Am 18.10.2020 um 08:56 schrieb J. Gareth Moreton via fpc-devel:
Hi everyone,
I've started to look at developing FPC on the Raspberry Pi again, but
I've run into a snag.
The unmodified trunk does not build - it fails when building system.pp
at the ppc1 stage:
math.inc(57,7) Error: Assembler
Am 18.10.2020 um 08:56 schrieb J. Gareth Moreton via fpc-devel:
Hi everyone,
I've started to look at developing FPC on the Raspberry Pi again, but
I've run into a snag.
The unmodified trunk does not build - it fails when building system.pp
at the ppc1 stage:
math.inc(57,7) Error: Assembler
Am 18.10.20 um 08:56 schrieb J. Gareth Moreton via fpc-devel:
(On another note, a number of AArch64 opcodes are missing, notably ADDS
(add and set flags) and similar instructions -
This is done by opcode prefixes.
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-dev
Ah, thanks Florian.
Gareth aka. Kit
On 18/10/2020 10:01, Florian Klämpfl via fpc-devel wrote:
Am 18.10.20 um 08:56 schrieb J. Gareth Moreton via fpc-devel:
(On another note, a number of AArch64 opcodes are missing, notably
ADDS (add and set flags) and similar instructions -
This is done b
Hi Sven - thanks for the quick check. I'm out of the house currently so
I can't try it out immediately, but I'll try it out later this evening.
By the way, both my source and target are aarch64-linux (I'm using the
prototype aarch64 build of the Raspberry Pi OS, athough I have an SD
card with
Am 18.10.2020 um 11:15 schrieb J. Gareth Moreton:
Hi Sven - thanks for the quick check. I'm out of the house currently
so I can't try it out immediately, but I'll try it out later this
evening. By the way, both my source and target are aarch64-linux (I'm
using the prototype aarch64 build of t
I can't remember for sure - it might have been 3.0.4, so I'm probably
asking for trouble now. When I get back later I'll check for sure and
try a few things and get back to you. At least it's confirmed that it
actually did not compile!
For the curious, I'm looking to implement the optimisati
I've just seen the change you've made Sven (just looking it via diff,
not actually testing the code)... do the standard Pascal comments
seriously cause a problem in AArch64 assembly blocks? Do the braces
have an actual syntactic use on that platform? That seems like an
incredibly awkward desi
On 18/10/2020 13:34, J. Gareth Moreton via fpc-devel wrote:
> I've just seen the change you've made Sven (just looking it via diff,
> not actually testing the code)... do the standard Pascal comments
> seriously cause a problem in AArch64 assembly blocks? Do the braces
> have an actual syntactic u
Aah, I see - thanks Jonas. That's a little awkward - presumably we
can't change it to round brackets instead since that's a bit of a clash
that can't easily be remedied, especially as such comments are fine in
other inline assembly languages.
Gareth aka. Kit
On 18/10/2020 14:10, Jonas Maebe
Am 18.10.2020 um 15:15 schrieb J. Gareth Moreton via fpc-devel:
Aah, I see - thanks Jonas. That's a little awkward - presumably we
can't change it to round brackets instead since that's a bit of a
clash that can't easily be remedied, especially as such comments are
fine in other inline assembl
That's a point, yeah. It's just difficult because, on Lazarus for
example, anything inside braces is coloured as if it were a comment in
an asm block. Changing this so it appears the same colour as the rest
of the assembly code when on Arm platforms would help reduce the
confusion, although t
On 14/10/2020 17:45, Curtis Hamilton via fpc-devel wrote:
> I’ve been able to create a cross compiler using the guidance and some
> additional information. But I’ve been unable to create the proper FPC
> startup code (prt0.as) needed.
>
> Any help would be appreciated.
I believe these files are
Op 2020-10-18 om 23:03 schreef Jonas Maebe via fpc-devel:
I’ve been able to create a cross compiler using the guidance and some
additional information. But I’ve been unable to create the proper FPC
startup code (prt0.as) needed.
Any help would be appreciated.
I believe these files are gener
14 matches
Mail list logo
