At 11:00 AM -0800 1/26/06, John Posada wrote:
> > And to get back to my point from yesterday, if you
>> click on any of these links, the email is shown as
>> "<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> " so that spammers can't get the
>> address...
>
>I'm not concerned about spammers. I'm concerned about a solution or
>p
At 11:00 AM -0800 1/26/06, John Posada wrote:
> > And to get back to my point from yesterday, if you
>> click on any of these links, the email is shown as
>> "<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> " so that spammers can't get the
>> address...
>
>I'm not concerned about spammers. I'm concerned about a solution or
>p
Jakob Fix wrote:
> Sorry, just found out that Framers is archived publicly with exactly what I
> need:
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/framers at lists.frameusers.com/
And to get back to my point from yesterday, if you click on any of these
links, the email is shown as "<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> " so
> And to get back to my point from yesterday, if you
> click on any of these links, the email is shown as
> "<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> " so that spammers can't get the
> address...
I'm not concerned about spammers. I'm concerned about a solution or
process being proposed internally with me being attr
> And to get back to my point from yesterday, if you
> click on any of these links, the email is shown as
> "<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> " so that spammers can't get the
> address...
I'm not concerned about spammers. I'm concerned about a solution or
process being proposed internally with me being attr
Jakob Fix wrote:
Sorry, just found out that Framers is archived publicly with exactly what I
need:
http://www.mail-archive.com/framers@lists.frameusers.com/
And to get back to my point from yesterday, if you click on any of these
links, the email is shown as "<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> " so that sp