RE: Outsourcing: Was Reasons to Structure

2007-02-17 Thread Sean Pollock
dea. Sean -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dodd, Frank J Sent: Friday, February 16, 2007 5:33 PM To: framers@lists.frameusers.com Subject: RE: Outsourcing: Was Reasons to Structure So what exactly is the pay range for a technical writer? I

RE: Outsourcing: Was Reasons to Structure

2007-02-16 Thread Dodd, Frank J
So what exactly is the pay range for a technical writer? I ting I kan rite gude and wude licke to chry eet. Seriously. Actually I create work instructions for about 80% of my work time. Frank -Original Message- From: Gillian Flato [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 16, 20

RE: Outsourcing: Was Release Date for FrameMaker 8?

2006-05-17 Thread Niels Fanøe
Niels: -> > how are they ever going to be able to buy American (or Danish, for -> > that matter) products and services? Only by sharing our -> wealth (and -> > jobs - even if it hurts) can we all survive and thrive in the long -> > run. John: -> Niels...a point from both sides... -> -> - If y

RE: Outsourcing: Was Release Date for FrameMaker 8?

2006-05-17 Thread John Posada
> how are they ever going to be able to buy American (or Danish, for > that matter) products and services? Only by sharing our wealth (and > jobs - even if it hurts) can we all survive and thrive in the long > run. Niels...a point from both sides... - If you can't get through the short run, the l

RE: Outsourcing: Was Release Date for FrameMaker 8?

2006-05-17 Thread Niels Fanøe
I appreciate that some you are afraid that the US will lose jobs to India and such countries. But take a bigger perspective on this, will you? If India (et.al.) are not involved with "Western" technology - if they don't get any hi-tech jobs and industries - how are they ever going to be able to

RE: Outsourcing

2006-05-16 Thread John Posada
> Let's not take ourselves too seriously. > > I'm not "demanding" anything, I could actually care less. I was > just > following up to John's point that no one benefits from outsourcing > "except the consumer" to say that I have a hard time believing the > consumer benefits that much either. Not

Re: Outsourcing: Was Release Date for FrameMaker 8?

2006-05-16 Thread Bill Swallow
Greater value? To whom? The consumer, perhaps, sure, but what about us writers? We won't be very appreciative of the "trick" if we're reduced to slinging hash at McDonalds. And if it reduces us to fry cooks, you'd be hard pressed to convince us it *isn't* an evil. I argue that if you are red

Re: Outsourcing: Was Release Date for FrameMaker 8?

2006-05-16 Thread Bill Swallow
From a business standpoint, sure, it's about value but is there really value in outsourcing, or is it just cheaper? Talent is talent. It all depends on what you need. If you can get what you need cheaper and without hassle, generally that route wins. I did a contract at a company that had outs

RE: Outsourcing: Was Release Date for FrameMaker 8?

2006-05-16 Thread Fetzner, Bill
Bureeda opines: <> To me this gets us back to the original proposition, that the loss of jobs can be compensated by an increase in value. Not always of course, as one or more others argue, but in a thriving economy (like the one we're now witnessing in our "off-shoring" society), that's more likel

RE: Outsourcing

2006-05-16 Thread Anne Robotti
> So, you seem to be saying that it requires no research > whatsoever to "firmly" conclude that outsourcing does not > resule in savings to the consumer, but you demand "firm" > research to prove that it does save the consumer money. > > Rubbish. Let's not take ourselves too seriously. I'm no

RE: Outsourcing

2006-05-16 Thread Daniel Emory
--- Anne Robotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Greater value? To whom? The consumer, perhaps, > I don't think the companies that are saving money by > outsourcing are > necessarily passing on the savings to the consumer. > I'd have to see some > pretty firm research on that before I'd believe i

RE: Outsourcing: Was Release Date for FrameMaker 8?

2006-05-16 Thread Bureeda Bruner
M To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Framers Subject: Re: RE: Release Date for FrameMaker 8? Not entirely correct re: outsourcing. There are many examples of companies cancelling their outsourced labor and bringing the work back into their home offices (I haven't the time or desire to cite, but there h

RE: Outsourcing: Was Release Date for FrameMaker 8?

2006-05-16 Thread Laura_J_Kirk
Yes but the companies are not strictly accountable to "the consumer," but rather to "the shareholders." And shareholders rarely complain about greater profits. ljk ___ Deja Moo: The feeling that you've heard this bull before. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote o

RE: Outsourcing: Was Release Date for FrameMaker 8?

2006-05-16 Thread Anne Robotti
> Greater value? To whom? The consumer, perhaps, I don't think the companies that are saving money by outsourcing are necessarily passing on the savings to the consumer. I'd have to see some pretty firm research on that before I'd believe it. Anne

Re: Outsourcing: Was Release Date for FrameMaker 8?

2006-05-16 Thread John Posada
> I did a contract at a company that had outsourced its > Tech Writing to India but after seeing how poorly the > Indians wrote English, they brought TW back to America. ... > > So I don't think it is such a great thing. To come to the conclusion that from hearing about ones that didn't work,

Re: Outsourcing: Was Release Date for FrameMaker 8?

2006-05-16 Thread Doug
Outsourcing is not an evil. It's evolution, and was bound to happen as other countries break into the tech sphere. Balance will eventually be met, as with anything. The trick is not how to keep jobs in higher-pay regions, but how to deliver greater value. Greater value? To whom? The consumer,