Why is SVG better than WMF or EMF? I don't like embedding Visio files,
so I save as WMF and insert the WMF. It seems to work fine and keeps the
lines perfectly sharp (since WMF is partially a vector format.)
Is there a good reason to switch to SVG?
Regards,
Shmuel Wolfson
Technical Writer
Dear FrameUsers.
REVERB - for all mobile devices - test it, open it on any Smartphone, on
your iPad, ...:
http://www.squidds.de/downloads/bihler
+ Search anything with words out from the content, Google will find it.
+ Chapter 1: 3D for Smartphone, iPad or PC (and Tablet-PC)
open it with
Adobe recommends GIF or JPEG format for graphics.
Also, the company I work for is setting up RoboHelp (not using Frame to
RoboHelp). I'm curious how you have files set up in version control or
on the network server?
Lea Galanter
Lead Technical Editor Writer
FTI Consulting
Confidentiality
John Sgammato wrote:
With all due respect to my colleagues on this forum, IMO the line
between JPG and other formats is no longer as neat as it once was. Many
screenshots in Win 7 require gradients that JPG handles well. IMO
anything that a photo can handle might not be so far removed as you
Lea Galanter (lea.galan...@fticonsulting.com) wrote:
Adobe recommends GIF or JPEG format for graphics.
First, I assume you are spekaing strictly in a FrameMaker context, because othe
Adobe tools use PS, EPS, and PDF as their preferred formats.
But I have to say that I have never seen any
Shmuel Wolfson wrote:
Why is SVG better than WMF or EMF? I don't like embedding Visio files,
so I save as WMF and insert the WMF. It seems to work fine and keeps
the
lines perfectly sharp (since WMF is partially a vector format.)
Is there a good reason to switch to SVG?
WMF (Windows
The cloudy artifacts that JPG puts around text may not be noticeable if
you save the JPG at highest quality, but the more compression you use,
the more annoyingly obvious it becomes. I believe the original poster in
this thread said that the document was intended for the Web, and since
it is
Quite frankly, I don't know of anyplace where Adobe as a company officially
recommends GIF for any graphics.
And JPEG certainly is not recommended by Adobe for anything other than
photographic images, i.e. imagery that would not be more readily represented
via text and/or vector graphics.
And
Esteemed colleagues,
Is there a way to scale graphics in Frame10 that works like the Fitting
capability in Photoshop
Tom Scalise
Information Development Manager
Office (561) 622-5416
Fax (561) 622-9938
thomas.scal...@crossmatch.commailto:thomas.scal...@crossmatch.com
[Description: Description:
H. My experience is with WinXP (hey, if it works don't break it). I
did test prints of screen captures as pngs and high-quality jpegs. The
pngs were *much* sharper, esp when printed out.
Then again, I was capturing text-heavy GUI screens, not webpages, and
it was WinXP.
Probably be a
Thanks to all of you who responded for your input. It sounds like .jpg or .png
will be the way to go - I will have to do more research and experimentation to
determine which. I am only at the beginning of this process, but I appreciate
pointing me in the right direction.
Thank you for the
If you are talking about JPEG 2000, I would agree.
I still find that adding annotations on a JPG (unless one uses no
compression), leaves artifacts, which are especially noticeable when
they get scaled.
If you are not scaling and not annotating directly on the image, then
JPG is probably not a bad
The Scale Graphics Proportionately framescript from Klaus Muller may be
what you are looking for.
http://www.i-frame.itl.info/en/feature-description/i-frame-modules/base-pack/scale-graphics-proportionally.html
It used to be free and available from the files area of the
framescript-users Yahoo
It was the 8-bit (256 color) PNG files that were a problem in FrameMaker.
They would add all 256 colors to the document color palette, which could be
annoying. It seems as though most graphics programs no longer have an 8-bit
option when saving png, 24-bit only these days, which do not mess with
Grant Hogarth wrote:
(And yes, I agree that FM needs to improve it's handling of PNG
colors. FM10 seems to have eliminated most of that problem (in that
I've not noticed it in FM 10), but I've also not pushed the limits. (I
also save in indexed PNG, which may have something to do with it.)
