On 01 Aug 2011, at 09:49, Bruce Tulloch wrote:
The information on the FPC wiki and elsewhere in the lists is woefully
out of date.
In general, this is not supported (and personally I've never done it). You have
to build an Apple tool chain (assembler, linker) on a Linux host, which is not
On 01 Aug 2011, at 08:09, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
I tried to output Unicode text to console on English Windows Vista
(using Lucida Console font, which shows Greek and Cyrillic
characters).
Doesn't seem to work.
I think that you have to configure the console to use UTF-8 output
(but I
On 31 Jul 2011, at 23:11, Daniel Gaspary wrote:
The last activity on this unit seems to be from 2008. Any new
solution or workaround to make the code compatible ?
It's a third party unit that was imported from JEDI-SDL. It was even
deleted in the past because it wasn't part of the
On 03 Aug 2011, at 14:11, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
So here is to anybody that knows: What is the difference between a
target x86-64, target x86_64 and a target x64?
None. The target names are simple strings in the compiler/i_*.pas
files and unrelated to the code generation.
Jonas
On 04 Aug 2011, at 15:13, Bruce Tulloch wrote:
So I've got cross-compilation working but I have one last problem.
I can't seem to get fpc to drive the linker to search the SDK path
BEFORE the default paths. Specifically, i386-darwin-ld finds
/usr/lib/crt1.o
and NOT
On 09 Aug 2011, at 17:04, Jim wrote:
4. I just tried to open up communication and provide a way for both
sides to communicate and keep track of things.
The problem is that this is generally not how things actually get implemented
in open source software. Things get implemented by someone
On 10 Aug 2011, at 12:10, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 11:59 AM, Thomas Schatzl
tom_at_w...@gmx.at wrote:
However, you might want to use the hack from
http://mantis.freepascal.org/view.php?id=18833 on android for now.
What do you think about merging this hack
On 10 Aug 2011, at 14:24, Max Vlasov wrote:
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 1:18 PM, Max Vlasov max.vla...@gmail.com
wrote:
I tried to implement linux timer with timer_create and signals, but
an
exception always fired (External:SIGUSR1).
Hmm, it seems that it's not a 'wrong' exception, I
On 10 Aug 2011, at 15:32, Max Vlasov wrote:
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Jonas Maebe jonas.ma...@elis.ugent.be
wrote:
Can I somehow tell it to
ignore some, for example 'SIG35'? I tried to add it to Language
exceptions
ignore list as 'External: SIG35', 'External:SIG35' (without
space
On 10 Aug 2011, at 16:12, Max Vlasov wrote:
SIG35 behaves the same. Strangely, I looked in system monitor for gdb
command-line, it looked ok
/usr/bin/gdb -silent -i mi -nx --eval-command=handle SIG35 nostop
noprint
pass
but after the same Initialization output dialog it still stops with
On 11 Aug 2011, at 08:23, Bruce Tulloch wrote:
What puzzles me is that OSX allows an application to appear such that
its title bar is hidden by the desktop menu bar but does not seem to
provide an easy way to then relocate the window to a new position.
I'm clearly a Mac newbie, what am I
On 11 Aug 2011, at 11:56, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Jonas Maebe jonas.ma...@elis.ugent.be
wrote:
No, hacks like that do not belong in trunk.
And about release branches then? Are hacks allowed to be merged
directly to release branches
On 12 Aug 2011, at 13:04, Frank Church wrote:
Unless library updates don't depend on product updates shouldn't
they be
kept separate?
I don't know if it is something already done that is not explained
well
enough or is not done at all?
It is not done at all for FPC. The reason is that
On 13 Aug 2011, at 12:28, Juha Manninen wrote:
TMainMenu.Items is of type TMenuItem. TMenuItem has only one version of
Add method and it takes another TMenuItem as parameter (checked from VCL
source).
Still, to my surprise, the code works in Delphi.
FPC says: Error: Incompatible type for
On 13 Aug 2011, at 18:17, Sven Barth wrote:
Related question, but the other way round. The following code does compile in
FPC (didn't test Delphi). Is that by design?
