Am 29.04.2023 um 19:48 schrieb geneb via fpc-other:
On Sat, 29 Apr 2023, Bernd Oppolzer via fpc-other wrote:
This may be slightly off-topic, but I can tell you some facts about
my Stanford Pascal compiler,
which runs
- native on z Mainframe machines (which may count as a RISC machine,
On Sat, 29 Apr 2023, Bernd Oppolzer via fpc-other wrote:
This may be slightly off-topic, but I can tell you some facts about my
Stanford Pascal compiler,
which runs
- native on z Mainframe machines (which may count as a RISC machine,
given the instruction set used)
- emulated by Hercules,
On the same machine:
PASCAL1 compiled with Stanford Pascal, running on the Hercules emulator:
pp pascal1
EXEC PASCAL PASCAL1
STATE PASCAL1 PASCAL A
EXEC PASCOMP PASCAL1
STANFORD PASCAL COMPILER, OPPOLZER VERSION OF 2023.03
Compiler Summary
No Errors, no
This may be slightly off-topic, but I can tell you some facts about my
Stanford Pascal compiler,
which runs
- native on z Mainframe machines (which may count as a RISC machine,
given the instruction set used)
- emulated by Hercules, which is a emulator of z Mainframes
- by emulating P-Code,
Hello everybody,
Please, note that this thread (already very long) will become moderated now and
no further posts will be let through unless I or some other list moderator
believe that there"s a very good reason for it.
Thanks for your understanding
Tomas
(one of FPC mailing list moderators)
On 29/04/2023 12:24, Jacob Kroon via fpc-other wrote:
I find it very odd the way you write above, and that you insist on
defending Nikolay/Joanna.
Nikolay is a member of the FPC core team. As a result, we know him
fairly well. He really is not Joanna.
Jonas
Hi Tomas,
On 4/29/23 08:33, Tomas Hajny wrote:
On 29 April 2023 0:05:53 +0200, Jacob Kroon wrote:
On 4/28/23 23:49, Tomas Hajny via fpc-other wrote:
Hi Jacob,
responding just privately this time...
^^^
I think that is an odd decision; for transparency I think its better to
have the
Nikolay Nikolov via fpc-other said on Sat, 29 Apr 2023 09:40:03 +0300
>On 4/29/23 09:02, Steve Litt via fpc-other wrote:
>1.5) In 2020, Freenode's #fpc channel was being ruined by a troll, who
>was flooding the channel with crap, offtopic links and misinformation
>about Pascal and would hijack
On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 10:49:06PM +, HSN via fpc-other wrote:
> [...]
> Now that they have for the time being given up on the goal of hijacking
> #fpc, it seems to be just the colo account in there saying things to make
> Lazarus ide look like it has problems.
> [...]
I would appreciate you
On 4/29/23 09:02, Steve Litt via fpc-other wrote:
Nikolay Nikolov via fpc-other said on Fri, 28 Apr 2023 21:39:04 +0300
Maybe #fpc-alt will become a better unofficial IRC channel? So far,
I've joined the #fpc-alt channel (without leaving #fpc), to support an
alternative channel as well, but
Jacob,
First let me say that I am someone who has been in your position, I have
some applications that I wrote in Turbo Pascal for DOS that I wanted to get
working on a modern PC, and I came across FreePascal. Many times things
just don't work the way they used to and I needed quite a bit of
Out of curiosity — has anybody compared the speed of
1. interpreting a parsed syntax tree, versus
2. interpreting byte code, versus
3. interpreting a RISC CPU ?
Regards,
Adriaan van Os
___
fpc-other maillist - fpc-other@lists.freepascal.org
Jacob Kroon via fpc-other said on Fri, 28 Apr 2023 23:31:02 +0200
>No, this is what it looks like to me, you are "Joanna".
>
>But I encourage everyone else to make their own conclusion given the
>information provided.
>
>Jacob
Come join us on #fpc-alt and ##fpc-alt. You'll be striking a blow
Nikolay Nikolov via fpc-other said on Fri, 28 Apr 2023 21:39:04 +0300
>Maybe #fpc-alt will become a better unofficial IRC channel? So far,
>I've joined the #fpc-alt channel (without leaving #fpc), to support an
>alternative channel as well, but I'm not very impressed, not only due
>to the lack
14 matches
Mail list logo
