On Sun, 25 Jun 2023, Hairy Pixels via fpc-pascal wrote:
On Jun 24, 2023, at 10:27 PM, Michael Van Canneyt via fpc-pascal
wrote:
It seems to me no gain is to be had from e.g. inlining a routine of 500+ lines
of code.
What if the function was only called from 3 places in the program
> On Jun 24, 2023, at 8:37 PM, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal
> wrote:
>
> and thus leading to the necessity to do recompilations which are already not
> working that well.
Speaking of this, I've been including units in the implementation section and
this often totally breaks the compilers
> On Jun 24, 2023, at 10:27 PM, Michael Van Canneyt via fpc-pascal
> wrote:
>
> It seems to me no gain is to be had from e.g. inlining a routine of 500+ lines
> of code.
What if the function was only called from 3 places in the program and each one
of those was in something with very long
On 24/06/2023 17:21, Hairy Pixels via fpc-pascal wrote:
On Jun 24, 2023, at 10:11 PM, Hairy Pixels wrote:
Doesn't this mean the compiler can dictate the binary size by inlining
everything even if the programmer doesn't want that?
and another thing, I have frequent problems with a crash
On Sat, 24 Jun 2023, Hairy Pixels via fpc-pascal wrote:
On Jun 24, 2023, at 10:11 PM, Hairy Pixels wrote:
Doesn't this mean the compiler can dictate the binary size by inlining
everything even if the programmer doesn't want that?
and another thing, I have frequent problems with a
On Sat, 24 Jun 2023, Hairy Pixels via fpc-pascal wrote:
On Jun 24, 2023, at 7:18 PM, Michael Van Canneyt via fpc-pascal
wrote:
According to Florian, inline should not be used to begin with, since the
compiler should be able to decide autonomously to inline a routine or not.
Doesn't
> On Jun 24, 2023, at 10:11 PM, Hairy Pixels wrote:
>
> Doesn't this mean the compiler can dictate the binary size by inlining
> everything even if the programmer doesn't want that?
and another thing, I have frequent problems with a crash which happens in an
inlined function and it's now
> On Jun 24, 2023, at 7:18 PM, Michael Van Canneyt via fpc-pascal
> wrote:
>
> According to Florian, inline should not be used to begin with, since the
> compiler should be able to decide autonomously to inline a routine or not.
Doesn't this mean the compiler can dictate the binary size by
On Sat, 24 Jun 2023, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal wrote:
Michael Van Canneyt via fpc-pascal
schrieb am Sa., 24. Juni 2023, 14:18:
On Sat, 24 Jun 2023, Mattias Gaertner via fpc-pascal wrote:
Hi,
With development fpc I get a lot of messages like:
fgl.pp(1112,1) Note: (3123) "inherited"
Mattias Gaertner via fpc-pascal schrieb
am Sa., 24. Juni 2023, 13:12:
> Hi,
>
> With development fpc I get a lot of messages like:
>
> fgl.pp(1112,1) Note: (3123) "inherited" not yet supported inside inline
> procedure/function
>
> Since most users can't do anything about the fgl inline
Michael Van Canneyt via fpc-pascal
schrieb am Sa., 24. Juni 2023, 14:18:
>
>
> On Sat, 24 Jun 2023, Mattias Gaertner via fpc-pascal wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > With development fpc I get a lot of messages like:
> >
> > fgl.pp(1112,1) Note: (3123) "inherited" not yet supported inside inline
> >
On Sat, 24 Jun 2023, Mattias Gaertner via fpc-pascal wrote:
Hi,
With development fpc I get a lot of messages like:
fgl.pp(1112,1) Note: (3123) "inherited" not yet supported inside inline
procedure/function
Since most users can't do anything about the fgl inline modifier, this
message
12 matches
Mail list logo