[snip passing single element to open array parameter]
Yes. It also works in TP/Delphi.
On 15 Aug 2011, at 12:03, Ludo Brands wrote:
100.00% (288,964,608B) (page allocation syscalls) mmap/mremap/brk,
--alloc-fns, etc.
-37.20% (107,483,136B) 0x80C7DD3: SYSTEM_FPSYSCALL$LONGINT$LONGINT$$LONGINT
(in /home/ludo/lazarus/lazarus)
| -37.20% (107,483,136B) 0x80C86DF:
On 17 Aug 2011, at 18:37, leledumbo wrote:
Therefore, I'd like to redirect it to stderr, but I have no idea
how...
assign(stderr,'somefile');
rewrite(stderr);
Jonas
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
On 18 Aug 2011, at 17:08, dhkblas...@zeelandnet.nl dhkblas...@zeelandnet.nl
wrote:
I'm porting a piece of code from C++ and
there they use virtual inline methods. I tried it in FPC but it
accepts
either virtual OR inline methods. Is this a bug, or a feature that I
don't understand enough
On 22 Aug 2011, at 22:51, Marcos Douglas wrote:
In my opinion, everything that was created should have a prefix folder
specifying your TARGET.
If I compile the FPC to x64 plataform all these binaries only will run
on this platform. I want to have each file/exe/ppu/etc for each
platform.
On 22 Aug 2011, at 23:08, Marcos Douglas wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Jonas Maebe jonas.ma...@elis.ugent.be
wrote:
On 22 Aug 2011, at 22:51, Marcos Douglas wrote:
In my opinion, everything that was created should have a prefix folder
specifying your TARGET.
If I compile
On 23 Aug 2011, at 08:46, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
I just searched all my PDF docs for FPC, and couldn't find a single
reference to 'crossinstall' anywhere. :-(
The FPC documentation does not document building FPC itself, that is what the
buildfaq is for (although apparently it doesn't
On 26 Aug 2011, at 22:39, Andrew Haines wrote:
Maybe Dispose can call a destructor and that is the difference between
Dispose and FreeMem?
The other difference is that dispose() will finalize any reference counted
fields, while freemem won't.
On 26 Aug 2011, at 23:56, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Is there a keyboard shortcut for FP IDE (text IDE included with FPC)
to jump from the interface section to the implementation section of a
method.
No. As far as I know, it does not have any functionality to parse the structure
of the source
On 27 Aug 2011, at 00:18, Andrew Haines wrote:
Ok so freemem is okay as long as I am careful about the members of the
object.
There may be other problems I'm not thinking of right now. I don't understand
why you want to use freemem for objects, since the only difference with dispose
is that
On 09 Sep 2011, at 13:40, Marco van de Voort wrote:
In our previous episode, michael.vancann...@wisa.be said:
You must remove the quotes around 'outputfile.org':
Status:=ExecuteProcess('/path/to/oggenc',['-Q','--
output=outputfile.org','tempfile.wav']);
While better, this is afaik not
On 10 Sep 2011, at 22:32, Flávio Etrusco wrote:
Does FPC allow overloading the += operator? If not, why?
It is translated into x:=x+y at the parser level, and overload resolving
happens later. So once you overload + (and := if required), += should also
work.
Jonas
On 14 Sep 2011, at 19:16, Fabio Luis Girardi wrote:
I'm debugging and I have doubt: I'm using records and pointers to
records. On WinCE wiki, the use of unaligned only shows with pointers
to integer. And with recods, I must do
unalinged(myrec^).member
or
unalinged(myrec^.member)
If
On 14 Sep 2011, at 23:17, Marcos Douglas wrote:
BUT, if I create my TFoo without refcount should works, right?
Only in some circumstances. These circumstances depend on when the
compiler allocates temporary interface instances, and when these are
finalized.
... but, does not work. In
On 16 Sep 2011, at 09:02, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Should that example not mention that it will not work with any
released
FPC version to date?
