On 18 May 2009 at 17:03, Madeleine r Dimond wrote:
I received a complaint from a writer who said that FrameMaker 9 took up so
much processing power that she could not make a pdf of her 700-page book,
even though she could do so in FrameMaker 8. We're using Windows XP SP2,
and she has 3.25 GB
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 7:24 PM, Combs, Richard
richard.co...@polycom.com wrote:
Processing power? Not likely (I'm tempted to say nonsense). How
was
she creating the PDF? When and how did it fail?
The log file for the job (which should be in the directory in which
the
PDF was
On 18 May 2009 at 17:03, Madeleine r Dimond wrote:
> I received a complaint from a writer who said that FrameMaker 9 took up so
> much processing power that she could not make a pdf of her 700-page book,
> even though she could do so in FrameMaker 8. We're using Windows XP SP2,
> and she has 3.25
> On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 7:24 PM, Combs, Richard
> wrote:
> >
> > "Processing power"? Not likely (I'm tempted to say "nonsense"). How
was
> > she creating the PDF? When and how did it fail?
> >
> > The log file for the job (which should be in the directory in which
the
> > PDF was being
Madeleine r Dimond wrote:
I received a complaint from a writer who said that FrameMaker 9 took
up so
much processing power that she could not make a pdf of her 700-page
book,
even though she could do so in FrameMaker 8. We're using Windows XP
SP2,
and she has 3.25 GB of RAM.
Processing
I'd echo Richard's nonsense comment.
If nothing else is wrong (forgetting to uncheck Print to File, etc.),
what actually may be happening is that her hard drive is filling up,
or just the temp and swap space is constrained. If the system doesn't
have enough room to create the temp files that it
I received a complaint from a writer who said that FrameMaker 9 took up so
much processing power that she could not make a pdf of her 700-page book,
even though she could do so in FrameMaker 8. We're using Windows XP SP2,
and she has 3.25 GB of RAM.
Has anyone experienced anything similar?
Madeleine r Dimond wrote:
> I received a complaint from a writer who said that FrameMaker 9 took
up so
> much processing power that she could not make a pdf of her 700-page
book,
> even though she could do so in FrameMaker 8. We're using Windows XP
SP2,
> and she has 3.25 GB of RAM.
"Processing
I'd echo Richard's "nonsense" comment.
If nothing else is wrong (forgetting to uncheck Print to File, etc.),
what actually may be happening is that her hard drive is filling up,
or just the temp and swap space is constrained. If the system doesn't
have enough room to create the temp files that it
