Hi Elchanan,
PDFill is a PDF editor, not a PDF creator. The pdfmark issue is with PDF
creators. They need to read the pdfmark code that FrameMaker embeds in the
PostScript stream to create bookmarks, links, etc. as the PDF file is
created. They do have a free PDF Writer, but it is not clear if
[Unless I am missing something.]
FrameMaker has the bundled/integrated PDF Creation Add-on (=headless
Distiller). So even if one does not have Acrobat installed, creation of PDFs
from within FrameMaker, with full support for interactive features / pdfmark
processing etc. is available (no less
Hi Shlomo,
Yes, that's true. I apologize for looking beyond the obvious. Thanks for
your insight.
Rick
From: framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com
[mailto:framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of Shlomo Perets
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2013 8:06 AM
To: 'VLM TechSubs'
Cc:
Adam Engst's article in TidBITs, *Creative Cloud Complaints Darken Adobe’s
View of the Future,* (http://tidbits.com/e/13765) makes/shares some
excellent points. If the Creative Cloud experiment succeeds, TCS/FrameMaker
could be next.
--Karen
___
You
Given their recent punting of the multi-year license maintenance program for
FrameMaker, I think you are very right.
Z
From: framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com
[mailto:framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of Karen Robbins
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2013 2:55 PM
To:
I expect the problem is that you expected this to be the same command when in
fact pods for objects do one thing and direct access to definition or editing
of an object does another.
I think I sent you a link long ago to a video by Adobe about using of the new
interface. You seemed
Well, yes, that was the problem. Two UI objects have the same name but
one is a subset of the other. Why would I expect that? Why does the
default workspace show some of the crappy ones instead of all of the
more capable ones? Why don't the limited ones have buttons that expand
them into the more
Regards,
Shmuel Wolfson
Technical Writer
052-763-7133
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20130520/08f7228f/attachment.html>
ou kindly,
Elchanan
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20130520/2e1c8fb1/attachment.html>
min at frameusers.com. Visit
> http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.
>
>
--
Lin Sims
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20130520/a3400bc3/attachment.html&g
e
with the expertise) be willing to take a look ... it's quite brief, I think.
Thank you kindly,
Elchanan
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20130520/a0874f37/attachment.html>
attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20130520/eaa7df7c/attachment.html>
/FrameMaker could be next.
--Karen
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20130520/974c326a/attachment.html>
lman/options/framers/craigede%40hotmail.com
>
> Send administrative questions to listadmin at frameusers.com. Visit
> http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20130520/47fb2c63/attachment.html>
Well, yes, that was the problem. Two UI objects have the same name but
one is a subset of the other. Why would I expect that? Why does the
default workspace show some of the crappy ones instead of all of the
more capable ones? Why don't the limited ones have buttons that expand
them into the more
15 matches
Mail list logo