No.
That example will only work with the still to be
released 2.6.0 and later. Why Because current released FPC versions
don't support the
On 27 Sep 2011, at 22:34, Murray Whittington wrote:
I downloaded free pascal for mac osx and I discovered that it wont
run on OSX Lion :(
as Apple has removed X11 and other modules etc out of lion so
basically have to go back to snow leopard to make it work, but I
have Lion installed.
On 30 Sep 2011, at 16:56, fred f wrote:
I have updated my FPC to SVN from today and when I try to compile my
old code working with 2.5.1 from June writes:
TYPE TByteSet = set of Byte(0)..Byte(7);
Fatal: Syntax error, ; expected but ( found
What has changed on syntax for this definition?
On 30 Sep 2011, at 18:27, Paul Ishenin wrote:
This is probably my fault although:
1. delphi does not support such declarations
2. we don't have a test for this kind of syntax
So maybe we had a feature by accident?
Set type is defined as set of ordinal type:
On 13 Oct 2011, at 11:42, fred f wrote:
I am trying to compile my code which is compatible with Delphi and FPC
2.5.1+, but when I try to compile on Mac OS X with 2.4.4 I have error
message:
Error: Illegal type conversion: Set of TMyEnum to Byte
It works in FPC 2.5.1+ because of this change:
On 13 Oct 2011, at 20:36, Andrew Pennebaker wrote:
If I were using C, I would type:
#include code.h
If I were using Python, I would type:
import code
What's the command to load code in Pascal?
http://www.learn-programming.za.net/programming_pascal_learn12.html
Jonas
On 13 Oct 2011, at 21:37, Andrew Pennebaker wrote:
Is it possible to have a begin/end declaration in a unit a la C's main
function? I would like my units to double as libraries and executables.
Yes: http://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/ref/refse72.html
Jonas
On 15 Oct 2011, at 17:24, Andrew Pennebaker wrote:
Good idea, van de Voort. Can someone confirm that fpc plays nicely with
shebangs in a version after 2.4.4?
It doesn't.
Jonas
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
On 16 Oct 2011, at 11:42, Jürgen Hestermann wrote:
But hiding away the compilation step from the user does not turn a compiler
language into an interpreter language. There is no benefit in doing so. You
can simply compile your programs and then use the executable in your scripts.
Where is
On 18 Oct 2011, at 20:03, Andrew Pennebaker wrote:
In particular, if anyone knows a way to implement a general concatenation
function Concat(Arr1, Arr2), let me know.
I'm under the impression that you are trying to program in a statically typed
language the same way as you'd use a
On 19 Oct 2011, at 09:59, Marco van de Voort wrote:
In our previous episode, Sven Barth said:
This implementation will result in crashes if T is a reference-
counted type.
Right... I tend to forget about these... what would the correct way
to
copy an array of ref counted types? E.g. an
On 21 Oct 2011, at 08:25, Roberto P. wrote:
During compilation, by statically checking the indices used to access the
string, the compiler could fire a warning (or error?) if a string[0] is
found.
The compiler already does that (except for shortstrings, where string[0] is
valid).
Jonas
On 26 Oct 2011, at 13:47, Marcos Douglas wrote:
I got this error when I tried to compile FPC 2.7.1 rev 19546.
-
W:/md/dev/freepascal/binutils/ppc386.2_6.exe -Ur -Xs -O2 -n -Fi../
inc -Fi../i386
On 26 Oct 2011, at 14:25, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Maybe the makefile can be amended to check the version number of the
FPC being used. If you are trying to compile Trunk, and the FPC
version you want to use is not the last known released version, give a
error indicating the problem, and
On 26 Oct 2011, at 14:44, Marcos Douglas wrote:
Hm... thinking better you're right. You're the man, the real
developer, so... is boring answer these mails, I know, but I really
want to help the community! I'm not saying: Solve my problem!! you
know... I use the stable version. The trunk is
On 26 Oct 2011, at 15:04, Martin wrote:
On 26/10/2011 13:58, Jonas Maebe wrote:
What is boring is not helping people that have problems, but
answering exactly the same question over and over again (although
the fact that the same question keeps being asked obviously means
that just
On 26 Oct 2011, at 15:28, Martin wrote:
To build trunk (or any revision) with a starting compiler, that is
itself the same revision = I would expect that to work always?
