RE: Frame > Word > Frame -- is there a way to do this w/o going nuts?

2013-01-31 Thread Harro de Jong
> We've been maintaining a set of engineering specs for a client for >10 years. > The > documents are large, 300+ page multi-chapter books, with header autonumbering > that goes to 8 levels. About a year ago, client requested we give them the > Frame > content for one spec in Word so they could d

Re: Frame > Word > Frame -- is there a way to do this w/o going nuts?

2013-01-31 Thread Shmuel Wolfson
To avoid crashing when importing, remove some or all of the pictures before importing the file. Regards, Shmuel Wolfson 052-763-7133 On 30-Jan-13 9:32 PM, Tori Muir wrote: Thanks to all who replied, it's genuinely good to know there isn't a magically simple way to do this that I was unaware of

Re: Frame > Word > Frame -- is there a way to do this w/o going nuts?

2013-01-30 Thread Robert Lauriston
The file dates on the import filters have changed, but the menu choices have not, still includes Word 2007, which has been there since FM8. Adobe claims no improvements, and as of FM10 I haven't seen any. On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 7:25 AM, Art Campbell wrote: > You're two frame releases behind curr

Re: Frame > Word > Frame -- is there a way to do this w/o going nuts?

2013-01-30 Thread Tori Muir
Thanks to all who replied, it's genuinely good to know there isn't a magically simple way to do this that I was unaware of.  If the import filters are more robust, we definitely should look into upgrading -- we hadn't so far because as non-structured users we hadn't seen

Re: Frame > Word > Frame -- is there a way to do this w/o going nuts?

2013-01-30 Thread Art Campbell
A couple of points - I wouldn't work with the Word files at all if you have any other options. RTF would be the way to go. - You should have the option to open the RTFs in Frame using the Japanese RTF import filter. It's more robust than the English RTF filter. Try that... -

RE: Frame > Word > Frame -- is there a way to do this w/o going nuts?

2013-01-30 Thread Combs, Richard
Tori Muir wrote: > - We have saved selected chunks of the Word doc to RTF and imported to > Frame. On the plus side, paragraph formatting comes in OK, and tables > are tables (there are a bazillion tables). You can't help going slightly nuts. :-} If there are lots of tables, you'll go signifi

Re: Frame > Word > Frame -- is there a way to do this w/o going nuts?

2013-01-30 Thread Scott Turner
There is no clean or easy workflow. You are doing and have the best of recommendations. One wonders if they would use the same process of amateurish meddling with with brain surgery? On Jan 29, 2013, at 17:47, Craig Ede wrote: > One important step is to remember is that if you are opening wor

RE: Frame > Word > Frame -- is there a way to do this w/o going nuts?

2013-01-29 Thread Craig Ede
One important step is to remember is that if you are opening word docs in FM, you should save them to MIF and then reopen the MIF. This cleans out a lot of crap to begin with. I don't envy you on this on. Craig ___

Re: Frame > Word > Frame -- is there a way to do this w/o going nuts?

2013-01-29 Thread Robert Lauriston
I've found that some conversion tasks go faster when I export Word to RTF and import that in FrameMaker, and others go faster when I copy in Word and paste as RTF. ___ You are currently subscribed to framers as arch...@mail-archive.com. Send list messa