At 11:00 AM -0800 1/26/06, John Posada wrote: > > And to get back to my point from yesterday, if you >> click on any of these links, the email is shown as >> "<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> " so that spammers can't get the >> address... > >I'm not concerned about spammers. I'm concerned about a solution or >process being proposed internally with me being attributed as part of >the solution, to find out that the solution was not exactly right for >that problem. I check and recheck my internal documentation to make >sure it is as accurate as I can make it and I stand behind it if >something goes wrong. Becoming part of a solution for a problems I >know nothing about and not being able to participate in making sure >it is accurate is something I'd like to avoid
Wow! I just can't relate to this perspective. Is this what living in a litigation-obsessed country does to one? >Remember...the purpose of his using the posts was for internal >support documentation. Do you want your solutions to be the fixes to >problems that you know nothing about? Trust me...chances are you can >be contacted with blocked email addresses and all. > >Give you an example. I "think" I know where Jakob Fix is from, gmail >address not withstanding. Almost anyone can be located with a name, >some text strings from a post, and the will to find out. The NSA is reading your mail and listening to your phone calls; Google, Yahoo and the like are building a profile on you. Is there anything of your privacy left to protect? - web