Bill:
> sell into the Academic publishing market
And into the commercial publishing non-fiction market! Then publishers
can stop using dumb Cindex and Sky Index to produce indexes that don't
embed in the source text and have to be done all over again when they (a)
publish the illustrated
Bill:
sell into the Academic publishing market
And into the commercial publishing non-fiction market! Then publishers
can stop using dumb Cindex and Sky Index to produce indexes that don't
embed in the source text and have to be done all over again when they (a)
publish the illustrated
Look inside my FrameMaker crystal ball. Can you see what I see? It's a bit
foggy, but if you concentrate for just a minute, an amazing new product will
come into focus. It's a technical writers dream come true ...
www.thecontentwrangler.com
Scott Abel
Content Management Strategist
The
But what would be *new* about it, except for existing products being bundled
together? This may be beneficial for someone just starting out, but for
those of us that already have a couple of the products, buying the bundle
will likely be more expensive than buying the missing pieces. And
A few flaws in this "vision"...
One, RoboHelp for FrameMaker was discontinued long ago and even though
the source code is now in Adobe's hands, they have a significant chunk
of it to either fix or toss and rewrite. RHFM was clunky, a resource
hog, slow as molasses, and buggy, and had very little
6:14 AM
> To: framers at lists.frameusers.com
> Subject: Re: A Technical Writing Suite From Adobe?
>
> A few flaws in this "vision"...
>
> One, RoboHelp for FrameMaker was discontinued long ago and
> even though the source code is now in Adobe's hands, they
&
That's what I thought.
GIGO.
On 4/25/06, Dov Isaacs wrote:
> Total and utter speculation by "The Content Wrangler"
> without any announcements, leaks (credible or otherwise),
> or other evidence to back it up ...
--
Bill Swallow
HATT List Owner
WWP-Users List Owner
Senior Member STC,
The "Content Wrangler's" "vision" of FrameMaker?s
future is fatally flawed. It would do little to
improve the quality of on-line help, or increase the
penetration of FrameMaker into the on-line help
market.
Some years back, I wrote an article entitled "Thoughts
About On-Line Help", which is still
At 11:41 AM -0700 4/25/06, Daniel Emory wrote:
>WHAT I PROPOSE INSTEAD is that Adobe provide a new
>version of FrameMaker that includes (in addition to
>all the existing link types) the new types specified
>in the XLink standard, and also provide an upgraded
>version of Acrobat that can, when a