Yes, but there is no way to encode such an exception in the Makefile
without requiring a bunch of svn-related
On 31 Oct 2011, at 08:36, Andrew Pennebaker wrote:
I forcibly sudo cp ppc386 /usr/local/bin/fpc, mitigating the issue. Yeah,
something in the makefile installation process is definitely moving over an
older version.
Create a symlink from /usr/local/bin/ppc386 to
On 31 Oct 2011, at 11:27, Luciano de Souza wrote:
The executable was not generated. In its place, I found link.res. The
compilation was successful, but for a unknown reason, the linkage was not
completed. I don't understand what the statements in link.res means indeed.
In spite of the
On 31 Oct 2011, at 12:10, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Mon, 31 Oct 2011, Jonas Maebe wrote:
sqlite3 is not part of FPC. You probably have to install the sqlite3-dev
package or something like that. Arguably, that should be a dependency of
the fpc .deb package that installs support
On 31 Oct 2011, at 18:29, Andrew Pennebaker wrote:
Jonas, make install does, however, overwrite /usr/local/bin/fpc, which is
not a symlink, with an old version during install. Try running fpc -version
halfway and after make install.
The fpc binary does not have a version number. It reports
On 01 Nov 2011, at 10:30, Juha Manninen wrote:
WriteStr (S, N);
Thanks guys!
WriteStr() was the function I was looking for.
You can also use the plain str() procedure.
Jonas
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
On 02 Nov 2011, at 20:34, silvioprog wrote:
I have accessed the link
http://lists.freepascal.org/lists/fpc-pascal/; to read old entries.
And I saw that the last date is 2025
That's what happens when someone sends a mail while their system clock is set
such a date in the future.
On 06 Nov 2011, at 02:32, Seth Grover wrote:
A couple of questions: where can this be found in svn? I don't see a
tag for it, and fixes_2_6 hasn't been modified for 8 weeks or so.
http://svn.freepascal.org/svn/fpc/tags/release_2_6_0_rc1/
Jonas
___
On 06 Nov 2011, at 11:56, Tommi Prami wrote:
On 6.11.2011 1:27, Marco van de Voort wrote:
Details about these new features can be found at
http://wiki.freepascal.org/FPC_New_Features_2.6.0
Seems that Freepascal Wiki is not available. If someone can access it post
the information on
On 06 Nov 2011, at 15:13, dmitry boyarintsev wrote:
Hi-jacking, the thread, and again should FPC chase Delphi forever?
If we want to offer compatibility with source code written for Delphi, which
does happen to be one of FPC's project goals, then yes, we do have to do that
to some extent.
On 06 Nov 2011, at 15:34, Frank Church wrote:
What is the difference between field declarations at the beginning of a
class and those declared in the public section?
There is no the public section. You can declare as many public (and private,
and ...) sections as you want.
They are all
On 06 Nov 2011, at 19:26, Frank Church wrote:
So it means that unless a field or method is in the private or protected
section
or published, strict private or strict protected section
it is automatically public?
Yes (or published in case of {$m+}, as Michael added).
Jonas
On 06 Nov 2011, at 19:21, Jürgen Hestermann wrote:
Florian Klämpfl schrieb:
I have the same feeling as Dmitry: There must be a time when FPC does
not run after Delphi. Why not now?
Feel free to start a fork and we will see what will make it into trunk.
