Classification: NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED
Hi All from a newbie
I've just migrated fom FM7.1 to 9.0.2.
I'm trying to output a doc containing a mixture of portrait and
landscape pages. In FM7 I used Save Book As PDF and got perfect results,
complete with bookmmarks. FM9 produces a PDF with
Classification: NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED
I've just upped from 7 to 9, and just about got to grips with the new
interface. There's a lot of nice things that were on my wishlist, and on
the whole I like it. Still lots to learn, though (even having used FM
for something like 15 years in both Win
Classification: NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED
I don't know if this is a bug but I can't find anything about it
anywhere else.
I have a number of docs with text insets. When I do an update, an extra
carriage return is added at the end of the inset which duplicates the
paratag of the first line of
Classification: NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED
Amongst other things, the Apply Master Pages thingy is great when you
have a mixture of portrait and landscape pages - makes it simple to
ensure they all stay the right way round. Saved me shedloads of hassle.
Other stuff: spreading it across multiple
-
From: Diane Gaskill [mailto:dgcal...@earthlink.net]
Sent: 20 October 2009 04:42
To: Milton, Cynthia; framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: RE: Xrefs in text insets (FM9)
Hi Cynthia,
You are not doing anything wrong. We had the same problem. The reason
that the links do not work
Classification: NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED
I use a different approach to this question. All my docs are provided to
the users as PDFs. Where they refer out to other docs I use hyperlinks
and open the referred-to docs in a new window (sometimes PDF, sometimes
Excel spreadsheet, etc.) It helps that
Classification: NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED
Sounds odd. All works for me OK. Exactly the same setup, BTW.
However, it's occurred to me that the Object Properties pod may be
trying to appear off-screen - I have mine set up so the main FM9 window
is on my big screen and all the pods and stuff stay
Classification: NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED
I try to use x-refs where possible for these. That way they still point
to the appropriate place in the doc when other stuff has been
added/moved/deleted. And when something's been deleted I just convert
the x-ref to text. Bit untidy, but satisfies the
Classification: NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED
Does the same in XP/FM9p250 unstructured, although I found that ending
one of the FM processes in Task Manager zapped the second instance as
well, and CPU usage died down immediately.
However, one has to ask why one would want to import formats from
Classification: NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED
I think this is an Acrobat Reader thing. I use this function a lot, and
stress to the users that they must do Edit Preferences Documents and
uncheck Open cross-document links in same window.
Cynthia Milton - 0773 889 5991
Technical Documentation
Classification: NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED
My local paper yesterday referred to a car being a right-off. And a
brochure published by the Home Office (the UK ministry for domestic
affairs) about the project I'm working on refers to vehicles being
stationery. The mind boggles.
Cynthia Milton - 0773
Classification: NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED
Good afternoon all.
One of my engineers came to me today having printed out a PDF I sent him
(FM9p250, WinXP SP3).
Not a dry seat in the house - the (A4) page was a tiny rectangle in the
middle of the sheet. When I fired up the PDF in Reader on my
...@voith.com]
Sent: 27 May 2010 14:27
To: Milton, Cynthia; framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: RE: PDF weirdness
Good luck, Cynthia. I've forgotten all of the details, but I've had
this happen in FM 6 and FM 7, too, so we can't blame FM 9 for this one.
I'm pretty sure the settings were
Classification: NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED
W*** is a four-letter thingy where I work. Just uttering it within my
hearing reduces me to jelly. I prefer a quiet life, with no dramas.
Seriously, as far as I'm concerned, ease of use, consistency (and
enforcement thereof), predictability, flexibility,
Classification: NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED
I put $lastpagenum in the Master pages of the last file (text colour
white so it doesn't show) in its own para format. Then I insert x-refs
to that paratag in the other files in the book. I can send you samples
off-list if you like.
Works a treat. Bit of
Classification: SERCO-PUBLIC
Hi All
FM9, XP.
I'm constructing a consolidated index of around 200 individual documents
and a 400-page book. I've created a book file containing the individual
docs and the book file.
I've managed to persuade it to produce an index containing the Subject
Classification: SERCO-PUBLIC
OK, so, I played around a bit more. I hope the following makes sense to
you.
To recap: the book file from which I'm generating the index contains
around 200 files and a book file, thus:
IOM (Index of Markers)
Files . . .
Book
This book file contains ordinary fm
Classification: SERCO-PUBLIC
Run out of brick walls.
FM9 p255, XP SP3
Single-file doc with four Sections. Sections and sub-sections numbered
1, 1.1, 1.1.1 etc.
Pgf numbering formats:
Heading1 S:n+. =0 =0 =0
Heading2 S:n.n+ =0 =0
Heading3 S:n.n.n+ =0
But I'm getting Sections
]
Sent: 30 September 2010 12:59
To: framers@lists.frameusers.com; Milton, Cynthia
Subject: Re: Pgf numbering strangeness
Cynthia,
Is the book numbering set the same for all chapters, except chapter 1?
