation.
So start figuring out what -specific- delphi units that you actually need to get
working now. If you have a specific unit or source code that needs to be
working -today-, then at least you can submit the exact in
L505 wrote:
> | Why not both? Delphi is windows-only, so even if FPC became 100%
> | compatible with D7, the libraries already available for Delphi are
> | usually windows specific, and FPC libraries are cross-platform.
>
> And we all know they are already doing just that. What is needed is more
> Why not both? Delphi is windows-only, so even if FPC became 100% compatible
> with D7, the libraries already available for Delphi are usually windows
> specific, and FPC libraries are cross-platform.
I believe you know about Kylix, which is Delphi clone on linux. Delphi IDE is
windows only, a
- Original Message -
From: "Nikolay Nikolov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "FPC developers' list"
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 1:16 AM
Subject: Re: [fpc-devel] Extend the libraries people!
| Bisma Jayadi wrote:
|
| >Object pascal is a mature language. Som
Bisma Jayadi wrote:
Object pascal is a mature language. Some languages even adopt the concept, such
as C# or Java, with different syntaxes and styles. Do not listen to people who
said pascal is a toy language, they just don't know what they're talking about.
Then, if we are talking about the
Object pascal is a mature language. Some languages even adopt the concept, such
as C# or Java, with different syntaxes and styles. Do not listen to people who
said pascal is a toy language, they just don't know what they're talking about.
Then, if we are talking about the object pascal compilers
Neat, I haven't come across these yet.
If you -have- got some working under FPC you should upload them to "contributed
units"
section. Because if other people convert the units which have already been done
by
someone else, we would be doing double work ;-) Plus it gets code into a central
reposi
On Fri, 03 Jun 2005 01:26:34 -0400, you wrote:
>> What makes python interesting are the many classes it offers by default
>> to perform standard tasks, especially in the text treatment department;
>> regular expression stuff etc.
>>
>> The same goes for most languages; Mostly it's not the language
| Kornel Kisielewicz wrote:
|
| > Angelo Bertolli wrote:
| >
| >>> What makes python interesting are the many classes it offers by default
| >>> to perform standard tasks, especially in the text treatment department;
| >>> regular expression stuff etc.
There's already a completely working rege
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Fri, 3 Jun 2005, Vincent Snijders wrote:
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Michael, maybe you can write a short description (wiki?) how to create
documentation for units not yet documented.
Maybe this page can help too:
http://lazarus-ccr.sourceforge.net/kb/index.php/L
On Fri, 3 Jun 2005, Vincent Snijders wrote:
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Fri, 3 Jun 2005, Kornel Kisielewicz wrote:
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
- write docs for the already existing packages
You mean that writing a fpcdoc for the opengl headers for example
wo
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Fri, 3 Jun 2005, Kornel Kisielewicz wrote:
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
- write docs for the already existing packages
You mean that writing a fpcdoc for the opengl headers for example
would be useful for somebody? Myself, I always was
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 3 Jun 2005, Kornel Kisielewicz wrote:
>
>>
>> Florian Klaempfl wrote:
>>
>>> - write docs for the already existing packages
>>>
>> You mean that writing a fpcdoc for the opengl headers for example
>> would be useful for somebody? Myself, I always was unc
On Fri, 3 Jun 2005, Kornel Kisielewicz wrote:
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
- write docs for the already existing packages
You mean that writing a fpcdoc for the opengl headers for example would be
useful for somebody? Myself, I always was uncontent with the fact that there
was no opengl secti
Kornel Kisielewicz wrote:
>
> Florian Klaempfl wrote:
>
>> - write docs for the already existing packages
>>
>>
> You mean that writing a fpcdoc for the opengl headers for example would
> be useful for somebody? Myself, I always was uncontent with the fact
> that there was no opengl section in
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
- write docs for the already existing packages
You mean that writing a fpcdoc for the opengl headers for example would
be useful for somebody? Myself, I always was uncontent with the fact
that there was no opengl section in the rtl docs...
--
At your service,
Kor
On Fri, 3 Jun 2005, Kornel Kisielewicz wrote:
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Kornel Kisielewicz wrote:
Okay, agreed. But what is there that can be done? I mean, yes -- there
are many things that can be done by Pascal guru's, but is there anything
to be done by a typical Pascal programmer? (withou
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Kornel Kisielewicz wrote:
Okay, agreed. But what is there that can be done? I mean, yes -- there
are many things that can be done by Pascal guru's, but is there anything
to be done by a typical Pascal programmer? (without the knowledge of
similar C libraries) I'm a Fr
Kornel Kisielewicz wrote:
> Angelo Bertolli wrote:
>
>>> What makes python interesting are the many classes it offers by default
>>> to perform standard tasks, especially in the text treatment department;
>>> regular expression stuff etc.
>>>
>>> The same goes for most languages; Mostly it's not
Angelo Bertolli wrote:
What makes python interesting are the many classes it offers by default
to perform standard tasks, especially in the text treatment department;
regular expression stuff etc.
The same goes for most languages; Mostly it's not the language syntax
that determines the producti
What makes python interesting are the many classes it offers by default
to perform standard tasks, especially in the text treatment department;
regular expression stuff etc.
The same goes for most languages; Mostly it's not the language syntax
that determines the productivity factor; it's the n
40 matches
Mail list logo
