Microsoft reportedly didn't use FrameMaker or RoboHelp to create
online help:
http://www.techwr-l.com/archives/0308/techwhirl-0308-00155.html#.VJCxcydg6iM
Microsoft Press has used FrameMaker for some books and probably still
does. They did the MMoS4 in InDesign.
__
esday, December 16, 2014 12:07 PM
To: Craig Ede; framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: RE: why view on phone WAS: online FrameMaker 12 Documentation totally
revamped
I'm curious about one thing (well, more than just one; but one thing in the
current context...):
Has Adobe ever actually said that t
ker 12.0.3" using "Acrobat Distiller 11.0 (Windows)".
Z
From: framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com
[mailto:framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of Fred Ridder
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2014 12:07 PM
To: Craig Ede; framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: RE: why view on phone
The named destinations show that the Using FrameMaker PDF was
generated by FrameMaker. The help source shows it was generated with
RoboHelp.
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Fred Ridder wrote:
> I'm curious about one thing (well, more than just one; but one thing in the
> current context...):
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com
> [mailto:framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of Robert Lauriston
> Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2014 12:48 PM
> To: framers@lists.frameusers.com
> Subject: Re: why view on phone WAS: online
Sure, it makes sense to generate all of the output formats and make
them available as samples. But choosing Responsive HTML instead of
WebHelp as the format for the primary copy of the help on adobe.com
just serves to highlight its limitations.
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Craig Ede wrote:
>
] On Behalf Of Robert Lauriston
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2014 12:48 PM
To: framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: Re: why view on phone WAS: online FrameMaker 12 Documentation
totally revamped
Nobody walks around while using FrameMaker.
My guess is they chose Responsive HTML over WebHelp for the
Nobody walks around while using FrameMaker.
My guess is they chose Responsive HTML over WebHelp for the same
reason they dropped topics, used larger type and screen shots, added
page breaks, and posted a URL to pages not visible to the public.
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 10:28 AM, Craig Ede wrote:
>
I think Google safety glasses would be a better idea. That way, you kill two
birds with one stone: information and safety. =D
Oh, and a third benefit: hands free.
Nadine
From: Craig Ede
To: framers@lists.frameusers.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2014 1:28 PM
Subject: why view on pho
