Fred Ridder wrote:
I think it would be a great idea if we could treat anchored
frames as embedded objects with similar properties to tables. But I do
think it would want to be implemented for anchored frames generically
rather than just for figures since some documents use anchored frames
(or
Yeah, it is so fun to (a) insert a single-celled table previously set up
as a format, (b) import a graphic file or create an anchored frame into
the single para in the cell, and (c) set the anchored frame to At
Insertion Point so you can get the spacing even all around, and then (d)
adjust
Deirdre Reagan wrote:
> Does anyone know why FM automatically makes Table captions but not
> Figure captions?
>
You have had your answer elsewhere on this list. But, seriously, why
isn't there a figure object that is similar to a one-celled table, which
is a pain to set up.
The new figure
Responding to Deirdre Reagan's original query, Hedley Finger wrote
(in small part):
> Deirdre Reagan wrote:
> > Does anyone know why FM automatically makes Table captions but not
> > Figure captions?
>
> You have had your answer elsewhere on this list. But, seriously, why
> isn't there a
Fred Ridder wrote:
> I think it would be a great idea if we could treat anchored
> frames as embedded objects with similar properties to tables. But I do
> think it would want to be implemented for anchored frames generically
> rather than just for figures since some documents use anchored frames
> Yeah, it is so fun to (a) insert a single-celled table previously set up
> as a format, (b) import a graphic file or create an anchored frame into
> the single para in the cell, and (c) set the anchored frame to At
> Insertion Point so you can get the spacing even all around, and then (d)
>