Chapter 1 should have the chapter numbering set to start at 1.
All other it should be Continue
...@magma.ca]
Sent: 30 September 2010 14:17
To: Fred Ridder
Cc: dspre...@yahoo.com; framers@lists.frameusers.com; Milton, Cynthia
Subject: Re: Pgf numbering strangeness
Finding rogue paragraph numbering can be a little less tedious if you
save as MIF, open the MIF in a text editor, and search for PgfAutoNum
Classification: SERCO-PUBLIC
I'm not using $chapnum because it's a single file. I've just done a mif
wash, but no change.
Cynthia Milton - 0773 889 5991
Technical Documentation (Cyclamen - Rollestone)
Classification: SERCO-PUBLIC
This e-mail and any
Classification: SERCO-PUBLIC
You can produce a basic list of insets by adding a List of References
and adding Text Insets to it. This gives you a basic list giving:
Inset filename . . . . . . .Container filename . . . . . . . . . . page
number.
Not everything you want, but better than
Classification: SERCO-PUBLIC
Not just Adobe. Regardless of exchange rates, it's always been the case that
the dollar price is more or less the same numerical value as the sterling
price. Thus anything costing $100 in the US costs £100 over here (which is
sometimes twice the actual price). VAT
Classification: Serco Public
I have FM9 + XP SP3.
When importing Visio stuff I've found the best solution for me is to
export the Visio drawings as SVG for import to FM. Gives me a good
result. OLE's a nice idea, but can be a liability.
YMMV.
Cynthia Milton - 0773 889 5991
Technical
I generally use a Marker, type Hypertext, value:
message openfile path/filename
This works for all sorts of file type.
Cynthia Milton - 0773 889 5991
Technical Documentation
This e-mail and any attachments may contain sensitive and/or
privileged material. It is for the intended addressee(s)
This e-mail and any attachments may contain sensitive and/or
privileged material. It is for the intended addressee(s) only. If you
are not a named addressee, you must not use, retain or disclose
such information.
Serco cannot guarantee that the email or any attachments are free
from viruses.
This e-mail and any attachments may contain sensitive and/or
privileged material. It is for the intended addressee(s) only. If you
are not a named addressee, you must not use, retain or disclose
such information.
Serco cannot guarantee that the email or any attachments are free
from viruses.
Classification: Serco Public
Hi Gurus
FM9, XP SP3.
I have a humungous book ( 1600 pages) with a subject index. I print to
the Adobe PDF printer.
When I print just the index, with bookmarks specified (GroupTitlesIOM),
the resulting PDF shows the alphabetic bookmarks in the expected way.
To: Milton, Cynthia
Cc: framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: Re: PDF bookmarks [P]
Hi Cynthia,
More beer, definitely.
Make sure the GroupTitlesIOM format is specified in the book file PDF
Setup and not just in the Index file. (In the book file, select all
files including the book file
Classification: Serco Public
I believe I've now tried all combinations, and still no dice. Printing
to PS and then distilling doesn't work either. I still have bookmarks in
the individual index file, and none at all in the huge one.
I'll keep trying, but . . .
I may have to self-harm.
Cynthia
in Format Document PDF Setup
Bookmarks. Did you select all files in the book, before you did this?
Best regards
Winfried
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com [mailto:framers-
boun...@lists.frameusers.com] Im Auftrag von Milton, Cynthia
Gesendet
When I import from Visio I find the SVG format works best for me.
Cynthia Milton - 0773 889 5991
Technical Documentation
This e-mail and any attachments may contain sensitive and/or
privileged material. It is for the intended addressee(s) only. If you
are not a named addressee, you must not
I concur. In my last job I did exactly that (so engineers could find the doc
they needed easily). The uber-book contained over 300 separate docs, and
another 400-page big book as a sub-book.
When you generate the index, make sure you DO NOT UPDATE ANY NUMBERING, as
otherwise everything gets
Classification: NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED
I've just upped from 7 to 9, and just about got to grips with the new
interface. There's a lot of nice things that were on my wishlist, and on
the whole I like it. Still lots to learn, though (even having used FM
for something like 15 years in both Win and
Classification: NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED
I don't know if this is a bug but I can't find anything about it
anywhere else.
I have a number of docs with text insets. When I do an update, an extra
carriage return is added at the end of the inset which duplicates the
paratag of the first line of
Classification: NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED
I use a different approach to this question. All my docs are provided to
the users as PDFs. Where they refer out to other docs I use hyperlinks
and open the referred-to docs in a new window (sometimes PDF, sometimes
Excel spreadsheet, etc.) It helps that
Classification: NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED
I second that. Really difficult to winnow out the current content
otherwise.
