On 10 Nov 2009, at 08:35, dmitry boyarintsev wrote:
There're 2 ways to define indirect symbol by the compiler:
tai_const with type aitconst_indirect_symbol
or
tai_directive with asd_indirect_symbol
either way produces identical assembler output:
.indirect_symbol %symbol_name
So i'm
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 3:50 PM, Jonas Maebe jonas.ma...@elis.ugent.be wrote:
I think simply that I forgot that one way was already available when I added
the other way :) It's fine to remove either one.
hmm... I'll try to make the patch.
thanks,
dmitry
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 3:53 PM, dmitry boyarintsev
skalogryz.li...@gmail.com wrote:
hmm... I'll try to make the patch.
here's the one: http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=15050
Removing tai_const with indirect_symbol doesn't seem to harm the
generated asm code at all, at least for i386
Hello Jonas,
There're 2 ways to define indirect symbol by the compiler:
tai_const with type aitconst_indirect_symbol
or
tai_directive with asd_indirect_symbol
either way produces identical assembler output:
.indirect_symbol %symbol_name
So i'm wondering, what was the reason to separate them