Sorry, but I don't know what you
On 07 Nov 2011, at 08:10, Martin Schreiber wrote:
I don't understand why FPC should become a 100% Delphi clone instead
the best
general software development environment ever for the only purpose
that
Delphi users have a free cross platform alternative without to care
about FPC
On 07 Nov 2011, at 11:28, Martin Schreiber wrote:
On Monday 07 November 2011 10.55:41 Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 07 Nov 2011, at 08:10, Martin Schreiber wrote:
One reason is to make it easy for FPC users to reuse existing Delphi
code that is out there without having to rewrite it in an FPC
On 07 Nov 2011, at 18:45, Jürgen Hestermann wrote:
Jonas Maebe schrieb:
That's exactly what he said: you are free to create a fork (= take the FPC
source code and do whatever you want with it), and then the currently active
FPC developers are also free to take whichever of your patches
On 08 Nov 2011, at 10:55, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
I was reviewing some old code that used TCollection TCollectionItem
descendants. This made me think... With the introduction of Generics,
is there really still a need for TCollection/TCollectionItem?
At the very least, backward
On 07 Nov 2011, at 23:27, Peter wrote:
Does this release include intrinsic ROL ROR?
'Bug' 6300 is shown as fixed, but I can find no mention in the new
features list.
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=6300
I've added it to the wiki page.
Jonas
On 12 Nov 2011, at 22:18, ik wrote:
Since 2.6.0, when you write something like this:
procedure foo(AClass : TStrings);
foo(MyStringList); // Will return an error that TStrings is expected ...
Are you certain there is no var or out in front of that parameter?
I can not use TStringList as
On 13 Nov 2011, at 14:02, Rainer Stratmann wrote:
Am Sunday 13 November 2011 02:15:07 schrieb leledumbo:
It works when {$LONGSTRINGS ON} or {$H+} directive exists. I think the
compiler treats functions receiving array of char (or pointer to it) as
ShortString when none of the directives
On 13 Nov 2011, at 17:56, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 12/11/2011, ik idokan@ wrote:
procedure foo(AClass : TStrings);
foo(MyStringList); // Will return an error that TStrings is expected ...
I can not use TStringList as the parameter without casting it to TStrings.
But I do not
On 14 Nov 2011, at 22:08, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 1:39 AM, Rainer Stratmann
rainerstratm...@t-online.de wrote:
procedure getchars( p : pchar );
var l : longint;
begin
l := length( p );
end;
You cannot do length in a PChar
length(pchar) is translated
On 16 Nov 2011, at 17:06, Martin wrote:
So why not use pos(#0, foo_pchar) ?
That will convert foo_pchar to a string type (which one probably
depends on the state of the {$h} switch) and then call pos() on it.
Again: length(pchar) is perfectly correct and will be translated into
On 16 Nov 2011, at 17:15, Sven Barth wrote:
Am 16.11.2011 16:55, schrieb Rainer Stratmann:
But when having pchar I wonder why it generally is not possible to
make
strings longer than 255 as it was possible in the previous compiler
version.
There was never a change regarding this as far
On 16 Nov 2011, at 17:15, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 11:33 AM, Jonas Maebe jonas.ma...@elis.ugent.be
wrote:
length(pchar) is translated into strlen(pchar) (just like in Delphi).
But why is it limited to 255 chars in {$H-} ?
It is not.
(I understood
On 20 Nov 2011, at 21:30, Torsten Bonde Christiansen wrote:
I get the following error when crosscompiling lNet to arm-linux.
$ fpc -MObjFPC -Sgim -CX -O2 -Parm -gs -gl -vew -l -Fi../lib/sys -Fu../lib
-Fu. -FUlib/arm-linux/ -dLNET_BASE -fPIC lnetbase.pas
Free Pascal Compiler version 2.4.4
On 20 Nov 2011, at 21:41, Torsten Bonde Christiansen wrote:
On 2011-11-20 21:36, Jonas Maebe wrote:
It's a missing feature. The problem is that you are trying to generate PIC
ARM code, which is not yet implemented/supported.
Is it going to be in 2.6. Perhaps in trunk?
It's
On 23 Nov 2011, at 22:48, Jesus Reyes wrote:
in the following example The output is:
cls class is TFoo
TObj.create
where I would expect:
cls class is TFoo
TObj.create
TFoo.create
ie the TFoo.constructor is not called, is this normal/expected?