Cynthia Milton - 0773 889 5991
Technical Documentation (Cyclamen - Rollestone)
-Original Message-
BTW, please don't quote the entire Framers Digest in you posts, just the
Classification: NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED
Hi All from a newbie
I've just migrated fom FM7.1 to 9.0.2.
I'm trying to output a doc containing a mixture of portrait and
landscape pages. In FM7 I used Save Book As PDF and got perfect results,
complete with bookmmarks. FM9 produces a PDF with
Classification: NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED
My personal faves are Palatino for text and Arial/Helvetica for
headings.
Cynthia Milton - 0773 889 5991
Technical Documentation
Classification: NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED
This e-mail and any attachments may contain sensitive and/or
privileged material;
Classification: NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED
Any chance of making this available to those of us on GMT (i.e., not
awfully awake at 4am)?
Cynthia Milton - 0773 889 5991
Technical Documentation
Classification: NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED
This e-mail and any attachments may contain sensitive
Classification: NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED
I have docs with text insets and quite a lot of Xrefs.
When I print the container doc to PDF, the Xrefs within the inset doc do
not convert to links.
Have I done something stupid? Or is this normal? The User Guide of FM9
sucks compared with previous
-
From: Diane Gaskill [mailto:dgcal...@earthlink.net]
Sent: 20 October 2009 04:42
To: Milton, Cynthia; framers at lists.frameusers.com
Subject: RE: Xrefs in text insets (FM9)
Hi Cynthia,
You are not doing anything wrong. We had the same problem. The reason
that the links do not work
Classification: NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED
Amongst other things, the Apply Master Pages thingy is great when you
have a mixture of portrait and landscape pages - makes it simple to
ensure they all stay the right way round. Saved me shedloads of hassle.
Other stuff: spreading it across multiple
Classification: NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED
I try to use x-refs where possible for these. That way they still point
to the appropriate place in the doc when other stuff has been
added/moved/deleted. And when something's been deleted I just convert
the x-ref to text. Bit untidy, but satisfies the
Classification: Serco Public
I have FM9 + XP SP3.
When importing Visio stuff I've found the best solution for me is to
export the Visio drawings as SVG for import to FM. Gives me a good
result. OLE's a nice idea, but can be a liability.
YMMV.
Cynthia Milton - 0773 889 5991
Technical
Classification: NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED
Sounds odd. All works for me OK. Exactly the same setup, BTW.
However, it's occurred to me that the Object Properties pod may be
trying to appear off-screen - I have mine set up so the main FM9 window
is on my big screen and all the pods and stuff stay on
Classification: SERCO-PUBLIC
Hi All
FM9, XP.
I'm constructing a consolidated index of around 200 individual documents
and a 400-page book. I've created a book file containing the individual
docs and the book file.
I've managed to persuade it to produce an index containing the Subject
Classification: SERCO-PUBLIC
OK, so, I played around a bit more. I hope the following makes sense to
you.
To recap: the book file from which I'm generating the index contains
around 200 files and a book file, thus:
IOM (Index of Markers)
Files . . .
Book
This book file contains ordinary fm
Classification: NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED
W*** is a four-letter thingy where I work. Just uttering it within my
hearing reduces me to jelly. I prefer a quiet life, with no dramas.
Seriously, as far as I'm concerned, ease of use, consistency (and
enforcement thereof), predictability, flexibility,
Classification: NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED
I put <$lastpagenum> in the Master pages of the last file (text colour
white so it doesn't show) in its own para format. Then I insert x-refs
to that paratag in the other files in the book. I can send you samples
off-list if you like.
Works a treat. Bit
Classification: NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED
Does the same in XP/FM9p250 unstructured, although I found that ending
one of the FM processes in Task Manager zapped the second instance as
well, and CPU usage died down immediately.
However, one has to ask why one would want to import formats from
Classification: NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED
I think this is an Acrobat Reader thing. I use this function a lot, and
stress to the users that they must do Edit > Preferences > Documents and
uncheck "Open cross-document links in same window".
Cynthia Milton - 0773 889 5991
Technical Documentation
Classification: NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED
My local paper yesterday referred to a car being a right-off. And a
brochure published by the Home Office (the UK ministry for domestic
affairs) about the project I'm working on refers to vehicles being
stationery. The mind boggles.
Cynthia Milton - 0773
Classification: NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED
Good afternoon all.
One of my engineers came to me today having printed out a PDF I sent him
(FM9p250, WinXP SP3).
Not a dry seat in the house - the (A4) page was a tiny rectangle in the
middle of the sheet. When I fired up the PDF in Reader on my laptop
...@voith.com]
Sent: 27 May 2010 14:27
To: Milton, Cynthia; framers at lists.frameusers.com
Subject: RE: PDF weirdness
Good luck, Cynthia. I've forgotten all of the details, but I've had
this happen in FM 6 and FM 7, too, so we can't blame FM 9 for this one.
