On Sun, 10 Jan 2010 14:59:03 +0100 (CET)
mar...@stack.nl (Marco van de Voort) wrote:
[...]
I don't use Lazarus for FPC development. This is not a problem of Lazarus,
but more that I don't want to often rebuild lazarus when I'm working on FPC.
You don't need to.
Mattias
It took me a couple years to take that plunge (of course a couple years
ago Lazarus was not as robust as it is today) but I will never go back!
Lazarus does have the distinct disadvantage that it's cumbersome to work
on multiple projects at once. Especially, e.g., if I want to test some
David Emerson schreef:
on multiple projects at once. Especially, e.g., if I want to test some
feature or idea in a new little project, I tend to just do that in a
separate editor rather than opening another group of lazarus windows or
closing the big project I'm working on.
For such use
I'm on a mac and use TextMate currently. As it doesn't jump between
declaration and implementation and ist mac-only, I am looking for a
replacement.
Is Emacs a good choice? Does it work well with FPC?
Thanks,
Hans-Peter
___
fpc-pascal maillist -
In our previous episode, Hans-Peter Suter said:
Is Emacs a good choice? Does it work well with FPC?
Maybe, but what would you use as editor? :_)
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
Marco van de Voort schrieb:
In our previous episode, Hans-Peter Suter said:
Is Emacs a good choice? Does it work well with FPC?
Maybe, but what would you use as editor? :_)
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
2010/1/10 Marco van de Voort mar...@stack.nl:
In our previous episode, Hans-Peter Suter said:
Is Emacs a good choice? Does it work well with FPC?
Maybe, but what would you use as editor? :_)
;-)
What do you (and/or the other FreePascal authors) use?
Cheers,
Hans-Peter
In our previous episode, Hans-Peter Suter said:
In our previous episode, Hans-Peter Suter said:
Is Emacs a good choice? Does it work well with FPC?
Maybe, but what would you use as editor? :_)
;-)
What do you (and/or the other FreePascal authors) use?
joe for small editing or
I use Lazarus as my primary IDE (i have to use Delphi in windows sometimes).
Lazarus is the only IDE i'm using on Mac OS X.
I use it, even if develop non-LCL based applications.
The best option Lazarus has to offer is Codetools, not available in
other environments
thanks,
dmitry
Marco van de Voort wrote:
I don't use Lazarus for FPC development. This is not a problem of Lazarus,
but more that I don't want to often rebuild lazarus when I'm working on FPC.
Why do you need to rebuild lazarus when you are working on fpc?
Btw, I use lazarus for fpc development. This is
On sunnuntai, 10. tammikuuta 2010 16:04:09 dmitry boyarintsev wrote:
I use Lazarus as my primary IDE (i have to use Delphi in windows
sometimes). Lazarus is the only IDE i'm using on Mac OS X.
I use it, even if develop non-LCL based applications.
The best option Lazarus has to offer is
Yes, and I am using the devel version of FPC (2.5.1).
It works fine for building the whole Lazarus.
Juha
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
2010/1/10 dmitry boyarintsev skalogryz.li...@gmail.com:
I use Lazarus as my primary IDE (i have to use Delphi in windows sometimes).
Lazarus is the only IDE i'm using on Mac OS X.
Just installed Lazarus and it's much better than I expected. Simple
things like 'navigating around' are great.
2010/1/10 Paul Ishenin webpi...@mail.ru:
Marco van de Voort wrote:
I don't use Lazarus for FPC development. This is not a problem of Lazarus,
but more that I don't want to often rebuild lazarus when I'm working on
FPC.
Why do you need to rebuild lazarus when you are working on fpc?
I
2010/1/10 dmitry boyarintsev skalogryz.li...@gmail.com:
I use it, even if develop non-LCL based applications.
Same here, but I probably use Lazarus IDE to develop 99.9% of my work
- which is all non-LCL related projects. Actually thinking about it,
the only LCL project I sometimes work on is
Hans-Peter Suter gcha...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm on a mac and use TextMate currently. As it doesn't jump between
declaration and implementation and ist mac-only, I am looking for a
replacement.
Is Emacs a good choice? Does it work well with FPC?
I don't quite understand the question.
Why is
Ingemar Ragnemalm wrote:
Hans-Peter Suter gcha...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm on a mac and use TextMate currently. As it doesn't jump between
declaration and implementation and ist mac-only, I am looking for a
replacement.
Is Emacs a good choice? Does it work well with FPC?
I don't quite
Hans-Peter Suter wrote:
PS: thanks also to the other suggestions! And if somebody uses Emacs I
am still interested to hear about how it goes. Thanks again!
I use Emacs most of the time to edit my Pascal (and all other :) ) code.
But it has it's learning curve. And, although there are various
18 matches
Mail list logo
