Hi,
09.06.2012 5:27, Fuxin Zhang:
I get a copy from my colleague for N32 ABI, no N64 found yet.See
http://www.lemote.com/upfiles/mips-abi-n32.pdf. I put it here because no
confidential sign in the document. But I am not sure whether it comes from
MIPS as a material to licensee. Will check later.
Am 08.06.2012 14:54, schrieb microc...@zoho.com:
On Fri, 8 Jun 2012 17:15:51 +0800 (CST)
Fuxin Zhang zhan...@lemote.com wrote:
I made a start at trying to get assembler and backend info into the
Wiki, my intention was to at least have URLs for the various ABIs. I
rather ground to a halt
Florian Klämpfl wrote:
Am 08.06.2012 14:54, schrieb microc...@zoho.com:
On Fri, 8 Jun 2012 17:15:51 +0800 (CST)
Fuxin Zhang zhan...@lemote.com wrote:
I made a start at trying to get assembler and backend info into the
Wiki, my intention was to at least have URLs for the various ABIs. I
rather
Am 09.06.2012 16:44, schrieb Mark Morgan Lloyd:
Florian Klämpfl wrote:
Am 08.06.2012 14:54, schrieb microc...@zoho.com:
On Fri, 8 Jun 2012 17:15:51 +0800 (CST)
Fuxin Zhang zhan...@lemote.com wrote:
I made a start at trying to get assembler and backend info into the
Wiki, my intention was to
On Sat, 9 Jun 2012 09:27:30 +0800 (CST)
Fuxin Zhang zhan...@lemote.com wrote:
Fuxin, is there a formal 64 bit ABI from MIPS Inc.? I think you said
earlier the Linux 64 bit ABI is not exactly stable, but there are a few
other OS running on 64 bit MIPS (OpenBSD and FreeBSD and NetBSD, as
microc...@zoho.com wrote:
On Sat, 9 Jun 2012 09:27:30 +0800 (CST)
Fuxin Zhang zhan...@lemote.com wrote:
Fuxin, is there a formal 64 bit ABI from MIPS Inc.? I think you said
earlier the Linux 64 bit ABI is not exactly stable, but there are a few
other OS running on 64 bit MIPS (OpenBSD and
Please keep copyright in mind when adding new stuff!
I have removed the link in the wiki and the files from lemote web. Sorry
for the thinkless action.
Opening the ABI documents should be a good thing to help its eco-system,
if I have chance I will try to pasuade mips.
Absolutely. However I
On Sat, 09 Jun 2012 20:52:01 +
Mark Morgan Lloyd markmll.fpc-de...@telemetry.co.uk wrote:
microc...@zoho.com wrote:
On Sat, 9 Jun 2012 09:27:30 +0800 (CST)
Fuxin Zhang zhan...@lemote.com wrote:
Fuxin, is there a formal 64 bit ABI from MIPS Inc.? I think you said
earlier the Linux
On Sun, 10 Jun 2012 08:18:36 +0800 (CST)
Fuxin Zhang zhan...@lemote.com wrote:
Please keep copyright in mind when adding new stuff!
I have removed the link in the wiki and the files from lemote web. Sorry
for the thinkless action.
Opening the ABI documents should be a good thing to help
-Message d'origine-
De : fpc-devel-boun...@lists.freepascal.org [mailto:fpc-devel-
boun...@lists.freepascal.org] De la part de Fuxin Zhang
Envoyé : vendredi 8 juin 2012 02:07
À : Jonas Maebe
Cc : FPC developers' list
Objet : Re: [fpc-devel] progress of freepascal for mips
Pierre Free Pascal wrote:
It is not closely following a specific abi, but for parameters
it works like this:
Up to 6 parameters are passed in registers $r4 to $r9,
others on the stack starting at offset 24 (=6*4).
(I had to adapt the 6 parameter very of linux/mips/syscall.inc
in order to
Hi Fuxin,
I committed to trunk your changes together with
a few changes to cpupara that allow me to generate
a compiler (not yet operational, but its going forward).
Florian asked be to commit it.
Thank you for your work, then I will start based on the trunk.
It is not closely
I made a start at trying to get assembler and backend info into the
Wiki, my intention was to at least have URLs for the various ABIs. I
rather ground to a halt after getting examples of the assembler format
together for most targets, if anybody could contribute ABI stuff it
would be much
On Fri, 8 Jun 2012 17:15:51 +0800 (CST)
Fuxin Zhang zhan...@lemote.com wrote:
I made a start at trying to get assembler and backend info into the
Wiki, my intention was to at least have URLs for the various ABIs. I
rather ground to a halt after getting examples of the assembler format
microc...@zoho.com wrote:
On Fri, 8 Jun 2012 17:15:51 +0800 (CST)
Fuxin Zhang zhan...@lemote.com wrote:
I made a start at trying to get assembler and backend info into the
Wiki, my intention was to at least have URLs for the various ABIs. I
rather ground to a halt after getting examples of the
On Fri, 08 Jun 2012 13:32:18 +
Mark Morgan Lloyd markmll.fpc-de...@telemetry.co.uk wrote:
microc...@zoho.com wrote:
On Fri, 8 Jun 2012 17:15:51 +0800 (CST)
Fuxin Zhang zhan...@lemote.com wrote:
I made a start at trying to get assembler and backend info into the
Wiki, my intention
Fuxin, is there a formal 64 bit ABI from MIPS Inc.? I think you said
earlier the Linux 64 bit ABI is not exactly stable, but there are a few
other OS running on 64 bit MIPS (OpenBSD and FreeBSD and NetBSD, as far as
I know). If MIPS or some other standards body has documented the 64 bit
Fuxin, is there a formal 64 bit ABI from MIPS Inc.? I think you said
earlier the Linux 64 bit ABI is not exactly stable, but there are a few
other OS running on 64 bit MIPS (OpenBSD and FreeBSD and NetBSD, as far
as
I know). If MIPS or some other standards body has documented the 64 bit
Fuxin Zhang wrote on Sat, 02 Jun 2012:
With the attached patch (against revision 21440), most of the tests
can
now pass, for example, the test directory has only the following
failinglist:
When committing/submitting patches in the future, please split them up
into smaller independent
Fuxin Zhang wrote on Sat, 02 Jun 2012:
With the attached patch (against revision 21440), most of the tests can
now pass, for example, the test directory has only the following
failinglist:
When committing/submitting patches in the future, please split them up
into smaller independent
Am 05.06.2012 02:43, schrieb Leonardo M. Ramé:
From: Jonas Maebejonas.ma...@elis.ugent.be
To: Leonardo M. Ramémartinr...@yahoo.com; FPC developers'
listfpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
Sent: Monday, June 4, 2012 7:19 PM
Subject: Re: [fpc-devel] progress
microcode wrote on Tue, 05 Jun 2012:
The best OS is the one IBM made for it, AIX which is a POSIX UNIX with
IBM extensions (and great doc!).
