Re: Standard font for technical documentation

2009-07-22 Thread Graeme R Forbes
Syed said: Helvetica for all headers. I used to use Arial, but was clearly shown (in this list! :)) that Helvetica looks a lot better in larger sizes (like headers) and in printed form - better curves, etc. I missed this discussion but I'm not surprised. I've read in more than one place in

RE: Standard font for technical documentation

2009-07-22 Thread Dov Isaacs
: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 1:22 AM To: framers@lists.frameusers.com Subject: Re: Standard font for technical documentation Syed said: Helvetica for all headers. I used to use Arial, but was clearly shown (in this list! :)) that Helvetica looks a lot better in larger sizes (like headers

RE: Standard font for technical documentation

2009-07-21 Thread Reng, Dr. Winfried
Hi, My _personal_ preference leans to the new MS fonts (Cambria, I think it was) that were released with Vista, based on having edited two papers that used them and from an IEEE Spectrum article about the research involved in their creation. I have not personally used the fonts (not

RE: Standard font for technical documentation

2009-07-21 Thread Syed.Hosain
For standard typefaces embedded in print PDF documents, I use Palatino Linotype for serifs, the new (free) Inconsolata-dk for monospaced, and any of a number of sans-serif typefaces--usually Arial, Verdana, Calibri., etc. Hi, Gary. Did you mean Inconsolata-dk or Incolsolata-dz? I have not seen

Re: Standard font for technical documentation

2009-07-21 Thread Gary Schnabl
syed.hos...@aeris.net wrote: For standard typefaces embedded in print PDF documents, I use Palatino Linotype for serifs, the new (free) Inconsolata-dk for monospaced, and any of a number of sans-serif typefaces--usually Arial, Verdana, Calibri., etc. Hi, Gary. Did you mean

Re: Standard font for technical documentation

2009-07-20 Thread Neeraj Jain
Hi Mathieu, If your readers are going to view your documents online, go for Arial. Arial offers a very good reading quality on computer monitor. If you are going to provide hard copies of your guides, you can go for Verdana. Hope this helps!   ___ Smile can make

Re: Standard font for technical documentation

2009-07-20 Thread Art Campbell
I think it depends on the application, how the documents are delivered, and what the company's stanard fonts (part of the corporate look, or branding, are). The other thing you should know is that for some reason, picking fonts amounts to a religious war with odd fervor among the participants. So

RE: Standard font for technical documentation

2009-07-20 Thread Combs, Richard
Art Campbell wrote: I think it depends on the application, how the documents are delivered, and what the company's stanard fonts (part of the corporate look, or branding, are). The other thing you should know is that for some reason, picking fonts amounts to a religious war with odd

RE: Standard font for technical documentation

2009-07-20 Thread Reid Gray
Cc: framers@lists.frameusers.com Subject: Re: Standard font for technical documentation I think it depends on the application, how the documents are delivered, and what the company's stanard fonts (part of the corporate look, or branding, are). The other thing you should know is that for some

Re: Standard font for technical documentation

2009-07-20 Thread Art Campbell
Uh, no, no confusion. ;- ) I said: I usually use a serif body font and serif heads. The one I'm working in now uses Palatino and Avant Garde. So that would mean: serif for body = Palatino sans-serif for heads = Avant Garde Art Campbell art.campb...@gmail.com ... In my

RE: Standard font for technical documentation

2009-07-20 Thread Lizak, Samantha
Hi Mathieu- There has been a whole lot of research on this. If you are looking at reading quality, more important factors are kerning, leading, and line length. Also, the age and background of the readers has a significant effect. (For example, in a study published in the early 1990s,

RE: Standard font for technical documentation [RESOLVED]

2009-07-20 Thread mathieu jacquet
Well, for the good of mankind (we're talking about nuclear safety here :o) ), I close this topic. Thank you all for the valuable piece of information you provided me with! Cheers, Mathieu. Subject: RE: Standard font for technical documentation Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 10:44:59 -0400 From: rg

RE: Standard font for technical documentation [RESOLVED]

2009-07-20 Thread Rick Quatro
Yeah, but what about the bike shed? Rick Quatro Carmen Publishing Inc. r...@frameexpert.com 585-659-8267 Well, for the good of mankind (we're talking about nuclear safety here :o) ), I close this topic. Thank you all for the valuable piece of information you provided me with! Cheers, Mathieu.

Font availability (was RE: Standard font for technical documentation)

2009-07-20 Thread Simon BUCH
Hello, While everyone is on the subject of font usage and availability, I thought I would add some text about my experiences with having a corporate font style. The new Microsoft fonts [Calibri, Candara, Consolas, Cambria, Constantia, and Corbel] are available in Office 2007 installations, but

Font availability (was RE: Standard font for technical documentation)

2009-07-20 Thread Simon BUCH
Hello, While everyone is on the subject of font usage and availability, I thought I would add some text about my experiences with having a corporate font style. The new Microsoft fonts [Calibri, Candara, Consolas, Cambria, Constantia, and Corbel] are available in Office 2007 installations, but