Yes. You have to use a virtual
On 23 Nov 2011, at 23:01, Juha Manninen wrote:
The following does not compile any more with FPC 2.6.0-0.rc1.
---
generic TGen_T = class
type public
T_TArray = array of _T;
var private
w: T_TArray;
public
constructor Create(Value: _T);
end;
TSpecial =
On 24 Nov 2011, at 02:58, Luiz Americo Pereira Camara wrote:
On 23/11/2011 18:48, Jesus Reyes wrote:
in the following example The output is:
cls class is TFoo
TObj.create
where I would expect:
cls class is TFoo
TObj.create
TFoo.create
I also hit this problem recently
Found that this is
On 24 Nov 2011, at 10:46, Bernd wrote:
The branch fixes_2_6 still has the version 2.5.1. shouldn't this be
set to 2.6.0-RC1.1?
No. Only releases have even version numbers (RC or not). Branches are
only updated to the next version number (in this case, that will be
2.6.1) once the
On 24 Nov 2011, at 12:06, Rainer Stratmann wrote:
Isn't it possible to put all processors in the compiler.
In theory, that would be possible with lots of rewriting. In practice
there is little or no reason to spend time on that. You can always use
fpc -Pi386 and fpc -Parm to call the
On 24 Nov 2011, at 16:28, andrew.benn...@ns.sympatico.ca andrew.benn...@ns.sympatico.ca
wrote:
At no point did the heap status reveal the growing amount of space
tied up: the
only odd thing was that TotalAllocated sometimes came back negative in
the threads as the program approached the
On 24 Nov 2011, at 18:14, Bernd wrote:
Yes, I understand the intention. But this leads to the dilemma that
now the branch which is by definition always same or more advanced
than the last release(candidate) from it still has a *lower* version
number than the already released release
On 24 Nov 2011, at 23:00, Luiz Americo Pereira Camara wrote:
On 24/11/2011 08:02, Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 24 Nov 2011, at 02:58, Luiz Americo Pereira Camara wrote:
On 23/11/2011 18:48, Jesus Reyes wrote:
where I would expect:
cls class is TFoo
TObj.create
TFoo.create
I also hit
On 25 Nov 2011, at 08:43, Marco van de Voort wrote:
IMHO if you get into trouble with this, you are already walking on
the edge
of the abyss. Using cmem (or any other advanced memory manager)
might give
short time relieve because it probably has a different allocation
pattern.
Not
On 26 Nov 2011, at 09:05, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
arm-linux-ld seams to have a fixed idea about where to find libc
No, FPC has that fixed idea. Use the -Xd command line option to make the
compiler/linker skip searching the default directories for libraries and object
files.
On 26 Nov 2011, at 16:10, Martin wrote:
I know WriteStr can be used to get the names of enum: WriteStr(s, enumOne)
Plain Str also works: Str(enumOne,s).
But should/could it also work on sub-range types of int?
Like
TGraphicsColor = -$7FFF-1..$7FFF;
or even
TFoo = type integer;
On 03 Dec 2011, at 21:41, Bernd wrote:
Hello, I have observed something I do not understand. The following is
a series of for-loops and the generated code looks strange to me.
There always appears an inc followed by a dec
Note that the inc comes before the loop body and the dec is inside it.
On 06 Dec 2011, at 00:39, Bernd wrote:
var
x : QWord;
begin
x := $;
writeln(IntToHex(x, 16));
end.
All constants $ are always parsed as int64. You have to explicitly
typecast them to qword() if you want the compiler to treat them that way.
On 07 Dec 2011, at 13:51, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
I think the random() algorithm is simply much more complicated in FPC.
That's correct. We use the mersenne twister, Delphi probably a linear
congruential generator. The mersenne twister has a much larger period.
Jonas
On 09 Dec 2011, at 09:39, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Looking at the code again, I have no idea how it will affect the
encryption algorithm if I move the assignment to RandSeed outside the
loop
It will improve the randomness of the generated numbers. Changing the
random seed all the time
On 09 Dec 2011, at 19:37, nore...@z505.com wrote:
See what happened to common lisp clisp when they used it. Had to change
license to GPL even though they didn't want to.