It's true that IBM has great documentation. But AIX has quite a few
quirks compared to other Unices, even commercial/traditional big iron
ones like
microc...@zoho.com wrote:
On Mon, 4 Jun 2012 14:56:06 -0700 (PDT)
Leonardo M. Ramé martinr...@yahoo.com wrote:
You are right, the machine
(http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/power/hardware/560/specs.html) doesn't
have a MIPS processor, but an IBM's Power6.
BTW, does anyone know which Linux
From: Mark Morgan Lloyd markmll.fpc-de...@telemetry.co.uk
To: fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
Sent: Tuesday, June 5, 2012 6:38 AM
Subject: Re: [fpc-devel] progress of freepascal for mips
microc...@zoho.com wrote:
On Mon, 4 Jun 2012 14:56:06 -0700 (PDT
://leonardorame.blogspot.com
From: microc...@zoho.com microc...@zoho.com
To: fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
Sent: Saturday, June 2, 2012 3:58 PM
Subject: Re: [fpc-devel] progress of freepascal for mips
On Sat, 2 Jun 2012 07:04:24 -0700 (PDT)
Leonardo M. Ramé martinr...@yahoo.com wrote
On 04 Jun 2012, at 23:56, Leonardo M. Ramé wrote:
You are right, the machine
(http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/power/hardware/560/specs.html) doesn't have a
MIPS processor, but an IBM's Power6.
BTW, does anyone know which Linux distribution runs on that machine?
From: Jonas Maebe jonas.ma...@elis.ugent.be
To: Leonardo M. Ramé martinr...@yahoo.com; FPC developers' list
fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
Sent: Monday, June 4, 2012 7:19 PM
Subject: Re: [fpc-devel] progress of freepascal for mips
On 04 Jun 2012, at 23:56
Yes, both under AIX and under Linux (either the ppc32 or the ppc64
version of FPC).
#160;
That means that there is a native version of FPC or an emulated x86
version?
Judging from the source, it should be a native version.
Leonardo M. Ram�
http://leonardorame.blogspot.com
On Mon, 4 Jun 2012 14:56:06 -0700 (PDT)
Leonardo M. Ramé martinr...@yahoo.com wrote:
You are right, the machine
(http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/power/hardware/560/specs.html) doesn't
have a MIPS processor, but an IBM's Power6.
BTW, does anyone know which Linux distribution runs on that
From mar...@stack.nl Sun Jun 3 08:34:51 2012
In our previous episode, microc...@zoho.com said:
AFAIK, as far as Windows, nothing but Windows CE (not XP, 7, Vista etc)
runs on MIPS
Afaik NT up to and including 4.0 ran on MIPS (r3000/4000). After 4.0
architectures were severely cut.
In our previous episode, Fuxin Zhang said:
4, rtl/linux/{ostypes.inc, linux.pp, oldlinux.pp}, macro definitions
for mips: MAP_xxx
Oldlinux is deprecated, and not even compiled by default anymore. Please
consider it frozen, and please don't add anything to it. (it never has been
truly
From: Fuxin Zhang zhan...@lemote.com
To: FPC developers' list fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
Sent: Friday, June 1, 2012 9:16 PM
Subject: [fpc-devel] progress of freepascal for mips
hi everybody,
With the attached patch (against revision 21440), most
On Sat, 2 Jun 2012 07:04:24 -0700 (PDT)
Leonardo M. Ramé martinr...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi, while this interesting discussion about fpc for Linux/MIPS is
evolving, we've received an IBM Mips server from a customer (I don't know
the model yet) to try to install an hypervisor.
Sorry if this
In our previous episode, microc...@zoho.com said:
AFAIK, as far as Windows, nothing but Windows CE (not XP, 7, Vista etc) runs
on MIPS
Afaik NT up to and including 4.0 ran on MIPS (r3000/4000). After 4.0
architectures were severely cut.
NT3.51 also ran SPARC.
microc...@zoho.com wrote:
I am near certain IBM doesn't make any MIPS hardware at all and never has
in their history. In the past they've made all sorts of odd things but at
the moment all they make is Intel and POWER servers, as far as servers go.
MIPS in IBM-speak is millions of instructions
35 matches
Mail list logo
