Graeme Geldenhuys schreef:
On 2/8/07, Vincent Snijders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, I used unmodified fpc and the lazarus changes (a modified console
test runner)
are in svn too.
How sure are you? :-) I followed your instructions and this is the
xml 'runtests' generated.
95 % sure.
On 2/9/07, Vincent Snijders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
True the gui test runner still uses TXMLResultsWriter from xmlreporter unit. The
lazarus console testrunner uses the TXMLResultsWriter from the xmltestreport
unit.
Ok, no idea what happened!! I removed the IFDEF VER2_0 and made sure
the
Graeme Geldenhuys schreef:
On 2/9/07, Vincent Snijders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
True the gui test runner still uses TXMLResultsWriter from xmlreporter
unit. The
lazarus console testrunner uses the TXMLResultsWriter from the
xmltestreport unit.
Ok, no idea what happened!! I removed the IFDEF
On 2/9/07, Vincent Snijders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
let it read the FDoc private variable. We better create a patch for
this.
Or update to r6311 of fpc.
Ah. :) I'm on r6290.
--
Graeme Geldenhuys
There's no place like S34° 03.168' E018° 49.342'
Graeme Geldenhuys schreef:
On 2/9/07, Vincent Snijders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
let it read the FDoc private variable. We better create a patch for
this.
Or update to r6311 of fpc.
Ah. :) I'm on r6290.
That is more than a week old. I thought you updated each Monday...
Vincent
On 2/9/07, Vincent Snijders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Or update to r6311 of fpc.
Ah. :) I'm on r6290.
That is more than a week old. I thought you updated each Monday...
It's a week ago today, 2nd Feb... :-)
--
Graeme Geldenhuys
There's no place like S34° 03.168' E018° 49.342'
Hi Vincent,
I'm almost done with the new stylesheet. I've been testing it with
the new xml format sample you mentioned in you email. How did you
generate that? I wanted to test the new stylesheet against the tiOPF
project, but my xml format is different (old format). I've got the
latest FPC
Graeme Geldenhuys schreef:
Hi Vincent,
I'm almost done with the new stylesheet.
Nice \0/
I've been testing it with
the new xml format sample you mentioned in you email. How did you
generate that? I wanted to test the new stylesheet against the tiOPF
project, but my xml format is
On 2/8/07, Vincent Snijders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, I used unmodified fpc and the lazarus changes (a modified console test
runner)
are in svn too.
How sure are you? :-) I followed your instructions and this is the
xml 'runtests' generated.
-
?xml
Ok, I'll bite.. ;-)
I spoke to Dean the other day and he mentioned a new update for
FPCUnit will be sumbitted shortly. I didn't want to start on the new
XSLT stylesheet before I know what format the XML is in.
Dean, if you can confirm that the new xml format with nested test
suits are still
Graeme,
Ok, I'll bite.. ;-)
I spoke to Dean the other day and he mentioned a new update for
FPCUnit will be sumbitted shortly. I didn't want to start on the new
XSLT stylesheet before I know what format the XML is in.
Dean, if you can confirm that the new xml format with nested test
suits
Graeme Geldenhuys schreef:
Ok, I'll bite.. ;-)
Thanks. It is nice to find a volunteer. :-)
Vincent
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Hi,
Dean Zobec created a new xmlreportwriter for fpcunit. Among others it
supports nested test suites. Does anybody have a stylesheet for showing
such a report. Maybe somebody is willing to create one.
Examples of the old xml format+ style sheet (slightly modified):
13 matches
Mail list logo