Virginia Morgan wrote:
Any other experience/advice is appreciated. My recent graphic design
experience has also led me to conclude that .jpgs work well for much
more than photos, but the main reason we didn't use them in old
versions of FrameMaker (6.0 and before) even with photos was that
at takesolutions.com<mailto:virginia.morgan at
takesolutions.com>
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20120116/512c5621/attachment.html>
Why is SVG better than WMF or EMF? I don't like embedding Visio files,
so I save as WMF and insert the WMF. It seems to work fine and keeps the
lines perfectly sharp (since WMF is partially a vector format.)
Is there a good reason to switch to SVG?
Regards,
Shmuel Wolfson
Technical Writer
Dear FrameUsers.
REVERB - for all mobile devices - test it, open it on any Smartphone, on
your iPad, ...:
http://www.squidds.de/downloads/bihler
+ Search anything with words out from the content, Google will find it.
+ Chapter 1: 3D for Smartphone, iPad or PC (and Tablet-PC)
> open it with
Adobe recommends GIF or JPEG format for graphics.
Also, the company I work for is setting up RoboHelp (not using Frame to
RoboHelp). I'm curious how you have files set up in version control or
on the network server?
Lea Galanter
Lead Technical Editor & Writer
FTI Consulting
Confidentiality
John Sgammato wrote:
> With all due respect to my colleagues on this forum, IMO the line
> between JPG and other formats is no longer as neat as it once was. Many
> screenshots in Win 7 require gradients that JPG handles well. IMO
> anything that a photo can handle might not be so far removed as
any such recommendation for FrameMaker
graphics. What is your source for this statement?
-Fred Ridder
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20120116/2e7bb33c/attachment.html>
Shmuel Wolfson wrote:
> Why is SVG better than WMF or EMF? I don't like embedding Visio files,
> so I save as WMF and insert the WMF. It seems to work fine and keeps
> the
> lines perfectly sharp (since WMF is partially a vector format.)
>
> Is there a good reason to switch to SVG?
WMF
t --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20120116/5c9e7345/attachment.html>
scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20120116/e031f443/attachment.html>
ly
and destroy this e-mail and all copies of it.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20120116/4ac8f7a9/attachment.html>
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was sc
Thomas Scalise wrote:
> Is there a way to scale graphics in Frame10 that works like the
> "Fitting" capability in Photoshop
I don't know what the Fitting capability in Photoshop is. But to maintain the
maximum quality in graphics imported into FM, IMHO the best way to scale them
is by
ndividual sender, except where the sender has the
authority to issue and specifically states them to
be the views of Allied Telesis Labs.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20120116/08364f08/attachment.html>
;mailto:virginia.morgan at
takesolutions.com>
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20120116/4c6287db/attachment.html>
u, and I am happy to
> be back to this forum!
>
>
>
> Virginia Morgan | Technical Writer
>
> TAKE Solutions, Inc.
>
> O 512.735.4316 | M 512.426.8323
>
> virginia.morgan at takesolutions.com
> <mailto:virginia.morgan at takesolutions.com>
>
>
>
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20120116/b6886690/attachment.html>
The Scale Graphics Proportionately framescript from Klaus Muller may be
what you are looking for.
http://www.i-frame.itl.info/en/feature-description/i-frame-modules/base-pack/scale-graphics-proportionally.html
It used to be free and available from the files area of the
framescript-users Yahoo
occurs when the PNGs are saved
with a bit depth other than 8. I'm sure someone more familiar with them will
pipe in.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20120116/28c0196b/attachment.html>
Grant Hogarth wrote:
> (And yes, I agree that FM needs to improve it's handling of PNG
> colors.? FM10 seems to have eliminated most of that problem (in that
> I've not noticed it in FM 10), but I've also not pushed the limits.? (I
> also save in indexed PNG, which may have something to do with
Virginia Morgan wrote:
> Any other experience/advice is appreciated. My recent graphic design
> experience has also led me to conclude that .jpgs work well for much
> more than photos, but the main reason we didn't use them in old
> versions of FrameMaker (6.0 and before) even with photos was
34 matches
Mail list logo