I'm pretty sure the settings were
Classification: SERCO-PUBLIC
You can produce a basic list of insets by adding a List of References
and adding Text Insets to it. This gives you a basic list giving:
Inset filename . . . . . . .Container filename . . . . . . . . . . page
number.
Not everything you want, but better than
Classification: SERCO-PUBLIC
Not just Adobe. Regardless of exchange rates, it's always been the case that
the dollar price is more or less the same numerical value as the sterling
price. Thus anything costing $100 in the US costs ?100 over here (which is
sometimes twice the actual price). VAT
Classification: SERCO-PUBLIC
Hi All
I'm using FM9, but the manual isn't nearly as good as earlier ones, and
I've been trying to get hold of an electronic copy of the FM7 manual,
which I remember as being rather good. Can anyone help please?
Cynthia Milton - 0773 889 5991
Technical
Classification: SERCO-PUBLIC
Run out of brick walls.
FM9 p255, XP SP3
Single-file doc with four Sections. Sections and sub-sections numbered
1, 1.1, 1.1.1 etc.
Pgf numbering formats:
Heading1 S:.< =0>< =0>< =0>
Heading2 S:.< =0>< =0>
Heading3 S:..< =0>
But I'm
]
Sent: 30 September 2010 12:59
To: framers at lists.frameusers.com; Milton, Cynthia
Subject: Re: Pgf numbering strangeness
Cynthia,
Is the book numbering set the same for all chapters, except chapter 1?
Chapter 1 should have the chapter numbering set to start at 1.
All other it should be "Con
]
Sent: 30 September 2010 14:17
To: Fred Ridder
Cc: dspreadb at yahoo.com; framers at lists.frameusers.com; Milton, Cynthia
Subject: Re: Pgf numbering strangeness
Finding rogue paragraph numbering can be a little less tedious if you
save as MIF, open the MIF in a text editor, and search
Classification: SERCO-PUBLIC
I'm not using $chapnum because it's a single file. I've just done a mif
wash, but no change.
Cynthia Milton - 0773 889 5991
Technical Documentation (Cyclamen - Rollestone)
Classification: SERCO-PUBLIC
This e-mail and any
This e-mail and any attachments may contain sensitive and/or
privileged material. It is for the intended addressee(s) only. If you
are not a named addressee, you must not use, retain or disclose
such information.
Serco cannot guarantee that the email or any attachments are free
from viruses.
This e-mail and any attachments may contain sensitive and/or
privileged material. It is for the intended addressee(s) only. If you
are not a named addressee, you must not use, retain or disclose
such information.
Serco cannot guarantee that the email or any attachments are free
from viruses.
Classification: Serco Public
Hi Gurus
FM9, XP SP3.
I have a humungous book (> 1600 pages) with a subject index. I print to
the Adobe PDF printer.
When I print just the index, with bookmarks specified (GroupTitlesIOM),
the resulting PDF shows the alphabetic bookmarks in the expected way.
To: Milton, Cynthia
Cc: framers at lists.frameusers.com
Subject: Re: PDF bookmarks [P]
Hi Cynthia,
More beer, definitely.
Make sure the GroupTitlesIOM format is specified in the book file PDF
Setup and not just in the Index file. (In the book file, select all
files including the book file
Classification: Serco Public
I believe I've now tried all combinations, and still no dice. Printing
to PS and then distilling doesn't work either. I still have bookmarks in
the individual index file, and none at all in the huge one.
I'll keep trying, but . . .
I may have to self-harm.
Cynthia
a lie-down in a darkened room, especially as the country will grind
to a halt tomorrow because of some wedding or other. More beer, I think.
Cynthia Milton - 0773 889 5991
Technical Documentation
-Original Message-
From: Reng, Dr. Winfried [mailto:wr...@tycoint.com]
Sent: 27 April 2011 15:41
When I import from Visio I find the SVG format works best for me.
Cynthia Milton - 0773 889 5991
Technical Documentation
This e-mail and any attachments may contain sensitive and/or
privileged material. It is for the intended addressee(s) only. If you
are not a named addressee, you must not
I generally use a Marker, type Hypertext, value:
message openfile
This works for all sorts of file type.
Cynthia Milton - 0773 889 5991
Technical Documentation
This e-mail and any attachments may contain sensitive and/or
privileged material. It is for the intended addressee(s) only. If you
I concur. In my last job I did exactly that (so engineers could find the doc
they needed easily). The uber-book contained over 300 separate docs, and
another 400-page big book as a sub-book.
When you generate the index, make sure you DO NOT UPDATE ANY NUMBERING, as
otherwise everything gets
71 matches
Mail list logo