They changed the license because they didn't want to stop using GNU
libreadline. If they had switched to a BSD-licensed
On 11 Dec 2011, at 23:18, Torsten Bonde Christiansen wrote:
So in the following example foo would not be visible (neither as foo nor
bar) to other program (eg. a C-program) unless I added an *exports* section?
Correct. See also
On 12 Dec 2011, at 00:48, nore...@z505.com wrote:
In newer versions of FPC it allows you to put an exports clause in the
unit itself, but older versions didn't allow it.
http://bugs.freepascal.org/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=4398history=1
That functionality is buggy and cannot be used safely
On 12 Dec 2011, at 19:56, nore...@z505.com wrote:
procedure proc1; stdcall;
begin
writeln('hello');
end; exports proc1;
procedure proc2; stdcall;
begin
writeln('hello 2');
end; exports proc2;
end.
Notice how I put exports in several places...
It works on win32..
It only
On 12 Dec 2011, at 20:17, Torsten Bonde Christiansen wrote:
On 2011-12-12 20:04, Jonas Maebe wrote:
It only partially works. Please see the bug report I mentioned earlier:
http://bugs.freepascal.org/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=16070
Does this just mean I have to compile my library
On 13 Dec 2011, at 15:42, Bernd wrote:
Is it thoretically possible to make an otherwise perfectly working
program crash with access violation only because I used the
nostackframe modifier on a nested procedure?
Yes. See also http://bugs.freepascal.org/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=15527
On 13 Dec 2011, at 22:08, ik wrote:
A clean svn version of fpc 2.6.0 (rc), and Lazarus 0.9.31 r34161 FPC 2.5.1
x86_64-linux-gtk 2.
It happens only on install all of the components. After clean all. I also
tried to re-download lazarus from svn as a clean copy, again the same issue.
You
On 15 Dec 2011, at 16:19, Andrew Brunner wrote:
project has the source to. And FPC is looking to recompile the
compiled object file because a CRC has changed for a contributing unit
that was used when the unit object file was created.
How do I make FPC not rebuild the unit object file when
On 16 Dec 2011, at 21:36, Bernd wrote:
This seems to compile and work as intended, no matter which of the two
implementations I choose. But I wonder how this can work? I always
thought that what is written in the interface section is
authoritative. How can the compiler properly use this unit
On 17 Dec 2011, at 01:46, Bernd wrote:
Is there maybe any other document somewhere that describes what
*exactly* is expected by the compiler to happen with the registers
during a function call or maybe somebody can show me where in the FPC
sources I have to look to see for myself what
On 17 Dec 2011, at 01:59, Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 17 Dec 2011, at 01:46, Bernd wrote:
Is there maybe any other document somewhere that describes what
*exactly* is expected by the compiler to happen with the registers
during a function call or maybe somebody can show me where in the FPC
On 17 Dec 2011, at 18:22, Juha Manninen wrote:
Fatal: Syntax error, expected but CLASS found
Works on 64-bit Linux.
How can OSX affect generics syntax?
There are no Mac OS X-specific failures of generics tests in the testsuite (64
bit or otherwise, Intel or PowerPC). There are no bug
On 18 Dec 2011, at 14:04, dhkblas...@zeelandnet.nl wrote:
mytest^.name := Format('%s.%.3d', ['name', 1]);
This assigns
'name.001' to the pointer variable but causes a memleak. If I assign the
same value as string constant no memleak occurs, so it must be something
related to format.
On 18 Dec 2011, at 15:45, dhkblas...@zeelandnet.nl wrote:
It was an
ansistring indeed, and finalize did the trick! Thanks for your help. How
does New and Dispose work btw? Do they use RTTI to call finalize
appropriatly?
Yes.
I tried searching the New and Dispose implementations in
the
1 - 100 of 2929 matches
Mail list logo
